Uncertainty analysis of operational conditions in selective artificial ground freezing applications

IF 0.7 Q4 GREEN & SUSTAINABLE SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Journal of Sustainable Mining Pub Date : 2022-10-27 DOI:10.46873/2300-3960.1357
Ahmad F. Zueter, Saad Akhtar, A. Sasmito
{"title":"Uncertainty analysis of operational conditions in selective artificial ground freezing applications","authors":"Ahmad F. Zueter, Saad Akhtar, A. Sasmito","doi":"10.46873/2300-3960.1357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Artificial ground freezing (AGF) systems are susceptible to uncertain parameters highly affecting their performance. Particularly, selective artificial ground freezing (S-AGF) systems involve several uncertain operational conditions. In this study, uncertainty analysis is conducted to investigate four operational parameters: 1) coolant inlet temperature, 2) coolant flow rate, 3) pipes emissivity, and 4) pipes eccentricity. A reduced-order model developed and validated in our previous work for field-scale applications is exploited to simulate a total of 5,000 cases. The uncertain operational parameters are set according to Monte Carlo analysis based on field observations of a field-scale freeze-pipe in the mining industry extending to 460 m below the ground surface. The results indicate that the freezing time can range between 270 and 350 days with an average of 310 days, whereas the cooling load per one freeze-pipe ranges from 90 to 160 MWh, with an average of 129 MWh. Furthermore, it is observed that the freezing time and energy consumed are mostly dominated by the coolant inlet temperature, while energy dissipated in the passive zone (where ground freezing is not needed) is mostly affected by pipes emissivity. Overall, the conclusions of this study provide useful estimations for engineers and practitioners in the AGF industry. Abstract Arti fi cial ground freezing (AGF) systems are susceptible to uncertain parameters highly affecting their performance. Particularly, selective arti fi cial ground freezing (S-AGF) systems involve several uncertain operational conditions. In this study, uncertainty analysis is conducted to investigate four operational parameters: 1) coolant inlet temperature, 2) coolant fl ow rate, 3) pipes emissivity, and 4) pipes eccentricity. A reduced-order model developed and validated in our previous work for fi eld-scale applications is exploited to simulate a total of 5000 cases. The uncertain operational parameters are set according to Monte Carlo analysis based on fi eld observations of a fi eld-scale freeze-pipe in the mining industry extending to 460 m below the ground surface. The results indicate that the freezing time can range between 270 and 350 days with an average of 310 days, whereas the cooling load per one freeze-pipe ranges from 90 to 160 MWh, with an average of 129 MWh. Furthermore, it is observed that the freezing time and energy consumed are mostly dominated by the coolant inlet temperature, while energy dissipated in the passive zone (where ground freezing is not needed) is mostly affected by pipes emissivity. Overall, the conclusions of this study provide useful estimations for engineers and practitioners in the AGF industry.","PeriodicalId":37284,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sustainable Mining","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sustainable Mining","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46873/2300-3960.1357","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GREEN & SUSTAINABLE SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Artificial ground freezing (AGF) systems are susceptible to uncertain parameters highly affecting their performance. Particularly, selective artificial ground freezing (S-AGF) systems involve several uncertain operational conditions. In this study, uncertainty analysis is conducted to investigate four operational parameters: 1) coolant inlet temperature, 2) coolant flow rate, 3) pipes emissivity, and 4) pipes eccentricity. A reduced-order model developed and validated in our previous work for field-scale applications is exploited to simulate a total of 5,000 cases. The uncertain operational parameters are set according to Monte Carlo analysis based on field observations of a field-scale freeze-pipe in the mining industry extending to 460 m below the ground surface. The results indicate that the freezing time can range between 270 and 350 days with an average of 310 days, whereas the cooling load per one freeze-pipe ranges from 90 to 160 MWh, with an average of 129 MWh. Furthermore, it is observed that the freezing time and energy consumed are mostly dominated by the coolant inlet temperature, while energy dissipated in the passive zone (where ground freezing is not needed) is mostly affected by pipes emissivity. Overall, the conclusions of this study provide useful estimations for engineers and practitioners in the AGF industry. Abstract Arti fi cial ground freezing (AGF) systems are susceptible to uncertain parameters highly affecting their performance. Particularly, selective arti fi cial ground freezing (S-AGF) systems involve several uncertain operational conditions. In this study, uncertainty analysis is conducted to investigate four operational parameters: 1) coolant inlet temperature, 2) coolant fl ow rate, 3) pipes emissivity, and 4) pipes eccentricity. A reduced-order model developed and validated in our previous work for fi eld-scale applications is exploited to simulate a total of 5000 cases. The uncertain operational parameters are set according to Monte Carlo analysis based on fi eld observations of a fi eld-scale freeze-pipe in the mining industry extending to 460 m below the ground surface. The results indicate that the freezing time can range between 270 and 350 days with an average of 310 days, whereas the cooling load per one freeze-pipe ranges from 90 to 160 MWh, with an average of 129 MWh. Furthermore, it is observed that the freezing time and energy consumed are mostly dominated by the coolant inlet temperature, while energy dissipated in the passive zone (where ground freezing is not needed) is mostly affected by pipes emissivity. Overall, the conclusions of this study provide useful estimations for engineers and practitioners in the AGF industry.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
选择性人工冻结地面运行条件的不确定性分析
摘要人工冻结系统易受不确定参数的影响,对其性能有很大影响。特别是,选择性人工冻结(S-AGF)系统涉及几个不确定的操作条件。在本研究中,对4个运行参数进行了不确定性分析:1)冷却剂进口温度,2)冷却剂流量,3)管道发射率,4)管道偏心。在我们之前的现场规模应用中开发并验证了一个降阶模型,用于模拟总共5000个案例。根据某采矿业现场规模冻结管延伸至地表以下460 m的现场观测资料,采用蒙特卡罗分析方法确定了不确定运行参数。结果表明:冻结时间在270 ~ 350天之间,平均为310天;每根冻结管的冷负荷在90 ~ 160 MWh之间,平均为129 MWh。冻结时间和能量消耗主要受冷却剂入口温度的影响,而被动区(不需要地面冻结)的能量耗散主要受管道发射率的影响。总的来说,本研究的结论为AGF行业的工程师和从业者提供了有用的估计。摘要人工冻结系统易受不确定参数的影响,对其性能有很大影响。特别是,选择性人工地面冻结(S-AGF)系统涉及几个不确定的操作条件。在本研究中,对4个运行参数进行了不确定性分析:1)冷却剂进口温度,2)冷却剂流量,3)管道发射率,4)管道偏心。在我们之前的工作中开发并验证了一个用于现场规模应用的降阶模型,用于模拟总共5000个案例。根据矿山现场尺度冻结管的现场观测结果,通过蒙特卡罗分析,确定了不确定运行参数。结果表明:冻结时间在270 ~ 350天之间,平均为310天;每根冻结管的冷负荷在90 ~ 160 MWh之间,平均为129 MWh。冻结时间和能量消耗主要受冷却剂入口温度的影响,而被动区(不需要地面冻结)的能量耗散主要受管道发射率的影响。总的来说,本研究的结论为AGF行业的工程师和从业者提供了有用的估计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Sustainable Mining
Journal of Sustainable Mining Earth and Planetary Sciences-Geology
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Influence of the moisture on fumes derived from the ANFO detonation Modified method for assessing the required expenditures and estimated time of hard coal mine liquidation Study on law and influencing factors of air leakage in isolated island working face with large burial depth Tracking mining company electric vehicles for sustainable development optimization using Distributed Ledger Technologies Prototype device for measuring the dustiness of stone and lime dust used in explosion prevention
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1