Trends in the use of multi-criteria decision-making methods in technology transfer processes (a critic review)

Q4 Agricultural and Biological Sciences International Journal of Agricultural Extension Pub Date : 2021-12-30 DOI:10.33687/ijae.009.03.3686
W. Orjuela-Garzon, S. Quintero, M. Maldonado
{"title":"Trends in the use of multi-criteria decision-making methods in technology transfer processes (a critic review)","authors":"W. Orjuela-Garzon, S. Quintero, M. Maldonado","doi":"10.33687/ijae.009.03.3686","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The application of multi-criterion decision-making methods allows reducing the ambiguity, imprecision, uncertainty, and subjectivity in human-based judgments when processes of transfer and appropriation of technologies are developed. These types of MCDM are key for developing countries since the efficiency of the transfer process is vital to improve the productivity and competitiveness of companies and territories based on correct prioritization and selection of technologies, the definition of barriers and drivers, or the selection of the best provider, among others. In this sense, it is key to identify what is the evolution in the empirical use of this type of techniques for knowledge management and the reduction of competitive gaps. The objective of this review was to identify the current state-of-the-art of applications and use of methods for multi-criteria decision-making process in sectorial technology transfer, to establish trends, application areas, and future challenges. The review was conducted in the \"SCOPUS\" database between the years 2010 through 2021. The results showed three major research perspectives: a) Determination of technology-transfer strategies, b) Selection of appropriate technologies and c) Determination of barriers and drivers. The correct selection of transfer strategies and appropriate technologies can improve the efficiency of sectors such as agriculture, renewable energies, manufacturing, and construction that still refuse to introduce innovations, due to barriers such as acquisition and maintenance costs, complexity of use, ease of use. use and perceived utility.","PeriodicalId":52390,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Agricultural Extension","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Agricultural Extension","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33687/ijae.009.03.3686","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The application of multi-criterion decision-making methods allows reducing the ambiguity, imprecision, uncertainty, and subjectivity in human-based judgments when processes of transfer and appropriation of technologies are developed. These types of MCDM are key for developing countries since the efficiency of the transfer process is vital to improve the productivity and competitiveness of companies and territories based on correct prioritization and selection of technologies, the definition of barriers and drivers, or the selection of the best provider, among others. In this sense, it is key to identify what is the evolution in the empirical use of this type of techniques for knowledge management and the reduction of competitive gaps. The objective of this review was to identify the current state-of-the-art of applications and use of methods for multi-criteria decision-making process in sectorial technology transfer, to establish trends, application areas, and future challenges. The review was conducted in the "SCOPUS" database between the years 2010 through 2021. The results showed three major research perspectives: a) Determination of technology-transfer strategies, b) Selection of appropriate technologies and c) Determination of barriers and drivers. The correct selection of transfer strategies and appropriate technologies can improve the efficiency of sectors such as agriculture, renewable energies, manufacturing, and construction that still refuse to introduce innovations, due to barriers such as acquisition and maintenance costs, complexity of use, ease of use. use and perceived utility.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在技术转让过程中使用多标准决策方法的趋势(评论家评论)
多标准决策方法的应用允许在开发技术转让和占有过程时减少基于人的判断中的歧义、不精确、不确定性和主观性。这些类型的MCDM对发展中国家至关重要,因为转让过程的效率对于根据正确的优先次序和技术选择、确定障碍和驱动因素或选择最佳提供者等提高公司和地区的生产力和竞争力至关重要。从这个意义上说,关键是要确定这类技术在知识管理和减少竞争差距方面的经验使用的演变。这一审查的目的是确定在部门技术转让中采用多标准决策过程的最新应用和方法,确定趋势、应用领域和未来的挑战。该审查在2010年至2021年期间在“SCOPUS”数据库中进行。研究结果显示了三个主要的研究视角:a)确定技术转移策略;b)选择合适的技术;c)确定障碍和驱动因素。正确选择转让战略和适当的技术可以提高农业、可再生能源、制造业和建筑业等部门的效率,这些部门由于诸如获取和维护成本、使用复杂性和易用性等障碍而仍然拒绝引入创新。使用和感知效用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Agricultural Extension
International Journal of Agricultural Extension Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Plant Science
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
期刊最新文献
Influence of cultural norms and traditions on food insecurity among small-scale farmers in marmanet ward, laikipia county, Kenya Youths as recipients and providers of agriculture information – the vertical vegetable gardening case in Busia County, Kenya Effect of excessive use of agrochemicals on farming practices: Bangladesh perspectives Mediator factorial model of social entrepreneurship in the covid-19 era The covid-19 pandemic effect to livelihood strategy adaptation of rubber smallholding household: a case study in Songkhla province, the southern Thailand
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1