The Deportation Machine: America’s Long History of Expelling Immigrants

Q1 Social Sciences Journal of Race, Ethnicity and Politics Pub Date : 2022-07-18 DOI:10.1017/rep.2022.12
Philip Kretsedemas
{"title":"The Deportation Machine: America’s Long History of Expelling Immigrants","authors":"Philip Kretsedemas","doi":"10.1017/rep.2022.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Adam Goodman ’ s The Deportation Machine provides a thorough treatment of the enforcement and policy mechanisms that the US government has used to expel noncitizens from the late 19 th century to the present day. Goodman begins by introducing the readerto threemechanismsthatheusesto structure theargumentforthe entire book; formal deportations, voluntary departures, and a more amorphous and informal set of practicesthathavebeenusedbythefederalandlocalauthoritiestoencourage noncitizens to “ self-deport. ” Goodman goes on to show that, throughout US history, the federal government has leaned more heavily on the latter two mechanisms than it has on formal deportation proceedings. In the process, he opens up some important questions about how to best define expulsions as a legal-administrative reality, considering that many noncitizens who are expelled from the US, by the mechanisms described by Goodman, do not show up in any of the federal government ’ s immigration enforcement statistics.Goodman ’ s subject matter makes for a ready comparison with Daniel Kanstroom ’ s Deportation Nation and Mae Ngai ’ s Impossible Subjects. Unlike these books, however, Goodman pays more attention to primary source documents generated by federal agents and enforcement agencies. His detailed treatment of enforcement tactics also recalls Kitty Calavita ’ s Inside the State (focusing on the Bracero Program) and Joseph Nevin ’ s Operation Gatekeeper and Beyond, but with a more ambitious historical scope. It bears emphasizing, however, that the most important distinguishing feature of T he Deportation Machine is Goodman ’ s argu-ment, which focuses the reader ’ s attention on the federal government ’ s longstanding reliance on expulsion practices that operate outside the court system and in the gray zones of the law. His account of these practices provides an important corrective to much of the recent research on criminal deportations and the intersections of criminal and immigration","PeriodicalId":37190,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Race, Ethnicity and Politics","volume":"5 1","pages":"607 - 609"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Race, Ethnicity and Politics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/rep.2022.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Adam Goodman ’ s The Deportation Machine provides a thorough treatment of the enforcement and policy mechanisms that the US government has used to expel noncitizens from the late 19 th century to the present day. Goodman begins by introducing the readerto threemechanismsthatheusesto structure theargumentforthe entire book; formal deportations, voluntary departures, and a more amorphous and informal set of practicesthathavebeenusedbythefederalandlocalauthoritiestoencourage noncitizens to “ self-deport. ” Goodman goes on to show that, throughout US history, the federal government has leaned more heavily on the latter two mechanisms than it has on formal deportation proceedings. In the process, he opens up some important questions about how to best define expulsions as a legal-administrative reality, considering that many noncitizens who are expelled from the US, by the mechanisms described by Goodman, do not show up in any of the federal government ’ s immigration enforcement statistics.Goodman ’ s subject matter makes for a ready comparison with Daniel Kanstroom ’ s Deportation Nation and Mae Ngai ’ s Impossible Subjects. Unlike these books, however, Goodman pays more attention to primary source documents generated by federal agents and enforcement agencies. His detailed treatment of enforcement tactics also recalls Kitty Calavita ’ s Inside the State (focusing on the Bracero Program) and Joseph Nevin ’ s Operation Gatekeeper and Beyond, but with a more ambitious historical scope. It bears emphasizing, however, that the most important distinguishing feature of T he Deportation Machine is Goodman ’ s argu-ment, which focuses the reader ’ s attention on the federal government ’ s longstanding reliance on expulsion practices that operate outside the court system and in the gray zones of the law. His account of these practices provides an important corrective to much of the recent research on criminal deportations and the intersections of criminal and immigration
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
《驱逐机器:美国驱逐移民的悠久历史
亚当·古德曼(Adam Goodman)的《驱逐机器》(The Deportation Machine)对美国政府从19世纪末至今用来驱逐非公民的执法和政策机制进行了全面探讨。古德曼首先向读者介绍了三种机制,用来构建整本书的论点;正式驱逐出境,自愿离境,以及联邦和地方当局用来鼓励非公民“自我驱逐出境”的一套更加模糊和非正式的做法。古德曼继续指出,在整个美国历史上,联邦政府更倾向于后两种机制,而不是正式的驱逐程序。在这个过程中,他提出了一些重要的问题,关于如何最好地将驱逐定义为法律-行政现实,考虑到许多被古德曼描述的机制驱逐出美国的非公民,没有出现在联邦政府的移民执法统计数据中。古德曼的题材可以与丹尼尔·坎斯特鲁姆的《驱逐之国》和梅·奈的《不可能的主题》进行比较。然而,与这些书不同的是,古德曼更关注联邦特工和执法机构产生的第一手来源文件。他对执法策略的详细处理也让人想起了凯蒂·卡拉维塔的《国家内部》(聚焦于布拉塞罗计划)和约瑟夫·内文的《守门人行动》以及《超越》,但他的历史视野更宏大。然而,值得强调的是,《驱逐机器》最重要的特点是古德曼的论点,它将读者的注意力集中在联邦政府长期依赖于法院系统之外和法律灰色地带的驱逐做法上。他对这些做法的描述为最近关于刑事驱逐以及刑事和移民交叉的许多研究提供了重要的纠正
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Race, Ethnicity and Politics
Journal of Race, Ethnicity and Politics Social Sciences-Anthropology
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
期刊最新文献
Responsiveness to Coethnics and Cominorities: Evidence from an Audit Experiment of State Legislators Introduction to the Final 2023 Issue The Advantage of Disadvantage: Costly Protest and Legislative Responsiveness By LaGina Gause, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2022 Counting the State: State Resistance and Federal Enumeration of Latinos 1930–1970 Anger, Fear, and the Racialization of News Media Coverage of Protest Activity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1