Selection of Candidates for Academic Scholarships Using Analytical Hierarchy Process (Ahp) and Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) Methods at National University

Asafalex Asafalex, M. Firmansyah, M. Darwis, I. Sw
{"title":"Selection of Candidates for Academic Scholarships Using Analytical Hierarchy Process (Ahp) and Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) Methods at National University","authors":"Asafalex Asafalex, M. Firmansyah, M. Darwis, I. Sw","doi":"10.15408/jti.v15i1.24780","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The National University administers several scholarships for new students each year. The problem is, the University does not yet have a standard method for determining beneficiaries. They have difficulty in determining prospective scholarship recipients with the same criteria. In fact, sometimes it only relies on people's instincts, which can be subjective. The University should implement a DSS system to overcome this problem. Therefore, in this study, the AHP method is applied and used to weight the criteria and test the level of consistency so that the criteria are in accordance with the type of scholarship. In addition, the SAW method is also used for determining scholarship recipients according to the quota. The results of this study are the priority weights of the importance of each criterion, namely the average value of report cards (0.35), parents' income (0.23), certificates (0.05), affidavits of not working and receiving scholarships (0.15), year of graduation (0.11) and number of certificates (0.10). The consistency ratio value is 0.03741 indicating the weight is consistent. This study also resulted in the best ranking of candidates for academic scholarships, with a result of 0.93. The average value of the application test results using the TAM method is 80.5%.","PeriodicalId":52586,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Sarjana Teknik Informatika","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Sarjana Teknik Informatika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15408/jti.v15i1.24780","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The National University administers several scholarships for new students each year. The problem is, the University does not yet have a standard method for determining beneficiaries. They have difficulty in determining prospective scholarship recipients with the same criteria. In fact, sometimes it only relies on people's instincts, which can be subjective. The University should implement a DSS system to overcome this problem. Therefore, in this study, the AHP method is applied and used to weight the criteria and test the level of consistency so that the criteria are in accordance with the type of scholarship. In addition, the SAW method is also used for determining scholarship recipients according to the quota. The results of this study are the priority weights of the importance of each criterion, namely the average value of report cards (0.35), parents' income (0.23), certificates (0.05), affidavits of not working and receiving scholarships (0.15), year of graduation (0.11) and number of certificates (0.10). The consistency ratio value is 0.03741 indicating the weight is consistent. This study also resulted in the best ranking of candidates for academic scholarships, with a result of 0.93. The average value of the application test results using the TAM method is 80.5%.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
运用层次分析法(Ahp)和简单加性加权法(SAW)筛选国立大学奖学金候选人
国立大学每年为新生提供多项奖学金。问题是,联合国大学还没有确定受益人的标准方法。他们很难用同样的标准来确定未来的奖学金获得者。事实上,有时它只依赖于人的直觉,这可能是主观的。大学应该实施发展支助事务系统来克服这个问题。因此,在本研究中,采用AHP方法对标准进行加权,并检验一致性水平,使标准与奖学金类型一致。此外,还采用SAW法根据名额确定奖学金获得者。本研究的结果是各指标重要性的优先级权重,即成绩单平均值(0.35)、父母收入平均值(0.23)、证书平均值(0.05)、不工作和获得奖学金的宣誓书平均值(0.15)、毕业年份(0.11)和证书数量(0.10)。一致性比率为0.03741,表示权重一致。该研究还得出了学术奖学金候选人的最佳排名,结果为0.93。使用TAM方法的应用测试结果的平均值为80.5%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Development of Intelligent Door Lock System for Room Management Using Multi Factor Authentication Development of Web-Based Rtikabdimas Application With a Rapid Unified Process Approach Real-Time Monitoring of Gas Fields: Prototype at Pt Gamma Energi Pratama Bogor Scrum Framework Implementation for Building an Application of Monitoring and Booking E-Bus Based on QRCode Iterative Dichotomiser Three (Id3) Algorithm For Classification Community of Productive and Non-Productive
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1