To “maister the circumstance”: Mulcaster’s Positions and Spenser’s Faerie Queene

Q1 Arts and Humanities Spenser Studies Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1086/706175
Åke Bergvall
{"title":"To “maister the circumstance”: Mulcaster’s Positions and Spenser’s Faerie Queene","authors":"Åke Bergvall","doi":"10.1086/706175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay argues that the prominent Elizabethan pedagogue Richard Mulcaster exerted a considerable influence on the narrative strategies of his pupil Edmund Spenser, especially as seen in Book I of The Faerie Queene. Where recent scholars such as Jeff Dolven and Andrew Wallace have maintained that Spenser was critical of many of the humanist practices they deem prevalent in the Elizabethan classroom, this study shows that such critique of humanism was already a basic part of the reformed curriculum at Merchant Taylors’ School, where Spenser received his early training under Mulcaster. The essay first provides a reading of Mulcaster’s main pedagogical text, Positions (1581), and then applies its key concepts to a reading of Book I of Spenser’s poem with a double emphasis on the hero of the poem, Redcrosse, and on the reader’s interaction with the text. The most important of these concepts is the seemingly innocuous term “circumstance.” Aside from being a key concept within forensic oratory, to “maister the circumstance” is for Mulcaster a shorthand for a cautious approach to the classical text studied in his classroom. The same strategy, this essay argues, is implemented in the poem. The reader must pay attention to the circumstances, with their rhetorical, pedagogical, and theological connotations, triggered in large part by the apparent inability of Redcrosse, the putative hero of the book, to do so. Additionally, as a subcategory of the rhetorical connotations, there is also the need to assess the use of names in the poem.","PeriodicalId":39606,"journal":{"name":"Spenser Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spenser Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/706175","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This essay argues that the prominent Elizabethan pedagogue Richard Mulcaster exerted a considerable influence on the narrative strategies of his pupil Edmund Spenser, especially as seen in Book I of The Faerie Queene. Where recent scholars such as Jeff Dolven and Andrew Wallace have maintained that Spenser was critical of many of the humanist practices they deem prevalent in the Elizabethan classroom, this study shows that such critique of humanism was already a basic part of the reformed curriculum at Merchant Taylors’ School, where Spenser received his early training under Mulcaster. The essay first provides a reading of Mulcaster’s main pedagogical text, Positions (1581), and then applies its key concepts to a reading of Book I of Spenser’s poem with a double emphasis on the hero of the poem, Redcrosse, and on the reader’s interaction with the text. The most important of these concepts is the seemingly innocuous term “circumstance.” Aside from being a key concept within forensic oratory, to “maister the circumstance” is for Mulcaster a shorthand for a cautious approach to the classical text studied in his classroom. The same strategy, this essay argues, is implemented in the poem. The reader must pay attention to the circumstances, with their rhetorical, pedagogical, and theological connotations, triggered in large part by the apparent inability of Redcrosse, the putative hero of the book, to do so. Additionally, as a subcategory of the rhetorical connotations, there is also the need to assess the use of names in the poem.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“掌控局面”:Mulcaster的《position》和Spenser的《仙后》
本文认为,伊丽莎白时代著名的教育家理查德·穆尔卡斯特对他的学生埃德蒙·斯宾塞的叙事策略产生了相当大的影响,尤其是在《仙后》的第一卷中。最近的学者,如杰夫·多尔文和安德鲁·华莱士坚持认为,斯宾塞批评了许多他们认为在伊丽莎白时代课堂上普遍存在的人文主义做法,这项研究表明,这种对人文主义的批评已经是商人泰勒学校改革课程的基本组成部分,斯宾塞在穆尔卡斯特的指导下接受了早期训练。这篇文章首先提供了Mulcaster的主要教学文本《Positions》(1581)的阅读,然后将其关键概念应用于斯宾塞诗歌第一卷的阅读,并双重强调了诗歌的主人公Redcrosse,以及读者与文本的互动。这些概念中最重要的是看似无害的术语“环境”。除了在法庭演讲学中是一个关键概念外,对Mulcaster来说,“掌控环境”是对课堂上学习的经典文本采取谨慎方法的一种速记。这篇文章认为,同样的策略在这首诗中得到了实施。读者必须注意环境,以及它们的修辞、教学和神学内涵,这在很大程度上是由于书中公认的英雄雷德克罗斯显然没有能力做到这一点。此外,作为修辞内涵的一个子类,名字在诗歌中的使用也有必要进行评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Spenser Studies
Spenser Studies Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Front Matter “Soveraigne place”: Spenser with Henri Lefebvre Thinking through Symbionts: Spenser with Donna Haraway On Dissonance and Late Style: Spenser with Theodor W. Adorno In the Person of the Author: A Response to “Imagined Companions”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1