High-stakes online assessments: A case study of National Benchmark Tests during COVID-19

Q3 Social Sciences Perspectives in Education Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.18820/2519593x/pie.v40.i1.13
Tatiana Sango, R. Prince, Sanet Steyn, P. Mudavanhu
{"title":"High-stakes online assessments: A case study of National Benchmark Tests during COVID-19","authors":"Tatiana Sango, R. Prince, Sanet Steyn, P. Mudavanhu","doi":"10.18820/2519593x/pie.v40.i1.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Owing to the COVID-19 pandemic, paper-based delivery of the National Benchmark Tests (NBTs) was not possible during the 2020 testing cycle. The NBTs, being a large-scale national assessment project, did not have alternative options, other than to offer the tests online. Moving these high-stakes tests online meant that certain considerations had to be considered to retain the credibility and security of the tests, without compromising the validity and reliability of the scores. Digitising the paper-based NBTs required an innovative, flexible and robust solution, which promotes fairness and ensures the quality of testing is maintained, while in many ways remains comparable to the paper-based implementation. To deliver the NBTs online, the following important considerations needed to be addressed: test security and integrity, test candidate identification processes, the prevention of dishonest behaviour, test scheduling and timing and technical support. The online testing solution chosen integrates the following aspects: it 1) enables all candidates to take the same test at the same time;2) ensures the quality and similarity in experience of test delivery for all candidates as far as possible;3) prevents candidates from accessing other applications and devices during the test;4) enables proctoring before, during and after the tests to encourage appropriate behaviour similar to that expected during paper-based tests;5) provides live support to assist candidates to deal with technical challenges and to guide them through the test sessions and 6) processes and presents data and scores in the same way as for the paper-based tests. In this article, we analyse the integration and complexity of the online NBTs solution, the opportunities and challenges associated with this form of delivery and reflect on test candidates' and the team's experiences. We discuss components of online assessment and wish to argue that this is also relevant to high-stakes course assessments. This case study should help to refine the scope of further research and development in the use of online high-stakes assessments.","PeriodicalId":19864,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives in Education","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18820/2519593x/pie.v40.i1.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Owing to the COVID-19 pandemic, paper-based delivery of the National Benchmark Tests (NBTs) was not possible during the 2020 testing cycle. The NBTs, being a large-scale national assessment project, did not have alternative options, other than to offer the tests online. Moving these high-stakes tests online meant that certain considerations had to be considered to retain the credibility and security of the tests, without compromising the validity and reliability of the scores. Digitising the paper-based NBTs required an innovative, flexible and robust solution, which promotes fairness and ensures the quality of testing is maintained, while in many ways remains comparable to the paper-based implementation. To deliver the NBTs online, the following important considerations needed to be addressed: test security and integrity, test candidate identification processes, the prevention of dishonest behaviour, test scheduling and timing and technical support. The online testing solution chosen integrates the following aspects: it 1) enables all candidates to take the same test at the same time;2) ensures the quality and similarity in experience of test delivery for all candidates as far as possible;3) prevents candidates from accessing other applications and devices during the test;4) enables proctoring before, during and after the tests to encourage appropriate behaviour similar to that expected during paper-based tests;5) provides live support to assist candidates to deal with technical challenges and to guide them through the test sessions and 6) processes and presents data and scores in the same way as for the paper-based tests. In this article, we analyse the integration and complexity of the online NBTs solution, the opportunities and challenges associated with this form of delivery and reflect on test candidates' and the team's experiences. We discuss components of online assessment and wish to argue that this is also relevant to high-stakes course assessments. This case study should help to refine the scope of further research and development in the use of online high-stakes assessments.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高风险在线评估:COVID-19期间国家基准测试案例研究
由于2019冠状病毒病大流行,在2020年的测试周期中,无法进行国家基准测试(nbt)。NBTs是一项大规模的国家评估项目,除了在线提供测试之外,没有其他选择。将这些高风险的考试转移到网上意味着必须考虑某些因素,以保持考试的可信度和安全性,同时不影响分数的有效性和可靠性。数字化笔试考试需要一种创新、灵活和强大的解决方案,以促进公平并确保保持考试质量,同时在许多方面仍可与笔试考试相媲美。为了在线提供nbt,需要解决以下重要问题:考试的安全性和完整性,考试候选人的识别过程,防止不诚实行为,考试的安排和时间以及技术支持。所选择的在线测试解决方案集成了以下几个方面:1)使所有考生能够同时参加同一场考试;2)尽可能保证所有考生考试交付的质量和经验的相似性;3)防止考生在考试过程中访问其他应用程序和设备;在考试期间和之后,鼓励与笔试期间类似的适当行为;5)提供现场支持,帮助考生应对技术挑战并指导他们完成考试;6)以与笔试相同的方式处理和呈现数据和分数。在这篇文章中,我们分析了在线nbt解决方案的集成和复杂性,与这种形式的交付相关的机遇和挑战,并反映了考生和团队的经验。我们讨论在线评估的组成部分,并希望认为这也与高风险课程评估有关。这一案例研究应有助于细化在使用在线高风险评估方面进一步研究和开发的范围。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Perspectives in Education
Perspectives in Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Perspectives in Education is a professional, refereed journal, which encourages submission of previously unpublished articles on contemporary educational issues. As a journal that represents a variety of cross-disciplinary interests, both theoretical and practical, it seeks to stimulate debates on a wide range of topics. PIE invites manuscripts employing innovative qualitative and quantitative methods and approaches including (but not limited to) ethnographic observation and interviewing, grounded theory, life history, case study, curriculum analysis and critique, policy studies, ethnomethodology, social and educational critique, phenomenology, deconstruction, and genealogy. Debates on epistemology, methodology, or ethics, from a range of perspectives including postpositivism, interpretivism, constructivism, critical theory, feminism, post-modernism are also invited. PIE seeks to stimulate important dialogues and intellectual exchange on education and democratic transition with respect to schools, colleges, non-governmental organisations, universities and technikons in South Africa and beyond.
期刊最新文献
Grade R teachers’ perceptions concerning parental participation in early literacy development in a disadvantaged context in the Western Cape An exploration of African-student agency: Placing students from historically disadvantaged communities at the centre A systematic review of the implications for teaching, learning and assessment at South African universities after the Covid-19 pandemic Self-Assessment Inclusion Scale (SAIS): a tool for measuring inclusive competence and sensitivity Investigating nomophobia as a possible mental health disorder in Gauteng public schools
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1