{"title":"Estimation and Confidence Intervals of Modified Process Capability Index Using Robust Measure of Variability","authors":"Mahendra Saha, S. Dey","doi":"10.1515/eqc-2022-0014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The process capability index (PCI), denoted by 𝐼, is a well-known characteristic in quality control analysis. Using Gini’s mean difference, we construct a new PCI, I G I_{G} say, assuming the two-parameter Weibull distribution (WD). In order to estimate the proposed I G I_{G} when the process follows the WD, we use five classical methods of estimation and compare the performance of the obtained estimators with respect to their mean squared errors (MSEs) through a simulation study. Confidence intervals for the proposed PCI are constructed based on five bootstrap confidence intervals (BCIs) methods. Monte Carlo simulation study has been carried out to compare the performance of these five BCIs in terms of average widths and coverage probabilities. Finally, three real data sets from electronic and food industries are employed for illustrating the effectiveness of the proposed study. All these data sets show that the width of bias-corrected accelerated bootstrap interval is minimum among all other considered BCIs.","PeriodicalId":37499,"journal":{"name":"Stochastics and Quality Control","volume":"1 1","pages":"153 - 164"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stochastics and Quality Control","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/eqc-2022-0014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract The process capability index (PCI), denoted by 𝐼, is a well-known characteristic in quality control analysis. Using Gini’s mean difference, we construct a new PCI, I G I_{G} say, assuming the two-parameter Weibull distribution (WD). In order to estimate the proposed I G I_{G} when the process follows the WD, we use five classical methods of estimation and compare the performance of the obtained estimators with respect to their mean squared errors (MSEs) through a simulation study. Confidence intervals for the proposed PCI are constructed based on five bootstrap confidence intervals (BCIs) methods. Monte Carlo simulation study has been carried out to compare the performance of these five BCIs in terms of average widths and coverage probabilities. Finally, three real data sets from electronic and food industries are employed for illustrating the effectiveness of the proposed study. All these data sets show that the width of bias-corrected accelerated bootstrap interval is minimum among all other considered BCIs.
过程能力指数(PCI)是质量控制分析中一个众所周知的特征,用𝐼表示。利用基尼均值差,假设双参数威布尔分布(WD),我们构造了一个新的PCI, I G I_{G}。为了在过程遵循WD时估计所提出的I G I_{G},我们使用了五种经典的估计方法,并通过仿真研究比较了所得到的估计器的均方误差(MSEs)的性能。基于五种自举置信区间(bci)方法构建了PCI的置信区间。通过蒙特卡罗模拟研究,比较了这五种bci在平均宽度和覆盖概率方面的性能。最后,采用来自电子和食品行业的三个真实数据集来说明所提出研究的有效性。所有这些数据集表明,在所有其他考虑的bci中,偏差校正加速自举间隔的宽度是最小的。