Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy of Lipoproteins and Risk of Coronary Heart Disease in the Cardiovascular Health Study

L. Kuller, A. Arnold, R. Tracy, J. Otvos, G. Burke, B. Psaty, D. Siscovick, D. Freedman, R. Kronmal
{"title":"Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy of Lipoproteins and Risk of Coronary Heart Disease in the Cardiovascular Health Study","authors":"L. Kuller, A. Arnold, R. Tracy, J. Otvos, G. Burke, B. Psaty, D. Siscovick, D. Freedman, R. Kronmal","doi":"10.1161/01.ATV.0000022015.97341.3A","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives—Relationships between incident cardiovascular disease and lipoprotein subclass measurements by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy were evaluated in the Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS) in a nested case-cohort analysis. Methods and Results—The case group consisted of 434 participants with incident myocardial infarction (MI) and angina diagnosed after entry to the study (1990 to 1995) and the comparison group, 249 “healthy” participants with no prevalent clinical or subclinical disease. By univariate analysis, the median levels for healthy participants versus participants with incident MI and angina were 0 versus 7 mg% for small low density lipoprotein (LDL), 1501 versus 1680 nmol/L for the number of LDL particles, and 21.6 versus 21.3 for LDL size, and these values were significantly different between “healthy” participants and those with incident MI and angina for women but not men. The levels of less dense LDL, which is most of the total LDL cholesterol among women, was not related to incident MI and angina. For women, large high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDLc), but not small HDLc, levels were significantly higher for healthy participants compared with levels for participants with MI and angina. For men and women, levels of total and very low density lipoprotein triglycerides were higher for the case group than for the healthy group. In multivariate models for women that included triglycerides and HDLc, the number of LDL particles (but not LDL size) remained significantly related to MI and angina. Conclusions—Small LDL, the size of LDL particles, and the greater number of LDL particles are related to incident coronary heart disease among older women.","PeriodicalId":8418,"journal":{"name":"Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology: Journal of the American Heart Association","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"328","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology: Journal of the American Heart Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/01.ATV.0000022015.97341.3A","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 328

Abstract

Objectives—Relationships between incident cardiovascular disease and lipoprotein subclass measurements by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy were evaluated in the Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS) in a nested case-cohort analysis. Methods and Results—The case group consisted of 434 participants with incident myocardial infarction (MI) and angina diagnosed after entry to the study (1990 to 1995) and the comparison group, 249 “healthy” participants with no prevalent clinical or subclinical disease. By univariate analysis, the median levels for healthy participants versus participants with incident MI and angina were 0 versus 7 mg% for small low density lipoprotein (LDL), 1501 versus 1680 nmol/L for the number of LDL particles, and 21.6 versus 21.3 for LDL size, and these values were significantly different between “healthy” participants and those with incident MI and angina for women but not men. The levels of less dense LDL, which is most of the total LDL cholesterol among women, was not related to incident MI and angina. For women, large high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDLc), but not small HDLc, levels were significantly higher for healthy participants compared with levels for participants with MI and angina. For men and women, levels of total and very low density lipoprotein triglycerides were higher for the case group than for the healthy group. In multivariate models for women that included triglycerides and HDLc, the number of LDL particles (but not LDL size) remained significantly related to MI and angina. Conclusions—Small LDL, the size of LDL particles, and the greater number of LDL particles are related to incident coronary heart disease among older women.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
心血管健康研究中脂蛋白核磁共振波谱与冠心病风险的关系
目的:在心血管健康研究(CHS)中,通过巢式病例队列分析评估核磁共振波谱测量的心血管疾病与脂蛋白亚类之间的关系。方法与结果:病例组包括434名在进入研究(1990 - 1995)后诊断为心肌梗死(MI)和心绞痛的参与者,对照组包括249名没有流行临床或亚临床疾病的“健康”参与者。通过单因素分析,健康参与者与心肌梗死和心绞痛参与者的中位水平为低密度脂蛋白(LDL)为0与7mg %, LDL颗粒数为1501与1680 nmol/L, LDL大小为21.6与21.3,这些值在女性“健康”参与者与心肌梗死和心绞痛参与者之间存在显著差异,而男性则无显著差异。低密度低密度脂蛋白(占女性总低密度脂蛋白胆固醇的大部分)的水平与心肌梗死和心绞痛的发生无关。对于女性来说,健康参与者的高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDLc)水平明显高于心肌梗死和心绞痛参与者的高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDLc)水平。对于男性和女性,病例组的总和极低密度脂蛋白甘油三酯水平高于健康组。在包括甘油三酯和高密度脂蛋白在内的女性多变量模型中,低密度脂蛋白颗粒的数量(而不是低密度脂蛋白的大小)仍然与心肌梗死和心绞痛显著相关。结论:老年妇女低密度脂蛋白、低密度脂蛋白颗粒大小和高密度脂蛋白颗粒数量与冠心病的发生有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Resistance to Neointimal Hyperplasia and Fatty Streak Formation in Mice With Adrenomedullin Overexpression Homocysteine Binds to Human Plasma Fibronectin and Inhibits Its Interaction With Fibrin Inflammation in Atherosclerosis: Lesion Formation in LDL Receptor–Deficient Mice With Perforin and Lystbeige Mutations Higher Usual Dietary Intake of Phytoestrogens Is Associated With Lower Aortic Stiffness in Postmenopausal Women Application of Ex Vivo Flow Chamber System for Assessment of Stent Thrombosis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1