Alterations of gut bacteria Akkermansia muciniphila and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii in late post-transplant period after liver transplantation

A. Kukov, M. Peruhova, Atanas Syarov, I. Altankova, N. Yurukova, A. Goncharov, R. Vazharova, Anoaneta Mihova, T. Velikova, Y. Uzunova
{"title":"Alterations of gut bacteria Akkermansia muciniphila and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii in late post-transplant period after liver transplantation","authors":"A. Kukov, M. Peruhova, Atanas Syarov, I. Altankova, N. Yurukova, A. Goncharov, R. Vazharova, Anoaneta Mihova, T. Velikova, Y. Uzunova","doi":"10.53986/ibjm.2022.0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Recent studies have shown that the intestinal microbiota can modulate certain systemic metabolic and immune responses, including liver graft function and the development of complications in patients after liver transplantation (LT). Akkermansia muciniphila (AKM) and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii (FAEP) are two of the most abundant gut commensal bacteria, with mucosa-protective and anti-inflammatory effects that are important for maintaining normal intestinal homeostasis and gut barrier function. Our objective was to quantify levels of Akkermansia muciniphila and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii in immunosuppressed patients with LT. Materials and methods: Fecal samples from 23 liver transplant patients (15 adults and 8 children) and 9 non-LT controls were examined. Bacterial DNA was isolated from the samples using the stool DNA isolation kit and the obtained DNA was analyzed with commercially available qPCR kit for AKM and FAEP. Results: We found a statistically significant decrease in the amount of AKM and FAEP compared to the control group. The median values were: for AKM 8.75 for patients and 10.25 for the control group (p = 0.030), and for FAEP 9.72 and 10.47, p = 0.003, respectively. In children after LT, this difference was also statistically significant: AKM (p = 0.051) and FAEP (p = 0.014). In contrast no statistically significant differences were found between adult patients and controls, AKM (p = 0.283) and FAEP (p = 0.056), although the amount of both bacteria showed tendency for reduction. Conclusions: In this pilot study, we found a reduction in the total amount of the two studied bacteria in transplanted patients compared to the control healthy group.","PeriodicalId":13190,"journal":{"name":"Iberoamerican Journal of Medicine","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iberoamerican Journal of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53986/ibjm.2022.0010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Recent studies have shown that the intestinal microbiota can modulate certain systemic metabolic and immune responses, including liver graft function and the development of complications in patients after liver transplantation (LT). Akkermansia muciniphila (AKM) and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii (FAEP) are two of the most abundant gut commensal bacteria, with mucosa-protective and anti-inflammatory effects that are important for maintaining normal intestinal homeostasis and gut barrier function. Our objective was to quantify levels of Akkermansia muciniphila and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii in immunosuppressed patients with LT. Materials and methods: Fecal samples from 23 liver transplant patients (15 adults and 8 children) and 9 non-LT controls were examined. Bacterial DNA was isolated from the samples using the stool DNA isolation kit and the obtained DNA was analyzed with commercially available qPCR kit for AKM and FAEP. Results: We found a statistically significant decrease in the amount of AKM and FAEP compared to the control group. The median values were: for AKM 8.75 for patients and 10.25 for the control group (p = 0.030), and for FAEP 9.72 and 10.47, p = 0.003, respectively. In children after LT, this difference was also statistically significant: AKM (p = 0.051) and FAEP (p = 0.014). In contrast no statistically significant differences were found between adult patients and controls, AKM (p = 0.283) and FAEP (p = 0.056), although the amount of both bacteria showed tendency for reduction. Conclusions: In this pilot study, we found a reduction in the total amount of the two studied bacteria in transplanted patients compared to the control healthy group.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肝移植术后后期肠道细菌嗜粘阿克曼氏菌和prausnitzfaecalibacterium的变化
最近的研究表明,肠道微生物群可以调节某些全身代谢和免疫反应,包括肝移植术后肝移植功能和并发症的发生。嗜粘杆菌(Akkermansia muciniphila, AKM)和prausnitzii粪杆菌(Faecalibacterium prausnitii, FAEP)是两种最丰富的肠道共生菌,具有粘膜保护和抗炎作用,对维持正常肠道稳态和肠道屏障功能至关重要。我们的目的是量化嗜粘阿克曼氏菌和prausnitzfaecalibacterium在免疫抑制的肝移植患者中的水平。材料和方法:对23例肝移植患者(15名成人和8名儿童)和9名非肝移植对照组的粪便样本进行检测。使用粪便DNA分离试剂盒从样品中分离细菌DNA,并使用市售的AKM和FAEP qPCR试剂盒分析所得DNA。结果:与对照组相比,我们发现AKM和FAEP的量有统计学意义。中位值为:患者AKM为8.75,对照组为10.25 (p = 0.030), FAEP为9.72,10.47,p = 0.003。在LT后的儿童中,这一差异也具有统计学意义:AKM (p = 0.051)和FAEP (p = 0.014)。相比之下,成人患者与对照组,AKM (p = 0.283)和FAEP (p = 0.056)之间无统计学差异,尽管两种细菌的数量都有减少的趋势。结论:在这项初步研究中,我们发现与对照组相比,移植患者体内两种研究细菌的总量有所减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Antibiotic resistance and adherence to clinical guidelines in the Emergency Department. Are we doing it right? MicroRNAs and their role in newborn weight Age dependence of chemical element contents in normal human breast investigated using inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry Use of stem cell-enriched fat grafts in facial reconstruction: have they demonstrated superiority over autologous fat grafting? Cerebral tuberculomas: manifestation of extrapulmonary tuberculosis in an immunocompromised patient. A case report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1