When Time Matters: Federal Changes, Temporality and Recentralization in Brazil*

IF 0.5 4区 社会学 Q3 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Dados-Revista De Ciencias Sociais Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1590/dados.2022.65.2.257
Helder Ferreira do Vale
{"title":"When Time Matters: Federal Changes, Temporality and Recentralization in Brazil*","authors":"Helder Ferreira do Vale","doi":"10.1590/dados.2022.65.2.257","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Much of the scholarly work on Brazilian federalism has long focused on the ways in which decentralization has produced institutional paralysis under intergovernmental conflict. This article, by contrast, suggests that Brazil has been under a gradual transformation since its democratization, which led to a recentralization of power in the hands of the federal government. It presents a framework that explains how an initial decentralization process (1983-1994) turned into a centralization process (1995-2007) that ultimately increased the regulatory and coordination powers of the Brazilian federal government. In addition, the analysis shows that two main blocs of political parties competed to influence the sequence and speed of legislation related to the decentralization and centralization processes. Specifically, these parties used two competing temporal strategies – foot-dragging and pace-setting – to slow down or accelerate the approval of legislation regulating subnational autonomy. Once the centralizing bloc of parties enacted key centralizing legislation, they used the strategy of fence-building to institutionalize intergovernmental relations, thereby consolidating the coordination powers of the center. The main contribution of this article is to advance a temporal approach to federal changes, which explains how the Brazilian federal government centralized authority under a decentralizing Constitution.","PeriodicalId":51809,"journal":{"name":"Dados-Revista De Ciencias Sociais","volume":"48 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dados-Revista De Ciencias Sociais","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/dados.2022.65.2.257","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Much of the scholarly work on Brazilian federalism has long focused on the ways in which decentralization has produced institutional paralysis under intergovernmental conflict. This article, by contrast, suggests that Brazil has been under a gradual transformation since its democratization, which led to a recentralization of power in the hands of the federal government. It presents a framework that explains how an initial decentralization process (1983-1994) turned into a centralization process (1995-2007) that ultimately increased the regulatory and coordination powers of the Brazilian federal government. In addition, the analysis shows that two main blocs of political parties competed to influence the sequence and speed of legislation related to the decentralization and centralization processes. Specifically, these parties used two competing temporal strategies – foot-dragging and pace-setting – to slow down or accelerate the approval of legislation regulating subnational autonomy. Once the centralizing bloc of parties enacted key centralizing legislation, they used the strategy of fence-building to institutionalize intergovernmental relations, thereby consolidating the coordination powers of the center. The main contribution of this article is to advance a temporal approach to federal changes, which explains how the Brazilian federal government centralized authority under a decentralizing Constitution.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
当时间至关重要:巴西的联邦变革、临时性和重新中央集权*
长期以来,许多关于巴西联邦制的学术研究都集中在政府间冲突下,权力下放是如何导致制度瘫痪的。相比之下,这篇文章表明,巴西自民主化以来一直处于逐步转型之中,这导致了联邦政府手中的权力重新集中。它提出了一个框架,解释了最初的分权过程(1983-1994)如何转变为中央集权过程(1995-2007),最终增加了巴西联邦政府的监管和协调权力。此外,分析表明,两个主要政党集团竞相影响与权力下放和中央集权进程有关的立法的顺序和速度。具体来说,这些政党使用了两种相互竞争的时间策略——拖延和设定步调——来减缓或加速地方自治立法的批准。一旦中央集权政党集团制定了关键的中央集权立法,它们就利用筑墙战略使政府间关系制度化,从而巩固了中央的协调权力。本文的主要贡献是提出了联邦改革的时间方法,解释了巴西联邦政府如何在分权宪法下集中权力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Dados-Revista De Ciencias Sociais
Dados-Revista De Ciencias Sociais SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Dados - Revista de Ciências Sociais is a quarterly publication of the Instituto Universitário de Pesquisas do Rio de Janeiro (IUPERJ) aiming at publishing original articles in the area of social sciences. IUPERJ is the social sciences research organ of the Universidade Candido Mendes - UCAM. Opinions and concepdados expressed in signed articles are exclusive responsibility of the authors. Published from 1966, the journal"s abbreviated title is Dados, the form that should be used in bibliographies, footnotes, and bibliographical references and strips.
期刊最新文献
Bancada Feminina e o Aborto: Os Pronunciamentos das Mulheres na Câmara dos Deputados do Brasil e do Uruguai Distinções, Mediações Excludentes e Desigualdades: a Governança da Saúde Reprodutiva de “Cadastradas Difíceis” Preferências e Politização do Judiciário no Brasil Contemporâneo: Uma Análise de Casos de Combate à Corrupção Arranjo Federativo e Desigualdades em Saúde no Brasil e na Argentina Geo-Politizando los Espacios Intermedios del Sistema-Mundo: Semicentros y Semiperiferias, Geoestrategias de Subordinación y de Autonomía en América Latina y Europa Meridional tras la Guerra Fría
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1