Using detrending methods for intelligent processing of construction process monitoring data

IF 0.1 Q4 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY Russian Journal of Building Construction and Architecture Pub Date : 2023-03-24 DOI:10.29039/2308-0191-2022-11-1-12-12
P. Kagan, D. Parshin
{"title":"Using detrending methods for intelligent processing of construction process monitoring data","authors":"P. Kagan, D. Parshin","doi":"10.29039/2308-0191-2022-11-1-12-12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Data processing of monitoring systems of various processes at the stage of construction and operation of buildings requires the development of special tools that belong to the field of artificial intelligence. The trend removal method is one of the ways to preprocess data collected from various sensors and IoT devices that monitor the state of buildings, structures and soil masses during construction and operation. This article analyzes how different approaches to detrending time series affect the performance and accuracy of algorithms for CI computational intelligence models. The analysis compares three approaches: linear detrending, non-linear detrending, and first-order differentiation. \nFive representative methods are used as CI models: DENFIS dynamic evolving fuzzy neural network, GP Gaussian process, MLP multilayer perceptron, OP-ELM optimally trimmed extremal learning machine, and SVM support vector machine. There are three main conclusions from the experiments performed on the four datasets: 1) detrending does not improve overall performance, 2) the empirical mode decomposition method provides better performance than linear detrending, and 3) first-order differentiation in some cases can be effective and in some cases counterproductive for series with common patterns.","PeriodicalId":40951,"journal":{"name":"Russian Journal of Building Construction and Architecture","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Russian Journal of Building Construction and Architecture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29039/2308-0191-2022-11-1-12-12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Data processing of monitoring systems of various processes at the stage of construction and operation of buildings requires the development of special tools that belong to the field of artificial intelligence. The trend removal method is one of the ways to preprocess data collected from various sensors and IoT devices that monitor the state of buildings, structures and soil masses during construction and operation. This article analyzes how different approaches to detrending time series affect the performance and accuracy of algorithms for CI computational intelligence models. The analysis compares three approaches: linear detrending, non-linear detrending, and first-order differentiation. Five representative methods are used as CI models: DENFIS dynamic evolving fuzzy neural network, GP Gaussian process, MLP multilayer perceptron, OP-ELM optimally trimmed extremal learning machine, and SVM support vector machine. There are three main conclusions from the experiments performed on the four datasets: 1) detrending does not improve overall performance, 2) the empirical mode decomposition method provides better performance than linear detrending, and 3) first-order differentiation in some cases can be effective and in some cases counterproductive for series with common patterns.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
应用趋势分析方法对施工过程监测数据进行智能处理
建筑施工和运行阶段各过程监控系统的数据处理需要开发属于人工智能领域的专用工具。趋势去除方法是对各种传感器和物联网设备收集的数据进行预处理的方法之一,这些传感器和物联网设备在施工和运营过程中监测建筑物、结构和土体的状态。本文分析了不同的时间序列去趋势方法如何影响CI计算智能模型算法的性能和准确性。分析比较了三种方法:线性去趋势、非线性去趋势和一阶微分。采用DENFIS动态演化模糊神经网络、GP高斯过程、MLP多层感知器、OP-ELM最优裁剪极值学习机、SVM支持向量机等5种代表性方法作为CI模型。在四个数据集上进行的实验得出了三个主要结论:1)去趋势并不能提高整体性能;2)经验模式分解方法比线性去趋势提供更好的性能;3)一阶微分在某些情况下是有效的,在某些情况下对具有共同模式的序列是适得其反的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Russian Journal of Building Construction and Architecture
Russian Journal of Building Construction and Architecture CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY-
自引率
50.00%
发文量
28
期刊最新文献
Shear Resistance of Gravel Materials for Structural Layers of Road Clothes Effective Protective Coating of Pipe Metal with High-Strength Corrosion-Resistant Material Based on Low-Molecular Oligodiene Analysis of Modern Software for Virtual Construction (4D Modeling) Physico-chemical Methods for Investigating the Effect of the «Mador» Modifier on the Characteristics of Cement Reinforced Material Architectural Concept Modern Oceanographic Complex
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1