Frailty and Cognition Transitions and the Development of Cognitive Frailty among Community-Living Older Adults in the Singapore Longitudinal Ageing Studies

T. Ng, M. Nyunt, Q. Gao, X. Gwee, K. Yap
{"title":"Frailty and Cognition Transitions and the Development of Cognitive Frailty among Community-Living Older Adults in the Singapore Longitudinal Ageing Studies","authors":"T. Ng, M. Nyunt, Q. Gao, X. Gwee, K. Yap","doi":"10.20900/AGMR20190007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Studies of the natural progression and temporal co-occurrence of physical frailty and cognitive impairment are needed to validate the construct of cognitive frailty, a state of mild cognitive impairment caused by physical frailty. Method: We analysed data from Singapore Longitudinal Ageing Studies (SLAS-1 and SLAS-2) participants (N = 2554), free of functional disability, dementia, neurodegenerative diseases, and stroke, who were categorized at baseline as robust and cognitive normal (N = 1252), physically frail alone (N = 913), cognitively impaired alone (N = 197), and concurrently frail and cognitively impaired (N = 232) with average 5-years of follow up. Physical frailty was defined as pre-frailty/frailty (Fried criteria scores 1–5) and cognitive impairment MMSE scores <27 (age and education adjusted). Results: Among cognitively normal and robust participants, the occurrence of pre-frailty/frailty alone was 80.4%, cognitive impairment alone was 0.6%, and co-occurring pre-frailty/frailty and cognitive impairment (cognitive frailty) was 3.8%. Among cognitively normal and pre-frail/frail participants, the occurrence of cognitive frailty (5.9%) was significantly higher (OR = 1.53, 95% CI 1.02–2.28, adjusted for sex and age). Among cognitively normal and robust individuals, baseline number of comorbid medical comorbidities (OR = 1.37 (95% CI: 1.08–1.74) significantly predicted cognitive frailty. From following up a hypothetical cohort of 1000 robust and cognitively normal individuals, 88 of 91 outcome cases of co-occurring frailty and cognitive impairment were preceded by frailty alone (N = 48), or concurrent frailty and cognitive impairment (N = 40); only 3 cases were preceded by cognitive impairment alone (not cognitive frailty).Conclusions: The validity of cognitive frailty as a construct of mild cognitive impairment due to physical frailty is supported.","PeriodicalId":72094,"journal":{"name":"Advances in geriatric medicine and research","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in geriatric medicine and research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20900/AGMR20190007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Studies of the natural progression and temporal co-occurrence of physical frailty and cognitive impairment are needed to validate the construct of cognitive frailty, a state of mild cognitive impairment caused by physical frailty. Method: We analysed data from Singapore Longitudinal Ageing Studies (SLAS-1 and SLAS-2) participants (N = 2554), free of functional disability, dementia, neurodegenerative diseases, and stroke, who were categorized at baseline as robust and cognitive normal (N = 1252), physically frail alone (N = 913), cognitively impaired alone (N = 197), and concurrently frail and cognitively impaired (N = 232) with average 5-years of follow up. Physical frailty was defined as pre-frailty/frailty (Fried criteria scores 1–5) and cognitive impairment MMSE scores <27 (age and education adjusted). Results: Among cognitively normal and robust participants, the occurrence of pre-frailty/frailty alone was 80.4%, cognitive impairment alone was 0.6%, and co-occurring pre-frailty/frailty and cognitive impairment (cognitive frailty) was 3.8%. Among cognitively normal and pre-frail/frail participants, the occurrence of cognitive frailty (5.9%) was significantly higher (OR = 1.53, 95% CI 1.02–2.28, adjusted for sex and age). Among cognitively normal and robust individuals, baseline number of comorbid medical comorbidities (OR = 1.37 (95% CI: 1.08–1.74) significantly predicted cognitive frailty. From following up a hypothetical cohort of 1000 robust and cognitively normal individuals, 88 of 91 outcome cases of co-occurring frailty and cognitive impairment were preceded by frailty alone (N = 48), or concurrent frailty and cognitive impairment (N = 40); only 3 cases were preceded by cognitive impairment alone (not cognitive frailty).Conclusions: The validity of cognitive frailty as a construct of mild cognitive impairment due to physical frailty is supported.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新加坡纵向老龄化研究中社区生活老年人的衰弱和认知转变以及认知衰弱的发展
背景:需要对身体虚弱和认知障碍的自然进展和时间共现进行研究,以验证认知虚弱这一由身体虚弱引起的轻度认知障碍状态的概念。方法:我们分析了来自新加坡纵向老龄化研究(SLAS-1和SLAS-2)参与者(N = 2554)的数据,这些参与者没有功能障碍、痴呆、神经退行性疾病和中风,他们在基线时被分类为健康和认知正常(N = 1252)、身体虚弱(N = 913)、单独认知受损(N = 197)和虚弱和认知受损(N = 232),平均随访5年。身体虚弱被定义为虚弱前/虚弱(Fried标准评分1-5)和认知障碍MMSE评分<27(年龄和教育调整)。结果:在认知正常和健康的参与者中,单独出现前虚弱/虚弱的发生率为80.4%,单独出现认知障碍的发生率为0.6%,同时出现前虚弱/虚弱和认知障碍(认知衰弱)的发生率为3.8%。在认知正常和体弱/体弱前参与者中,认知衰弱的发生率(5.9%)显著较高(OR = 1.53, 95% CI 1.02-2.28,经性别和年龄调整)。在认知正常和健壮的个体中,共病医学共病的基线数量(OR = 1.37 (95% CI: 1.08-1.74)显著预测认知衰弱。通过对1000名健康和认知正常个体的假设随访,91例同时发生虚弱和认知障碍的结果病例中有88例单独出现虚弱(N = 48),或同时出现虚弱和认知障碍(N = 40);仅有3例患者有单独的认知障碍(非认知衰弱)。结论:认知虚弱作为身体虚弱引起的轻度认知障碍的构念是有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Weakness Status is Differentially Associated with Time to Diabetes in Americans Falls and Alzheimer Disease. Meta-Analysis-Based Comparison of Annual Fall Risk between Older Adults with Alzheimer's Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment. Sarcopenia as a Preoperative Risk Stratification Tool among Older Adults with Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Memory Loss and Missteps: Investigating Fall Risks in Alzheimer's and Dementia Patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1