Nonparametric Testing for Information Asymmetry in the Mortgage Servicing Market

Helmi Jedidi, G. Dionne
{"title":"Nonparametric Testing for Information Asymmetry in the Mortgage Servicing Market","authors":"Helmi Jedidi, G. Dionne","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3351417","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Our main objective is to test for evidence of information asymmetry in the mortgage servicing market. Does the sale of mortgage servicing rights (MSR) by the initial lender to a second servicing institution unveil any residual asymmetric information? We analyze the originator’s selling choice of MSR using a large sample of U.S. mortgages that were privately securitized during the period of January 2000 to December 2013 (more than 5 million observations). Our econometric methodology is mainly non-parametric and the main test for the presence of information asymmetry is driven by kernel density estimation techniques (Su and Spindler, 2013). We also employ the non-parametric testing procedure of Chiappori and Salanie (2000). For robustness, we present parametric tests to corroborate our results after controlling for observable risk characteristics, for econometric misspecification error, and for endogeneity issues using instrumental variables. Our empirical results provide strong support for the presence of second-stage asymmetric information in the mortgage servicing market.","PeriodicalId":11744,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Nonparametric Methods (Topic)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Nonparametric Methods (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3351417","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Our main objective is to test for evidence of information asymmetry in the mortgage servicing market. Does the sale of mortgage servicing rights (MSR) by the initial lender to a second servicing institution unveil any residual asymmetric information? We analyze the originator’s selling choice of MSR using a large sample of U.S. mortgages that were privately securitized during the period of January 2000 to December 2013 (more than 5 million observations). Our econometric methodology is mainly non-parametric and the main test for the presence of information asymmetry is driven by kernel density estimation techniques (Su and Spindler, 2013). We also employ the non-parametric testing procedure of Chiappori and Salanie (2000). For robustness, we present parametric tests to corroborate our results after controlling for observable risk characteristics, for econometric misspecification error, and for endogeneity issues using instrumental variables. Our empirical results provide strong support for the presence of second-stage asymmetric information in the mortgage servicing market.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
抵押贷款服务市场信息不对称的非参数检验
我们的主要目标是测试抵押贷款服务市场中信息不对称的证据。最初贷款人向第二服务机构出售抵押服务权(MSR)是否揭示了任何剩余的不对称信息?我们使用2000年1月至2013年12月期间私人证券化的大量美国抵押贷款样本(超过500万份观察结果)来分析发起人对MSR的销售选择。我们的计量经济学方法主要是非参数的,对信息不对称存在的主要检验是由核密度估计技术驱动的(Su和Spindler, 2013)。我们还采用了Chiappori和Salanie(2000)的非参数检验程序。为了稳健性,在控制了可观察的风险特征、计量经济学错误规范误差和使用工具变量的内生性问题后,我们提出了参数检验来证实我们的结果。我们的实证结果为抵押贷款服务市场存在第二阶段信息不对称提供了强有力的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Efficient Estimation of Pricing Kernels and Market-Implied Densities Futures-Trading Activity and Jump Risk: Evidence From the Bitcoin Market Partial Identification of Discrete Instrumental Variable Models using Shape Restrictions Frequency Dependent Risk Spatial Heterogeneity in the Borrowers' Mortgage Termination Decision – a Nonparametric Approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1