Towards coupling dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction with hollow fibre liquid phase microextraction for extraction of organic pollutants of agricultural origin
{"title":"Towards coupling dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction with hollow fibre liquid phase microextraction for extraction of organic pollutants of agricultural origin","authors":"Thabiso Letseka, Mosotho J. George","doi":"10.1016/j.ancr.2016.11.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Liquid-based miniaturized techniques have received a lot of attention recently resulting in the development of the liquid phase microextraction (LPME) and dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (DLLME) techniques each offering unique benefits over the other technique. Herein we report a combination of the two techniques for the extraction of hexestrol and atrazine from aqueous systems. The method sets off with the DLLME thereafter a hollow fibre filled with the organic solvent is introduced for the extraction of the pre-extracted analytes in the dispersed organic solvent. The method was modified further by introducing a second extracting solvent in place of the disperser solvent. Under the optimum conditions, namely, toluene in the acceptor phase, 1:1 chloroform:toluene (v/v) as a dispersed solvent, 15% NaCl, with the 15 min extraction time, the method achieved satisfactory enrichment factors (87- and 62-fold); sufficiently low detection limits of 0.018 μg/mL and 0.016 μg/mL using the flame ionization detector, while 0.072 and 0.063 ng/mL were obtained using single ion monitoring mass spectrometry detector, for atrazine and hexestrol, respectively; with sufficient linearity (R<sup>2</sup> ≥ 0.9959). Although the compounds were not detected in the river water sample, satisfactory recoveries (111–115%) were achieved indicating the method did not suffer any negative matrix effect.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7819,"journal":{"name":"Analytical Chemistry Research","volume":"10 ","pages":"Pages 28-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ancr.2016.11.001","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analytical Chemistry Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214181216300441","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17
Abstract
Liquid-based miniaturized techniques have received a lot of attention recently resulting in the development of the liquid phase microextraction (LPME) and dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (DLLME) techniques each offering unique benefits over the other technique. Herein we report a combination of the two techniques for the extraction of hexestrol and atrazine from aqueous systems. The method sets off with the DLLME thereafter a hollow fibre filled with the organic solvent is introduced for the extraction of the pre-extracted analytes in the dispersed organic solvent. The method was modified further by introducing a second extracting solvent in place of the disperser solvent. Under the optimum conditions, namely, toluene in the acceptor phase, 1:1 chloroform:toluene (v/v) as a dispersed solvent, 15% NaCl, with the 15 min extraction time, the method achieved satisfactory enrichment factors (87- and 62-fold); sufficiently low detection limits of 0.018 μg/mL and 0.016 μg/mL using the flame ionization detector, while 0.072 and 0.063 ng/mL were obtained using single ion monitoring mass spectrometry detector, for atrazine and hexestrol, respectively; with sufficient linearity (R2 ≥ 0.9959). Although the compounds were not detected in the river water sample, satisfactory recoveries (111–115%) were achieved indicating the method did not suffer any negative matrix effect.