THE INVESTMENT CERTIFICATES IN THE ITALIAN MARKET: A COMPARISON OF QUOTED AND ESTIMATED PRICES

Q3 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Journal of Financial Management Markets and Institutions Pub Date : 2019-07-26 DOI:10.1142/S2282717X19500026
Brando Viganò, S. Vitali, S. Vitali, Vittorio Moriggia, Giovanna Zanotti
{"title":"THE INVESTMENT CERTIFICATES IN THE ITALIAN MARKET: A COMPARISON OF QUOTED AND ESTIMATED PRICES","authors":"Brando Viganò, S. Vitali, S. Vitali, Vittorio Moriggia, Giovanna Zanotti","doi":"10.1142/S2282717X19500026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Investment certificates are securitized derivatives built as a combination of financial instruments. The financial engineering process aims to create new payoff profiles that allow investors to diversify or to hedge the risk of their portfolios. Such instruments are relatively challenging to price, as highlighted in the recent publications for other European markets. The aim of this paper is to analyze whether in the Italian market there are also differences between the quoted price and the estimated price obtained applying a standard pricing approach well known in the literature. In particular, we analyze three representative certificates, belonging to the classes of target coupon certificates and autocallable certificates, that have been most appreciated by the investors during the last years. To evaluate the price, we propose a Monte Carlo approach that computes directly the payoff of the certificates on a set of scenarios for the evolution of the underlying asset. Moreover, studying the payoff profile of the certificates, we investigate and comment on the recent regulatory debate on “complexity”. We show that complexity, the new parameter behind return and risk, should not be necessarily associated with the engineering level of the financial products and that, sometimes, complexity is not associated with risk.","PeriodicalId":34440,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Financial Management Markets and Institutions","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Financial Management Markets and Institutions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/S2282717X19500026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Investment certificates are securitized derivatives built as a combination of financial instruments. The financial engineering process aims to create new payoff profiles that allow investors to diversify or to hedge the risk of their portfolios. Such instruments are relatively challenging to price, as highlighted in the recent publications for other European markets. The aim of this paper is to analyze whether in the Italian market there are also differences between the quoted price and the estimated price obtained applying a standard pricing approach well known in the literature. In particular, we analyze three representative certificates, belonging to the classes of target coupon certificates and autocallable certificates, that have been most appreciated by the investors during the last years. To evaluate the price, we propose a Monte Carlo approach that computes directly the payoff of the certificates on a set of scenarios for the evolution of the underlying asset. Moreover, studying the payoff profile of the certificates, we investigate and comment on the recent regulatory debate on “complexity”. We show that complexity, the new parameter behind return and risk, should not be necessarily associated with the engineering level of the financial products and that, sometimes, complexity is not associated with risk.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
意大利市场的投资证书:报价和估价的比较
投资凭证是作为金融工具组合而成的证券化衍生品。金融工程流程旨在创建新的收益概况,使投资者能够分散投资组合或对冲其投资组合的风险。正如最近针对其他欧洲市场的出版物所强调的那样,这些工具的定价相对具有挑战性。本文的目的是分析在意大利市场是否也有报价和估计价格之间的差异应用标准定价方法在文献中众所周知。我们特别分析了三种代表性的证券,它们分别属于目标息票证券和可自动赎回证券,这三种证券在过去几年中最受投资者的青睐。为了评估价格,我们提出了一种蒙特卡罗方法,该方法直接计算基础资产演变的一组场景下证书的收益。此外,研究了证书的收益概况,我们调查和评论了最近关于“复杂性”的监管辩论。我们展示了复杂性,回报和风险背后的新参数,不应该必然与金融产品的工程水平相关联,有时,复杂性与风险无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Financial Management Markets and Institutions
Journal of Financial Management Markets and Institutions Economics, Econometrics and Finance-General Economics, Econometrics and Finance
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Analysing banks' performance during the recent breakdowns. Which were its main drivers? Sustainability Reporting: Evidence From Global Systemically Important Banks (G-SIBs) Risk Mapping as a Form of Banking Immunity Response to Covid-19 Pandemic Green Finance: past, present and future studies The Impact of SFAS166/167 on Bank Liquidity and Lending
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1