Ethics of behavior modification: Behavioral and medical psychology

Nancy K. Innis
{"title":"Ethics of behavior modification: Behavioral and medical psychology","authors":"Nancy K. Innis","doi":"10.1016/0271-5392(81)90028-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>There appear to be two separate, although related, ethical issues with respect to behavior modification. The first, which involves defining and establishing the rules of conduct within which the practitioner must work, is common to all forms of therapy. The second, and more controversial, issue has developed out of a concern about the use of scientific methods to change human behavior. This paper examines some of the general ethical problems faced by behavior modifiers, with special emphasis on the problems which have resulted from an empirical and objective approach to behavior change. For example, the use of aversive stimuli and the institution of token economies have been widely criticized. It is suggested that many behavior modification procedures and their consequences have been misunderstood or even misrepresented, giving behavior modification an underserved bad reputation. The education of the general public as to what behavior modification entails is an obvious first step. The development of joint experimental-applied programs for training behavior modifiers is also encouraged. Practitioners with this type of training, aware of recent changes in the basic principles of learning theory, may be better prepared to develop new behavioral treatment procedures which will be less open to criticism and more acceptable to the general public.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":79378,"journal":{"name":"Social science & medicine. Part F, Medical & social ethics","volume":"15 1","pages":"Pages 69-73"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1981-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0271-5392(81)90028-9","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social science & medicine. Part F, Medical & social ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0271539281900289","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

There appear to be two separate, although related, ethical issues with respect to behavior modification. The first, which involves defining and establishing the rules of conduct within which the practitioner must work, is common to all forms of therapy. The second, and more controversial, issue has developed out of a concern about the use of scientific methods to change human behavior. This paper examines some of the general ethical problems faced by behavior modifiers, with special emphasis on the problems which have resulted from an empirical and objective approach to behavior change. For example, the use of aversive stimuli and the institution of token economies have been widely criticized. It is suggested that many behavior modification procedures and their consequences have been misunderstood or even misrepresented, giving behavior modification an underserved bad reputation. The education of the general public as to what behavior modification entails is an obvious first step. The development of joint experimental-applied programs for training behavior modifiers is also encouraged. Practitioners with this type of training, aware of recent changes in the basic principles of learning theory, may be better prepared to develop new behavioral treatment procedures which will be less open to criticism and more acceptable to the general public.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
行为矫正的伦理学:行为与医学心理学。
在行为矫正方面,似乎有两个独立但相关的伦理问题。第一,包括定义和建立从业人员必须遵守的行为规则,这是所有形式的治疗所共有的。第二个问题,也是更有争议的问题,源于人们对利用科学方法改变人类行为的担忧。本文探讨了行为修正者所面临的一些一般伦理问题,特别强调了行为改变的经验和客观方法所产生的问题。例如,使用厌恶刺激和代币经济制度受到了广泛的批评。有人认为,许多行为矫正程序及其后果被误解,甚至被歪曲,给行为矫正一个服务不足的坏名声。对公众进行教育,让他们了解行为矫正需要做些什么,显然是第一步。同时也鼓励发展行为矫正者训练的联合实验应用计划。接受过这类培训的从业人员,意识到学习理论基本原则的最新变化,可能会更好地准备开发新的行为治疗程序,这些程序将较少受到批评,更容易为公众所接受。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Justice and a universal right to basic health care. What is the obligation of the medical profession in the distribution of health care? Triage in medical practices: an unacceptable model? The involuntary commitment and treatment of mentally ill persons. The right of public access to cadaver organs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1