The Role of Warhol’s Brillo soap boxes on the Contemporary Aesthetics, based on the “Applied Ontology” Theory of Roger Pouivet

Hoda Zabolinezhad, Parisa Shad Qazvini
{"title":"The Role of Warhol’s Brillo soap boxes on the Contemporary Aesthetics, based on the “Applied Ontology” Theory of Roger Pouivet","authors":"Hoda Zabolinezhad, Parisa Shad Qazvini","doi":"10.14483/21450706.18304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper, based on Roger Pouivet’s “applied ontology” theory, studies the effect of Warhol’s Brillo soap boxes, a work that could not convince the art world, when it was first shown, to accept it as an art piece. We strive to answer two questions: In the contemporary age, what aesthetic criteria turn a human-made work into an artwork? And deriving from Pouivete’s “applied ontology” theory, how is a contemporary artwork considered as the personal symbols of the artist and how are the aesthetic characteristics of the work received? An artwork in any style, form and content, includes contextual and formal symbols. In the contemporary age, this becomes a mix of personal symbols and already known collective symbols of a culture that together play a defining role in the creation of the artwork. In other words, a work will be recognized as an artwork when it is the subject of arguments among art experts, even without needing to reach any consensus.","PeriodicalId":41194,"journal":{"name":"Calle 14-Revista de investigacion en el Campo del Arte","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Calle 14-Revista de investigacion en el Campo del Arte","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14483/21450706.18304","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper, based on Roger Pouivet’s “applied ontology” theory, studies the effect of Warhol’s Brillo soap boxes, a work that could not convince the art world, when it was first shown, to accept it as an art piece. We strive to answer two questions: In the contemporary age, what aesthetic criteria turn a human-made work into an artwork? And deriving from Pouivete’s “applied ontology” theory, how is a contemporary artwork considered as the personal symbols of the artist and how are the aesthetic characteristics of the work received? An artwork in any style, form and content, includes contextual and formal symbols. In the contemporary age, this becomes a mix of personal symbols and already known collective symbols of a culture that together play a defining role in the creation of the artwork. In other words, a work will be recognized as an artwork when it is the subject of arguments among art experts, even without needing to reach any consensus.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
沃霍尔的布里洛肥皂盒在当代美学中的作用——基于罗杰·普维的“应用本体论”理论
本文以Roger Pouivet的“应用本体论”理论为基础,研究沃霍尔的《布里洛肥皂盒》(Brillo soap boxes)的效果,这是一件在首次展出时无法说服艺术界接受它作为艺术品的作品。我们努力回答两个问题:在当代,什么样的审美标准使人造作品成为艺术品?从普维特的“应用本体论”出发,当代艺术作品如何被视为艺术家的个人符号,作品的美学特征如何被接受?任何风格、形式和内容的艺术品都包括上下文和形式符号。在当代,这变成了一种个人符号和已知的文化集体符号的混合,它们在艺术创作中共同发挥着决定性的作用。换句话说,即使没有达成任何共识,只要成为艺术专家争论的对象,就会被认定为艺术品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
3 weeks
期刊最新文献
El archivo performado: el repertorio documental de la historia reciente chilena actualizado en las lecciones de traducción de Voluspa Jarpa Excluidos y discapacitados: el cuestionamiento del orden social en la fotografía de Joel Peter Witkin Feminismo popular y teatro comunitario. El liderazgo de las mujeres, clave del desarrollo del teatro comunitario Disciplinamiento y vida. Jonathan Crary y la producción de la aisthesis Agua, locura y feminidad: La representación de la mujer en el cine de ficción
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1