The Shift to Online Engagement: Exploring Online Engagement Platforms and Tools

Rebecca Poschmann
{"title":"The Shift to Online Engagement: Exploring Online Engagement Platforms and Tools","authors":"Rebecca Poschmann","doi":"10.18848/2325-1662/cgp/v16i01/41-54","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Public engagement is a crucial part to a public project as it gives citizens the opportunity to become involved in the decision-making process as well as provide decision-makers with valuable information from those impacted by the project. How the public is involved and when is crucial to those participating earning trust and supporting the project. Over the course of 2020, how people engaged on urban planning projects evolved quickly and drastically due to the surge of the COVID-19 virus. Prior to this time, most public engagement sessions were held in person as this allowed the public to connect with subject matter experts and engage with the people who could initiate the changes they were suggesting. However, following the global outbreak of the virus, the ability to bring people together in a common space disappeared while the online rooms appeared. With platforms such as Zoom and Bang the Table making it possible for “in person” meetings to continue, have they allowed for effective public engagement to take place? This article explores the number of tools that are required to host effective online engagement as well as compare the activities that can take place in-person to their online counterpart.","PeriodicalId":38255,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Architectonic, Spatial, and Environmental Design","volume":"60 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Architectonic, Spatial, and Environmental Design","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18848/2325-1662/cgp/v16i01/41-54","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Public engagement is a crucial part to a public project as it gives citizens the opportunity to become involved in the decision-making process as well as provide decision-makers with valuable information from those impacted by the project. How the public is involved and when is crucial to those participating earning trust and supporting the project. Over the course of 2020, how people engaged on urban planning projects evolved quickly and drastically due to the surge of the COVID-19 virus. Prior to this time, most public engagement sessions were held in person as this allowed the public to connect with subject matter experts and engage with the people who could initiate the changes they were suggesting. However, following the global outbreak of the virus, the ability to bring people together in a common space disappeared while the online rooms appeared. With platforms such as Zoom and Bang the Table making it possible for “in person” meetings to continue, have they allowed for effective public engagement to take place? This article explores the number of tools that are required to host effective online engagement as well as compare the activities that can take place in-person to their online counterpart.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
转向在线参与:探索在线参与平台和工具
公众参与是公共项目的重要组成部分,因为它使公民有机会参与决策过程,并向决策者提供受项目影响的有价值的信息。公众如何参与,何时参与,对于参与者赢得信任和支持项目至关重要。在2020年期间,由于COVID-19病毒的激增,人们参与城市规划项目的方式发生了迅速而巨大的变化。在此之前,大多数公众参与会议都是亲自举行的,因为这允许公众与主题专家联系,并与可以发起他们所建议的变革的人接触。然而,随着病毒的全球爆发,将人们聚集在一个共同空间的能力消失了,而在线房间出现了。随着Zoom和Bang the Table等平台让“面对面”会议得以继续,它们是否允许有效的公众参与?本文探讨了托管有效的在线参与所需的工具数量,并比较了可以亲自进行的活动与在线活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Architectonic, Spatial, and Environmental Design
International Journal of Architectonic, Spatial, and Environmental Design Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: The primary interests of The International Journal of Architectonic, Spatial, and Environmental Design are in building design, landscape design, and sustainable design practices. As well as papers of a traditional scholarly type, this journal invites presentations of practice—including experimental forms of documentation and exegeses that can be interrogated with equal validity through a process of academic peer review. For instance, this might take the form of a series of images and plans, with explanatory notes that articulate with other, significantly similar or different—and explicitly referenced—places, sites, or material objects.
期刊最新文献
Blurring Binaries: A Queer Approach to Architecture through Embodied Connection Determining the Impact of Syrian Refugees on the Urban Host Communities in Jordan: An Analytical Study of the Za’atari Region Evaluating Adaptive Reuse Potential of Abandoned Factories in India: A Case of Mangalore Tile Factories along the Malabar Coast How Geometrical Decorations of Vaulted Ceilings in Traditional Iranian Houses Depict the Concept of Human Chakras: A Case Study of Traditional Houses of Kashan, Iran Exploring Visual Biophilic Interior Design Features in Homes: An Experimental Study through a Virtual Environment Design
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1