The European Energy Policy – A Framework For Decreasing The Gap Between Member States. Is The Energy Market Liberalization A Sustainable Approach Or An Ongoing Risk?

Andrada Văsii
{"title":"The European Energy Policy – A Framework For Decreasing The Gap Between Member States. Is The Energy Market Liberalization A Sustainable Approach Or An Ongoing Risk?","authors":"Andrada Văsii","doi":"10.25019/EUROPOLITY.2017.11.1.07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Energy independence was a long-time dream of European Member States, thus numerous regulations and actions were designed specific for its implementation. In a society characterized by constant evolution, energy independence is regarded as a proof of the existence of coherent supranational strategies, but also as a necessary effort that is to be unravelled at national level. Unlike the first actions in the energy sector, the current market is the expression of a competitive space that has adapted an approach depending upon efficiency and sustainability. In this paper, I present, using a macro-level approach, the transformations of the European energy market and the challenges that arise. I examine both the actions that lead to the liberalization efforts, as well as the disparities that characterize the Member States involved in this process. Therefore, I question the process of liberalization of the energy market as being a straight-forward one and I investigate the variables (such as types of energy and national energy strategies) that directly influence this process. This aim of this paper is to offer insights, using both a quantitative and a qualitative approach, in the way in which the liberalization process ought to occur, and elaborate on the country-specific factors that affect it, making liberalization a process characterized by vulnerabilities.","PeriodicalId":40359,"journal":{"name":"Europolity-Continuity and Change in European Governance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Europolity-Continuity and Change in European Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25019/EUROPOLITY.2017.11.1.07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Energy independence was a long-time dream of European Member States, thus numerous regulations and actions were designed specific for its implementation. In a society characterized by constant evolution, energy independence is regarded as a proof of the existence of coherent supranational strategies, but also as a necessary effort that is to be unravelled at national level. Unlike the first actions in the energy sector, the current market is the expression of a competitive space that has adapted an approach depending upon efficiency and sustainability. In this paper, I present, using a macro-level approach, the transformations of the European energy market and the challenges that arise. I examine both the actions that lead to the liberalization efforts, as well as the disparities that characterize the Member States involved in this process. Therefore, I question the process of liberalization of the energy market as being a straight-forward one and I investigate the variables (such as types of energy and national energy strategies) that directly influence this process. This aim of this paper is to offer insights, using both a quantitative and a qualitative approach, in the way in which the liberalization process ought to occur, and elaborate on the country-specific factors that affect it, making liberalization a process characterized by vulnerabilities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧洲能源政策-减少成员国之间差距的框架。能源市场自由化是一个可持续的途径还是一个持续的风险?
能源独立是欧洲成员国长期以来的梦想,因此专门为实现这一梦想制定了许多条例和行动。在一个以不断发展为特征的社会中,能源独立被视为存在连贯的超国家战略的证明,但也是在国家一级展开的必要努力。与能源领域的第一次行动不同,目前的市场是一个竞争空间的表现,它已经适应了一种依赖于效率和可持续性的方法。在本文中,我使用宏观层面的方法,介绍了欧洲能源市场的转型以及由此产生的挑战。我将审查导致自由化努力的行动,以及参与这一进程的会员国所特有的差异。因此,我质疑能源市场自由化的过程是一个直截了当的过程,我调查了直接影响这一过程的变量(如能源类型和国家能源战略)。本文的目的是利用定量和定性的方法,就自由化进程应该如何进行提出见解,并详细说明影响自由化进程的具体国家因素,使自由化成为一个以脆弱性为特征的进程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
BOOK REVIEW Manuel DeLanda, 2016, Assemblage Theory, Edinburgh, Edinburgh University Press. ISBN Paperback 9781474413633 THE ROLE OF THE EURO IN STRENGHTENING THE EUROPEAN IDENTITY MIGRATION BETWEEN LATIN AMERICA AND THE UNITED STATES IN 2015-2018. DIFFERENCES IN IMMIGRATION POLICIES BETWEEN THE OBAMA AND TRUMP ADMINISTRATIONS THE EUROPEAN UNION’S APPROACH TOWARDS THE ENTRY OF THIRD-COUNTRY NATIONALS INTO ITS TERRITORY DEMOCRATIC BACKSLIDING: LESSONS TO BE LEARNED FROM POLAND
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1