ESG disclosure and firm performance before and after IR

Khaldoon Albitar, K. Hussainey, Nasir Kolade, A. Gerged
{"title":"ESG disclosure and firm performance before and after IR","authors":"Khaldoon Albitar, K. Hussainey, Nasir Kolade, A. Gerged","doi":"10.1108/IJAIM-09-2019-0108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis paper aims to investigate the effect of environmental, social and governance disclosure (ESGD) on firm performance (FP) before and after the introduction of integrated reporting (IR) further to exploring a potential moderation effect of corporate governance mechanisms on this relationship.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nOrdinary least squares and firm-fixed effects models were estimated based on data related to FTSE 350 between 2009 and 2018. The data has been mainly collected from Bloomberg and Capital IQ. This analysis was supplemented with applying a two-stage least squares (2 SLS) model to address any concerns regarding the expected occurrence of endogeneity problems.\n\n\nFindings\nThe results show a positive and significant relationship between ESGD score and FP before and after 2013, among a sample of FTSE 350. Furthermore, the study is suggestive of a moderation effect of corporate governance mechanisms (i.e. ownership concentration, gender diversity and board size) on the ESGD-FP nexus. Additionally, this paper finds that firms voluntarily associated with IR have a tendency to achieve better firm financial performance.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe findings of the present study have several policy and practitioner implications. For example, managers may engage in ESGD to enhance their firms’ financial performance by the voluntary involvement in IR, which believed to help investors to rationalise their investment decisions. Likewise, the results reiterate the crucial need to integrate more social, environmental and economic regulations to promote sustainability in the UK. The paper also offers a systematic picture for policymakers in the UK as well as future researchers.\n\n\nSocial implications\nThe findings of this paper indicate that IR plays a significant role in the relationship between ESGD and FP, where IR firms seemed to be achieving better FP as compared with their non-IR counterparts. This implies that stakeholders may have played a magnificent effort to encourage firms’ voluntary engagement in IR in the UK.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nTo the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first study to explore the potential moderating effect of ownership concentration, gender diversity and board size on the relationship between ESGD and FP and to examine whether firms’ voluntary involvement in IR can lead to better FP after the introduction of IR in 2013 in the UK.\n","PeriodicalId":46371,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Accounting and Information Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"114","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Accounting and Information Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/IJAIM-09-2019-0108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 114

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to investigate the effect of environmental, social and governance disclosure (ESGD) on firm performance (FP) before and after the introduction of integrated reporting (IR) further to exploring a potential moderation effect of corporate governance mechanisms on this relationship. Design/methodology/approach Ordinary least squares and firm-fixed effects models were estimated based on data related to FTSE 350 between 2009 and 2018. The data has been mainly collected from Bloomberg and Capital IQ. This analysis was supplemented with applying a two-stage least squares (2 SLS) model to address any concerns regarding the expected occurrence of endogeneity problems. Findings The results show a positive and significant relationship between ESGD score and FP before and after 2013, among a sample of FTSE 350. Furthermore, the study is suggestive of a moderation effect of corporate governance mechanisms (i.e. ownership concentration, gender diversity and board size) on the ESGD-FP nexus. Additionally, this paper finds that firms voluntarily associated with IR have a tendency to achieve better firm financial performance. Practical implications The findings of the present study have several policy and practitioner implications. For example, managers may engage in ESGD to enhance their firms’ financial performance by the voluntary involvement in IR, which believed to help investors to rationalise their investment decisions. Likewise, the results reiterate the crucial need to integrate more social, environmental and economic regulations to promote sustainability in the UK. The paper also offers a systematic picture for policymakers in the UK as well as future researchers. Social implications The findings of this paper indicate that IR plays a significant role in the relationship between ESGD and FP, where IR firms seemed to be achieving better FP as compared with their non-IR counterparts. This implies that stakeholders may have played a magnificent effort to encourage firms’ voluntary engagement in IR in the UK. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first study to explore the potential moderating effect of ownership concentration, gender diversity and board size on the relationship between ESGD and FP and to examine whether firms’ voluntary involvement in IR can lead to better FP after the introduction of IR in 2013 in the UK.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ESG披露与IR前后公司绩效
本文旨在探讨引入综合报告(IR)前后环境、社会和治理披露(ESGD)对公司绩效(FP)的影响,进一步探讨公司治理机制对这种关系的潜在调节作用。设计/方法/方法普通最小二乘法和企业固定效应模型是根据2009年至2018年富时350指数相关数据估计的。数据主要来自Bloomberg和Capital IQ。该分析通过应用两阶段最小二乘(2sls)模型进行补充,以解决有关内生性问题预期发生的任何担忧。结果表明,在2013年前后,富时350指数样本中,ESGD得分与FP之间存在显著的正相关关系。此外,该研究还提出了公司治理机制(即所有权集中度、性别多样性和董事会规模)对ESGD-FP关系的调节作用。此外,本文还发现,自愿参与企业内部投资的企业往往会获得更好的财务绩效。实际意义本研究的结果具有若干政策和实践意义。例如,管理人员可能会通过自愿参与IR来参与ESGD以提高公司的财务绩效,这被认为有助于投资者合理化他们的投资决策。同样,研究结果再次表明,英国迫切需要整合更多的社会、环境和经济法规,以促进可持续发展。这篇论文还为英国的政策制定者和未来的研究人员提供了一幅系统的图景。社会意义本文的研究结果表明,IR在ESGD和FP之间的关系中起着重要作用,其中IR公司似乎比非IR公司实现了更好的FP。这意味着,在英国,利益相关者可能在鼓励企业自愿参与企业内部关系方面做出了巨大的努力。原创性/价值据作者所知,这是第一个探讨所有权集中度、性别多样性和董事会规模对ESGD和计划生育之间关系的潜在调节作用的研究,也是第一个研究在2013年英国引入计划生育后,公司自愿参与计划生育是否能带来更好的计划生育的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
3.00%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Accounting & Information Management focuses on publishing research in accounting, finance, and information management. It specifically emphasizes the interaction between these research areas on an international scale and within both the private and public sectors. The aim of the journal is to bridge the knowledge gap between researchers and practitioners by covering various issues that arise in the field. These include information systems, accounting information management, innovation and technology in accounting, accounting standards and reporting, and capital market efficiency.
期刊最新文献
Forward-looking disclosure tone in the chairman’s statement: obfuscation or truthful explanations Do shareholders appreciate the audit committee and auditor moderation? Evidence from sustainability reporting The effect of IFRS convergence on risk disclosure: an investigation into the Indian accounting system The effect of corporate governance, corporate social responsibility and information asymmetry on the value of Indonesian-listed firms Does CSR reduce financial distress? Moderating effect of firm characteristics, auditor characteristics, and covid-19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1