Regional Inequality in the Federal Budget Execution in Russian Regions

IF 5.6 2区 经济学 Q1 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES Cambridge Journal of Regions Economy and Society Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.17059/ekon.reg.2023-1-21
L. Mokhnatkina
{"title":"Regional Inequality in the Federal Budget Execution in Russian Regions","authors":"L. Mokhnatkina","doi":"10.17059/ekon.reg.2023-1-21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Federal budget expenditures in regions are not reduced to intergovernmental fiscal transfers to the budgets of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation. A significant part of the federal budget is spent directly in regions to support the expenditure commitments of the Russian Federation. The study aims to describe inter-territorial redistribution of financial resources and assess the contribution of the federal budget to regional per capita consumption by analysing data on 76 Russian constituent entities for 2016-2019. The article ranks regions according to the indicators of the federal budget per capita, estimates the ratio of federal and regional budgetary resources and tests the hypothesis about the impact of federal expenditures on regional per capita consumption. The following negative effects and trends were identified. Regions receive significantly less federal funds than the federal budget; the number of constituent entities with federal budget surplus increased. The regional inequality in terms of the federal budget execution indicators is growing: the gap between the maximum and minimum values of federal budget revenues per capita by region increased from 62 to 74 times; the gap between per capita expenditures is about 6 times. The disincentive effect of redistribution is strengthening due to increased withdrawals of income generated in donor regions and reduced spending of federal resources in recipient regions. Federal budget expenditures amplify the inequality in regional per capita consumption. Maximum and minimum specific values of the total federal and regional budget expenditures in regions differ by more than 10 times. The identified effects lead to an increase in regional inequality in the Russian Federation. According to the research results, intergovernmental redistribution mechanisms should be improved taking into account direct federal budget expenditures in regions.","PeriodicalId":47897,"journal":{"name":"Cambridge Journal of Regions Economy and Society","volume":"111 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cambridge Journal of Regions Economy and Society","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2023-1-21","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Federal budget expenditures in regions are not reduced to intergovernmental fiscal transfers to the budgets of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation. A significant part of the federal budget is spent directly in regions to support the expenditure commitments of the Russian Federation. The study aims to describe inter-territorial redistribution of financial resources and assess the contribution of the federal budget to regional per capita consumption by analysing data on 76 Russian constituent entities for 2016-2019. The article ranks regions according to the indicators of the federal budget per capita, estimates the ratio of federal and regional budgetary resources and tests the hypothesis about the impact of federal expenditures on regional per capita consumption. The following negative effects and trends were identified. Regions receive significantly less federal funds than the federal budget; the number of constituent entities with federal budget surplus increased. The regional inequality in terms of the federal budget execution indicators is growing: the gap between the maximum and minimum values of federal budget revenues per capita by region increased from 62 to 74 times; the gap between per capita expenditures is about 6 times. The disincentive effect of redistribution is strengthening due to increased withdrawals of income generated in donor regions and reduced spending of federal resources in recipient regions. Federal budget expenditures amplify the inequality in regional per capita consumption. Maximum and minimum specific values of the total federal and regional budget expenditures in regions differ by more than 10 times. The identified effects lead to an increase in regional inequality in the Russian Federation. According to the research results, intergovernmental redistribution mechanisms should be improved taking into account direct federal budget expenditures in regions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
俄罗斯地区联邦预算执行中的地区不平等
各地区的联邦预算支出没有减少为向俄罗斯联邦各组成实体的预算提供政府间财政转移。联邦预算的很大一部分直接用于各地区,以支持俄罗斯联邦的支出承诺。该研究旨在通过分析2016-2019年76个俄罗斯组成实体的数据,描述财政资源的地区间再分配,并评估联邦预算对地区人均消费的贡献。本文根据联邦人均预算指标对地区进行排序,估算联邦和地区预算资源的比例,并检验联邦支出对地区人均消费影响的假设。确定了以下负面影响和趋势。地区收到的联邦资金明显少于联邦预算;联邦预算有盈余的组成单位增加。在联邦预算执行指标方面的地区不平等正在扩大:地区人均联邦预算收入最大值和最小值之间的差距从62倍增加到74倍;两国人均支出差距约为6倍。再分配的抑制作用正在加强,因为捐助地区产生的收入越来越多地被提取,而受援国地区的联邦资源支出减少。联邦预算支出扩大了地区人均消费的不平等。各地区联邦和地区预算支出总额的具体最大值和最小值相差10倍以上。已查明的影响导致俄罗斯联邦的区域不平等加剧。研究结果表明,政府间再分配机制应考虑到地区直接的联邦预算支出。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
40
期刊最新文献
The polarisation of Italian metropolitan areas, 2000–2018: structural change, technology and growth Rural areas as winners of COVID-19, digitalization and remote working? Empirical evidence from recent internal migration in Germany Firm interconnectedness and resilience: evidence from the Italian manufacturing Construction minerals as part of an urban circular economy? A multi-scalar study of the city of Oslo and its hinterland Localised waste reduction networks, global destruction networks and the circular economy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1