For or Against Equal Pay? A Study of Common Perceptions

F. Sandnes, Anders Örtenblad, Einar Duengen Bøhn
{"title":"For or Against Equal Pay? A Study of Common Perceptions","authors":"F. Sandnes, Anders Örtenblad, Einar Duengen Bøhn","doi":"10.1177/08863687231162812","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The topic of equal pay usually sparks debates with diverse opinions ranging from those supporting equal pay to those that oppose equal pay. This study attempted to gather empirical data on how individuals perceive equal pay. A questionnaire was designed that probed the respondents’ perceptions of equal pay along 13 dimensions. The respondents were recruited in Norway and grouping analysis was performed according to several demographic factors. The results show that political affiliation, gender, and work union membership were the strongest predictors of standpoint regarding equal pay. The strongest associations with equal pay were observed for unfairness, communism, low realism, and demotivation. Small gender differences were also observed. We argue that data about common perceptions of equal pay is necessary to make informed adjustments to how work is rewarded, and resources distributed. How individuals are to be compensated for the cost of education was the most frequent reservation.","PeriodicalId":79838,"journal":{"name":"Compensation and benefits review","volume":"3 1","pages":"87 - 110"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Compensation and benefits review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08863687231162812","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The topic of equal pay usually sparks debates with diverse opinions ranging from those supporting equal pay to those that oppose equal pay. This study attempted to gather empirical data on how individuals perceive equal pay. A questionnaire was designed that probed the respondents’ perceptions of equal pay along 13 dimensions. The respondents were recruited in Norway and grouping analysis was performed according to several demographic factors. The results show that political affiliation, gender, and work union membership were the strongest predictors of standpoint regarding equal pay. The strongest associations with equal pay were observed for unfairness, communism, low realism, and demotivation. Small gender differences were also observed. We argue that data about common perceptions of equal pay is necessary to make informed adjustments to how work is rewarded, and resources distributed. How individuals are to be compensated for the cost of education was the most frequent reservation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
支持还是反对同工同酬?共同认知的研究
同工同酬这个话题通常会引发各种各样的争论,从支持同工同酬的人到反对同工同酬的人都有。这项研究试图收集个人如何看待同工同酬的经验数据。设计了一份调查问卷,从13个方面探讨了受访者对同工同酬的看法。受访者在挪威招募,并根据几个人口因素进行分组分析。结果显示,政治派别、性别和工会成员资格是对同工同酬立场的最强预测因素。与同工同酬联系最密切的是不公平、共产主义、低现实主义和缺乏动力。性别差异也很小。我们认为,关于同工同酬的普遍看法的数据是必要的,以便对如何奖励工作和分配资源做出明智的调整。如何补偿个人的教育费用是最常见的保留意见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Exploring Pay Transparency and Communication: An Introduction to the First of Two Special Issues on the Topic of Pay Transparency The Impact of Linking Three Different Incentive Methods to Specific, Challenging Goals Variable Pay Transparency in Organizations: When are Organizations More Likely to Open Up About Pay? Pay Transparency and Pay Communication Access to Employer Benefits and Financial Insecurity Among Frontline Healthcare Workers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1