How Can It Be Made Right Again? A Review of Trust Repair Research

IF 0.7 Q4 MANAGEMENT Irish Journal of Management Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1177/01492063221089897
Kinshuk Sharma, F. Schoorman, Gary A. Ballinger
{"title":"How Can It Be Made Right Again? A Review of Trust Repair Research","authors":"Kinshuk Sharma, F. Schoorman, Gary A. Ballinger","doi":"10.1177/01492063221089897","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We review research on the topic of trust repair, which has proceeded over the past four decades using three different philosophical mechanisms that provide the bases through which trust is restored by multiple repair tactics. We base our definition of trust repair on the view that trust is “a psychological state comprising the intention to accept vulnerability based on the positive expectations of the intentions or behaviors of another.” We define trust repair as any increase in trust above the post-transgression level and complete repair as an increase in trust to the pre-transgression level. We provide an overview of the research designs incorporated in the trust-repair literature and make recommendations and cautions in measuring trust repair. We then summarize the emergence of the different mechanisms behind trust repair, namely, attributional, social equilibrium, and structural mechanisms, and review literature on the related verbal and behavioral repair tactics that can be employed after a transgression. We also provide a review on the process of trust repair, that is, the different stages that unfold to repair trust. We conclude by suggesting that future research should explore trust repair not only from an isolated tactics perspective but also from a broader pathway perspective. Finally, as trust repair occurs over time, future research should also explore the role of differing perceptions of time in the trust-repair process.","PeriodicalId":52018,"journal":{"name":"Irish Journal of Management","volume":"2 1","pages":"363 - 399"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Irish Journal of Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063221089897","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

We review research on the topic of trust repair, which has proceeded over the past four decades using three different philosophical mechanisms that provide the bases through which trust is restored by multiple repair tactics. We base our definition of trust repair on the view that trust is “a psychological state comprising the intention to accept vulnerability based on the positive expectations of the intentions or behaviors of another.” We define trust repair as any increase in trust above the post-transgression level and complete repair as an increase in trust to the pre-transgression level. We provide an overview of the research designs incorporated in the trust-repair literature and make recommendations and cautions in measuring trust repair. We then summarize the emergence of the different mechanisms behind trust repair, namely, attributional, social equilibrium, and structural mechanisms, and review literature on the related verbal and behavioral repair tactics that can be employed after a transgression. We also provide a review on the process of trust repair, that is, the different stages that unfold to repair trust. We conclude by suggesting that future research should explore trust repair not only from an isolated tactics perspective but also from a broader pathway perspective. Finally, as trust repair occurs over time, future research should also explore the role of differing perceptions of time in the trust-repair process.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
怎样才能使它再次正确?信任修复研究述评
我们回顾了过去四十年来关于信任修复主题的研究,这些研究使用了三种不同的哲学机制,这些机制为通过多种修复策略恢复信任提供了基础。我们对信任修复的定义是基于这样的观点:信任是“一种心理状态,包括基于对他人意图或行为的积极期望而接受脆弱性的意愿。”我们将信任修复定义为超过犯罪后水平的任何信任增加,并将完全修复定义为信任增加到犯罪前水平。我们概述了信任修复文献中的研究设计,并提出了测量信任修复的建议和注意事项。然后,我们总结了信任修复背后不同机制的出现,即归因机制、社会平衡机制和结构机制,并回顾了相关的语言和行为修复策略,这些策略可以在违约后使用。我们也提供了对信任修复过程的回顾,即不同阶段展开的修复信任。最后,我们建议未来的研究不仅要从孤立的策略角度来探索信任修复,而且要从更广阔的路径角度来探索信任修复。最后,由于信任修复会随着时间的推移而发生,未来的研究还应该探讨不同的时间观念在信任修复过程中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
20.00%
发文量
7
期刊最新文献
Mental health disclosure in the workplace – An interpretative phenomenological analysis of the employee experience Oh the Anxiety! The Anxiety of Supervisor Bottom-Line Mentality and Mitigating Effects of Ethical Leadership Give Peace a Chance? How Regulatory Foci Influence Organizational Conflict Events in Intractable Conflict Environments Geographic Distance and State's Grip: Information Asymmetry, State Inattention, and Firm Implementation of State Policy From Home to Corner Office: How Work–Life Programs Influence Women's Managerial Representation in Japan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1