Exercise therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis: A review

Joost Dekker , Peter H Mulder , Johannes W.J Bijlsma , Rob A.B Oostendorp
{"title":"Exercise therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis: A review","authors":"Joost Dekker ,&nbsp;Peter H Mulder ,&nbsp;Johannes W.J Bijlsma ,&nbsp;Rob A.B Oostendorp","doi":"10.1016/0146-6402(93)90017-V","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Exercise therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or osteoarthritis (OA) is controversial, because both improvement and deterioration of the patients' condition can be expected to occur. The literature was searched for studies on the outcome of exercise therapy in RA- and OA-patients. Twenty-four studies were identified, comprising nine controlled studies. In the present review, these studies are critically summarized. It was found that controlled studies have only reported improvements or non-significant results; deterioration of the patients' condition has not been reported. With regard to specific modalities of exercise therapy, it was found that aerobic exercise in RA-patients has been most thoroughly studied: improvements for specific categories of outcome (e.g., walking time and other sorts of observed disability) have been repeatedly reported, while for other categories of outcome (e.g., pain) non-significant results have been consistently reported. Several methodological deficiencies (concerning randomization, blinded evaluation and power) and assets (concerning compliance) in controlled studies are noted and evaluated. It is concluded that, despite several qualifications, the available evidence is in favor of exercise therapy in RA- and OA-patients. Neglected areas of research, including comparisons between subgroups of patients, are identified and suggestions for future research are given.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100041,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy","volume":"15 3","pages":"Pages 211-238"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0146-6402(93)90017-V","citationCount":"29","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/014664029390017V","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 29

Abstract

Exercise therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or osteoarthritis (OA) is controversial, because both improvement and deterioration of the patients' condition can be expected to occur. The literature was searched for studies on the outcome of exercise therapy in RA- and OA-patients. Twenty-four studies were identified, comprising nine controlled studies. In the present review, these studies are critically summarized. It was found that controlled studies have only reported improvements or non-significant results; deterioration of the patients' condition has not been reported. With regard to specific modalities of exercise therapy, it was found that aerobic exercise in RA-patients has been most thoroughly studied: improvements for specific categories of outcome (e.g., walking time and other sorts of observed disability) have been repeatedly reported, while for other categories of outcome (e.g., pain) non-significant results have been consistently reported. Several methodological deficiencies (concerning randomization, blinded evaluation and power) and assets (concerning compliance) in controlled studies are noted and evaluated. It is concluded that, despite several qualifications, the available evidence is in favor of exercise therapy in RA- and OA-patients. Neglected areas of research, including comparisons between subgroups of patients, are identified and suggestions for future research are given.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
类风湿性关节炎和骨关节炎患者的运动治疗:综述
类风湿性关节炎(RA)或骨关节炎(OA)患者的运动治疗存在争议,因为可以预期患者病情的改善和恶化。我们检索了有关RA-和oa -患者运动治疗结果的研究。共纳入24项研究,包括9项对照研究。在本综述中,对这些研究进行了批判性总结。研究发现,对照研究只报告了改善或无显著结果;患者病情恶化的情况尚未见报道。关于运动治疗的具体方式,研究发现,有氧运动对ra患者的研究最为彻底:对特定类别的结果(如步行时间和其他类型的观察到的残疾)的改善已被反复报道,而对其他类别的结果(如疼痛)的无显著结果一直被报道。在对照研究中,一些方法学上的缺陷(关于随机化、盲法评估和功效)和优点(关于依从性)被注意和评估。结论是,尽管存在一些限制条件,但现有证据支持运动治疗RA和oa患者。被忽视的研究领域,包括患者亚组之间的比较,被确定和建议,为未来的研究给出。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cancer, personality and stress: Prediction and prevention Adolescent family predictors of substance use during early adulthood: A theoretical model Fears in mental retardation: Part one—Types of fears reported by men and women with and without mental retardation UCS-inflation and acquired fear responses in human conditioning Behavioral treatment of obesity: thirty years and counting
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1