EVALUATION OF COMMERCIAL ELISA, INDIRECT IMMUNOFLUORESCENCE TEST AND qPCR FOR THE DIAGNOSIS OF LEISHMANIA INFANTUM IN ASYMPTOMATIC DOGS FROM BOUIRA, NORTHEAST ALGERIA

Q4 Veterinary Veterinaria Pub Date : 2021-03-29 DOI:10.51607/22331360.2021.70.1.15
Aicha Yasmine Bellatreche, H. Medkour, R. Blaga, D. Roux, K. Miroud, K. Ait-Oudhia
{"title":"EVALUATION OF COMMERCIAL ELISA, INDIRECT IMMUNOFLUORESCENCE TEST AND qPCR FOR THE DIAGNOSIS OF LEISHMANIA INFANTUM IN ASYMPTOMATIC DOGS FROM BOUIRA, NORTHEAST ALGERIA","authors":"Aicha Yasmine Bellatreche, H. Medkour, R. Blaga, D. Roux, K. Miroud, K. Ait-Oudhia","doi":"10.51607/22331360.2021.70.1.15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Serological and molecular tests are important tools to determine and control Canine visceral leishmaniasis (CanL). The absence of pathognomonic symptoms and asymptomatic dogs make clinical diagnosis difficult. This study aims to determine the best combination for the diagnosis of Leishmania infantum in asymptomatic dogs. Ninety-four blood samples were collected from dogs in the province of Bouira, in Algeria and assessed with IFAT, ELISA, and qPCR. The sensitivity and specificity for each technique were evaluated in comparison with the indirect fluorescent antibody test (IFAT), which is considered the bestsuited test to determine the presence of L. infantum. In addition, the agreement between these tests was assessed. The use of Cohen’s Kappa coefficient demonstrated a moderate agreement between IFAT and qPCR (k= 0.475), and fair between the IFAT and ELISA (k=0.297). The sensitivity of the molecular test was higher (55.56%) than that of the ELISA (33.33%). According to those results, it is better to combine two tests for the diagnosis of CanL, especially in asymptomatic dogs, which is generally not included in the CanL control program.","PeriodicalId":23552,"journal":{"name":"Veterinaria","volume":"15 1","pages":"15-25"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinaria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51607/22331360.2021.70.1.15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Veterinary","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Serological and molecular tests are important tools to determine and control Canine visceral leishmaniasis (CanL). The absence of pathognomonic symptoms and asymptomatic dogs make clinical diagnosis difficult. This study aims to determine the best combination for the diagnosis of Leishmania infantum in asymptomatic dogs. Ninety-four blood samples were collected from dogs in the province of Bouira, in Algeria and assessed with IFAT, ELISA, and qPCR. The sensitivity and specificity for each technique were evaluated in comparison with the indirect fluorescent antibody test (IFAT), which is considered the bestsuited test to determine the presence of L. infantum. In addition, the agreement between these tests was assessed. The use of Cohen’s Kappa coefficient demonstrated a moderate agreement between IFAT and qPCR (k= 0.475), and fair between the IFAT and ELISA (k=0.297). The sensitivity of the molecular test was higher (55.56%) than that of the ELISA (33.33%). According to those results, it is better to combine two tests for the diagnosis of CanL, especially in asymptomatic dogs, which is generally not included in the CanL control program.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
商用酶联免疫吸附试验、间接免疫荧光试验和qPCR在阿尔及利亚东北部布伊拉无症状犬中诊断幼年利什曼原虫的评价
血清学和分子检测是确定和控制犬内脏利什曼病(CanL)的重要手段。无典型症状和无症状的狗使临床诊断困难。本研究旨在确定诊断无症状犬幼年利什曼原虫的最佳组合。从阿尔及利亚布伊拉省的狗身上采集了94份血液样本,并用IFAT、ELISA和qPCR进行了评估。与间接荧光抗体试验(IFAT)比较,评估了每种技术的敏感性和特异性,IFAT被认为是确定婴儿乳杆菌存在的最合适的试验。此外,还评估了这些试验之间的一致性。Cohen’s Kappa系数的使用表明IFAT和qPCR之间的一致性中等(k= 0.475), IFAT和ELISA之间的一致性一般(k=0.297)。分子检测的灵敏度(55.56%)高于ELISA(33.33%)。根据这些结果,对于CanL的诊断,最好将两种测试结合起来,特别是对于无症状犬,一般不包括在CanL控制程序中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Veterinaria
Veterinaria 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: VETERINARIA is the official scientific journal of the Italian Companion Animal Veterinary Association (SCIVAC) and is published bimonthly by Edizioni Veterinarie (E.V.). Its aim is to promote the spread and development of new ideas and techniques in the field of clinical and veterinary practices, with the ultimate goal of improving and promoting the continuing education of veterinary practicioners. VETERINARIA publishes literature reviews, original articles, diagnostic corners and clinical cases on different topics related to medicine and surgery of the dog, cat and of other companion animals, as well as short communications from congresses.
期刊最新文献
Forensic meaning of Core temperature - An indicator for assessing the severity of heatstroke in an animal model Efficacy of autogenous formalin killed whole cells vaccine against Edwardsiellosis in striped catfish (Pangasionodon hypophthalmus) Quality properties and fatty acids composition of breast meat from Japanese quails with different varieties grown under warm climate Animalni otpad i rizik od zoonoza - Osvrt na područja Bosne i Hercegovine i regiona Geometric morphometry in veterinary anatomy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1