Automated landmark identification on cone-beam computed tomography: Accuracy and reliability.

IF 0.3 4区 历史学 0 ARCHAEOLOGY Britannia Pub Date : 2022-06-02 DOI:10.2319/122121-928.1
Ali Ghowsi, David Hatcher, Heeyeon Suh, David Wile, Wesley Castro, Jan Krueger, Joorok Park, Heesoo Oh
{"title":"Automated landmark identification on cone-beam computed tomography: Accuracy and reliability.","authors":"Ali Ghowsi, David Hatcher, Heeyeon Suh, David Wile, Wesley Castro, Jan Krueger, Joorok Park, Heesoo Oh","doi":"10.2319/122121-928.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the accuracy and reliability of a fully automated landmark identification (ALI) system as a tool for automatic landmark location compared with human judges.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 100 cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images were collected. After the calibration procedure, two human judges identified 53 landmarks in the x, y, and z coordinate planes on CBCTs using Checkpoint Software (Stratovan Corporation, Davis, Calif). The ground truth was created by averaging landmark coordinates identified by two human judges for each landmark. To evaluate the accuracy of ALI, the mean absolute error (mm) at the x, y, and z coordinates and mean error distance (mm) between the human landmark identification and the ALI were determined, and a successful detection rate was calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, the ALI system was as successful at landmarking as the human judges. The ALI's mean absolute error for all coordinates was 1.57 mm on average. Across all three coordinate planes, 94% of the landmarks had a mean absolute error of less than 3 mm. The mean error distance for all 53 landmarks was 3.19 ± 2.6 mm. When applied to 53 landmarks on 100 CBCTs, the ALI system showed a 75% success rate in detecting landmarks within a 4-mm error distance range.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, ALI showed clinically acceptable mean error distances except for a few landmarks. The ALI was more precise than humans when identifying landmarks on the same image at different times. This study demonstrates the promise of ALI in aiding orthodontists with landmark identifications on CBCTs.</p>","PeriodicalId":44906,"journal":{"name":"Britannia","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9374352/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Britannia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2319/122121-928.1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the accuracy and reliability of a fully automated landmark identification (ALI) system as a tool for automatic landmark location compared with human judges.

Materials and methods: A total of 100 cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images were collected. After the calibration procedure, two human judges identified 53 landmarks in the x, y, and z coordinate planes on CBCTs using Checkpoint Software (Stratovan Corporation, Davis, Calif). The ground truth was created by averaging landmark coordinates identified by two human judges for each landmark. To evaluate the accuracy of ALI, the mean absolute error (mm) at the x, y, and z coordinates and mean error distance (mm) between the human landmark identification and the ALI were determined, and a successful detection rate was calculated.

Results: Overall, the ALI system was as successful at landmarking as the human judges. The ALI's mean absolute error for all coordinates was 1.57 mm on average. Across all three coordinate planes, 94% of the landmarks had a mean absolute error of less than 3 mm. The mean error distance for all 53 landmarks was 3.19 ± 2.6 mm. When applied to 53 landmarks on 100 CBCTs, the ALI system showed a 75% success rate in detecting landmarks within a 4-mm error distance range.

Conclusions: Overall, ALI showed clinically acceptable mean error distances except for a few landmarks. The ALI was more precise than humans when identifying landmarks on the same image at different times. This study demonstrates the promise of ALI in aiding orthodontists with landmark identifications on CBCTs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
锥形束计算机断层扫描的自动地标识别:准确性和可靠性
目的与人工判断相比,评估全自动地标识别(ALI)系统作为自动地标定位工具的准确性和可靠性:共收集了 100 张锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)图像。校准程序完成后,两名人类法官使用 Checkpoint 软件(Stratovan Corporation,Davis,Calif)在 CBCT 的 x、y 和 z 坐标平面上识别了 53 个地标。地面实况是由两名人类评判员对每个地标的地标坐标进行平均后得出的。为了评估 ALI 的准确性,确定了 x、y 和 z 坐标的平均绝对误差(毫米)以及人类地标识别与 ALI 之间的平均误差距离(毫米),并计算了成功检测率:结果:总体而言,ALI 系统在地标识别方面的成功率与人类法官不相上下。在所有坐标中,ALI 的平均绝对误差为 1.57 毫米。在所有三个坐标平面上,94% 的地标平均绝对误差小于 3 毫米。所有 53 个地标的平均误差距离为 3.19 ± 2.6 毫米。当应用于 100 个 CBCT 上的 53 个地标时,ALI 系统在 4 毫米误差距离范围内检测地标的成功率为 75%:总体而言,除少数地标外,ALI 显示了临床上可接受的平均误差距离。在不同时间识别同一图像上的地标时,ALI 比人类更精确。这项研究表明,ALI 有助于正畸医生在 CBCT 上识别地标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Britannia
Britannia Multiple-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
50.00%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Information not localized
期刊最新文献
III. INSCRIPTIONS BRI volume 54 Cover and Back matter II. FINDS REPORTED UNDER THE PORTABLE ANTIQUITIES SCHEME ENGLAND 3. HADRIAN'S WALL I. SITES EXPLORED 1. WALES
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1