THE INFLUENCE OF THE FATHER'S GENETYPE ON THE PRODUCTIVITY OF COWS AND THE PROBABILITY OF THEIR MASTITIS UNDER DIFFERENT HOUSING

IF 1.9 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics Pub Date : 2023-07-03 DOI:10.31073/abg.65.02
O. Admin, N. Admina, N. P. Rus’ko
{"title":"THE INFLUENCE OF THE FATHER'S GENETYPE ON THE PRODUCTIVITY OF COWS AND THE PROBABILITY OF THEIR MASTITIS UNDER DIFFERENT HOUSING","authors":"O. Admin, N. Admina, N. P. Rus’ko","doi":"10.31073/abg.65.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. The purpose of the study was to determine the influence of genetic factors on the productivity of cows and the probability of their disease with mastitis under different housing technologies. \nMaterials and methods of research. The work was carried out according to the data of two breeding plants for the breeding of the Ukrainian black and white dairy breed with free and stall housing. The data of more than 16,000 milk samples over the past six years were analyzed. Heritability of the average indicators of the quantity and quality of milk of cows according to the data of control milkings, yield for 305 days of lactation and the number of cases of diagnosis of mastitis using correlation analysis. Variability of milk quality of cows was monitored depending on the technology of housing. The research determined the influence of breeding bulls and their line on milk yield and milk quality indicators. To determine the influence of these factors, dispersion analysis was used. Processing of the obtained data was carried out according to basic statistical techniques using computer programs. \nResearch results. According to the research results, it was established that the variability of daily milk yield during free housing was higher by 6.1%, fat content by 7% compared to stall housing, and protein content, the number of somatic cells and their evaluation was lower. The strength of the influence of housing on the parameters of daily milk yield was: on the daily yield – 1.8%, on the fat content – 22.8%, on the protein content – 0.8%, on the number of somatic cells – 1.6%, on their evaluation – 4.1%, on the reliability of cows for 305 days of lactation – 4.1%, on milk fat output – 13.6%, on milk protein output – 6.3%, on the frequency of mastitis diagnosis – 4.5%. The coefficients of heritability of daily milk yield under stall housing were 2.2 times higher, fat content – 3.5 times, protein content – 1.8 times, number of somatic cells – 2.7 times, estimates of the number of somatic cells – 2 times, milk yield for 305 days of lactation – 2.4 times, the amount of milk protein – 1.6 times, and the number of cases of mastitis diagnosis – 1.7 times. The influence of bulls on indicators of the quantity and quality of cow milk was significantly higher than on daily milk yield. The strength of the influence of this factor on indicators of daily milk yield during free housing was: the milk yield – 5.5%, the fat content – 2.5%, the protein content – 2.7%, the number of somatic cells – 2.5%, the estimation of the number of somatic cells – 2.8%, and for stall housing – 4.3%, 6.7%, 6.7%, 2.9%, 7.3%, respectively. The strength of the influence on productivity indicators per lactation was as follows: for free housing on milk yield – 13.4%, on the amount of milk fat – 20.1%, on the amount of milk protein – 13.5% and on the number of cases of mastitis diagnosis – 12.7%, and for stall housing 19.1%, 13.6%, 18.0% and 35.2%, respectively (Р < 0.001). The influence of the factor \"bull\" was higher than the \"bull line\" factor on indicators of physical and chemical properties of milk and the frequency of cases diagnosis of mastitis in their daughters. \nConclusions. The housing technology has a significant impact on the productive indicators of dairy cows, their variability and heredity. For free housing of cows, the genetic conditioning of indicators of productivity and milk quality of cows, the probability of their mastitis disease was lower in comparison with stall housing.","PeriodicalId":54885,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics","volume":"65 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31073/abg.65.02","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. The purpose of the study was to determine the influence of genetic factors on the productivity of cows and the probability of their disease with mastitis under different housing technologies. Materials and methods of research. The work was carried out according to the data of two breeding plants for the breeding of the Ukrainian black and white dairy breed with free and stall housing. The data of more than 16,000 milk samples over the past six years were analyzed. Heritability of the average indicators of the quantity and quality of milk of cows according to the data of control milkings, yield for 305 days of lactation and the number of cases of diagnosis of mastitis using correlation analysis. Variability of milk quality of cows was monitored depending on the technology of housing. The research determined the influence of breeding bulls and their line on milk yield and milk quality indicators. To determine the influence of these factors, dispersion analysis was used. Processing of the obtained data was carried out according to basic statistical techniques using computer programs. Research results. According to the research results, it was established that the variability of daily milk yield during free housing was higher by 6.1%, fat content by 7% compared to stall housing, and protein content, the number of somatic cells and their evaluation was lower. The strength of the influence of housing on the parameters of daily milk yield was: on the daily yield – 1.8%, on the fat content – 22.8%, on the protein content – 0.8%, on the number of somatic cells – 1.6%, on their evaluation – 4.1%, on the reliability of cows for 305 days of lactation – 4.1%, on milk fat output – 13.6%, on milk protein output – 6.3%, on the frequency of mastitis diagnosis – 4.5%. The coefficients of heritability of daily milk yield under stall housing were 2.2 times higher, fat content – 3.5 times, protein content – 1.8 times, number of somatic cells – 2.7 times, estimates of the number of somatic cells – 2 times, milk yield for 305 days of lactation – 2.4 times, the amount of milk protein – 1.6 times, and the number of cases of mastitis diagnosis – 1.7 times. The influence of bulls on indicators of the quantity and quality of cow milk was significantly higher than on daily milk yield. The strength of the influence of this factor on indicators of daily milk yield during free housing was: the milk yield – 5.5%, the fat content – 2.5%, the protein content – 2.7%, the number of somatic cells – 2.5%, the estimation of the number of somatic cells – 2.8%, and for stall housing – 4.3%, 6.7%, 6.7%, 2.9%, 7.3%, respectively. The strength of the influence on productivity indicators per lactation was as follows: for free housing on milk yield – 13.4%, on the amount of milk fat – 20.1%, on the amount of milk protein – 13.5% and on the number of cases of mastitis diagnosis – 12.7%, and for stall housing 19.1%, 13.6%, 18.0% and 35.2%, respectively (Р < 0.001). The influence of the factor "bull" was higher than the "bull line" factor on indicators of physical and chemical properties of milk and the frequency of cases diagnosis of mastitis in their daughters. Conclusions. The housing technology has a significant impact on the productive indicators of dairy cows, their variability and heredity. For free housing of cows, the genetic conditioning of indicators of productivity and milk quality of cows, the probability of their mastitis disease was lower in comparison with stall housing.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同饲养条件下,父亲基因型对奶牛生产能力及乳腺炎发生概率的影响
介绍。该研究的目的是确定遗传因素对奶牛生产能力的影响,以及不同饲养技术下奶牛患乳腺炎的概率。研究材料和方法。这项工作是根据两家乌克兰黑白奶牛养殖场的数据进行的,这些养殖场采用自由饲养和圈舍饲养。研究人员分析了过去六年里超过1.6万份牛奶样本的数据。利用相关分析对对照挤奶、305 d产奶量和乳腺炎诊断例数等奶牛产奶量和质量平均指标的遗传力进行分析。根据不同的饲养技术,对奶牛的牛奶质量进行了监测。研究确定了种牛及其品系对产奶量和乳品质指标的影响。为了确定这些因素的影响,采用了分散分析。根据基本的统计技术,利用计算机程序对所得数据进行处理。研究的结果。研究结果表明,与笼养相比,散养期间的日产奶量变异性提高了6.1%,脂肪含量提高了7%,蛋白质含量、体细胞数及其评价降低了。住房对日产奶量参数的影响强度为:日产奶量1.8%,脂肪含量22.8%,蛋白质含量0.8%,体细胞数1.6%,评估4.1%,奶牛305天哺乳期可靠性4.1%,乳脂产量13.6%,乳蛋白产量6.3%,乳腺炎诊断频率4.5%。畜栏下日产奶量遗传系数为2.2倍,脂肪含量为3.5倍,蛋白质含量为1.8倍,体细胞数为2.7倍,体细胞数估计为2倍,泌乳305天产奶量为2.4倍,乳蛋白量为1.6倍,乳腺炎诊断数为1.7倍。公牛对奶牛产奶量和品质指标的影响显著高于对日产奶量的影响。该因子对放养期日产奶量指标的影响强度分别为:产奶量- 5.5%,脂肪含量- 2.5%,蛋白质含量- 2.7%,体细胞数- 2.5%,体细胞数估计值- 2.8%,圈养期- 4.3%,6.7%,6.7%,2.9%,7.3%。对每次泌乳生产率指标的影响程度如下:自由棚舍对产奶量的影响为13.4%,对乳脂量的影响为20.1%,对乳蛋白量的影响为13.5%,对乳腺炎诊断病例数的影响为12.7%,而棚舍对产奶量的影响分别为19.1%、13.6%、18.0%和35.2% (Р < 0.001)。“牛”因子对乳汁理化指标及女儿乳腺炎诊断频次的影响高于“牛线”因子。结论。圈养技术对奶牛的生产指标、变异性和遗传性有显著影响。在奶牛自由圈养条件下,奶牛生产能力和牛奶品质指标的遗传条件,奶牛患乳腺炎的概率比圈养奶牛低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics
Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.80%
发文量
58
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics publishes original articles by international scientists on genomic selection, and any other topic related to breeding programmes, selection, quantitative genetic, genomics, diversity and evolution of domestic animals. Researchers, teachers, and the animal breeding industry will find the reports of interest. Book reviews appear in many issues.
期刊最新文献
Genomic Diversity of U.S. Katahdin Hair Sheep. The Effect of Preselection on the Level of Bias and Accuracy in a Broiler Breeder Population, a Simulation Study. Genomic Prediction Using Imputed Whole-Genome Sequence Data in Australian Angus Cattle. Genetic Characterisation of Feeding Patterns in Lactating Holstein Cows and Their Association With Feed Efficiency Traits. Methods of Calculating Prediction Error Variance and Prediction Accuracy for Restricted Best Linear Unbiased Prediction of Breeding Values.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1