Fish of the Future: Genetically Engineered Salmon and Settler Colonial Science

Lindsey Schneider
{"title":"Fish of the Future: Genetically Engineered Salmon and Settler Colonial Science","authors":"Lindsey Schneider","doi":"10.1353/aiq.2022.0013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This article takes up the recent controversy over genetically engineered (GE) salmon and the FDA's approval of these fast-growing \"frankenfish\" for human consumption. While many believe that GE aquaculture plays a necessary role in the future of food security (especially in a world threatened by increasing climate instability), Indigenous communities throughout the world have raised concerns about the impacts of GE technology. At the heart of the issue is a clash between settler scientific values (including risk-based assessment, colonial right of discovery, and intellectual property) and Indigenous epistemologies, which take a more comprehensive approach to the complex relationships between the environment and those inhabiting it. Weaving together issues of ecology, climate change, and tribal sovereignty, this paper historicizes the GE salmon struggle within global processes of colonialism and resource extraction, and troubles the arguments GE fish are \"unnatural.\" Such designations rely on particular ideas about nature, property, and technology that reinforce settler scientific values. I argue that rejections of AquAdvantage salmon rooted in Indigenous epistemologies enable a more sophisticated critique of settler science, and are thus able to open new lines of inquiry into what our relationship with nature can and should look like in a settler colonial context.","PeriodicalId":22216,"journal":{"name":"The American Indian Quarterly","volume":"96 1","pages":"225 - 259"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Indian Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/aiq.2022.0013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract:This article takes up the recent controversy over genetically engineered (GE) salmon and the FDA's approval of these fast-growing "frankenfish" for human consumption. While many believe that GE aquaculture plays a necessary role in the future of food security (especially in a world threatened by increasing climate instability), Indigenous communities throughout the world have raised concerns about the impacts of GE technology. At the heart of the issue is a clash between settler scientific values (including risk-based assessment, colonial right of discovery, and intellectual property) and Indigenous epistemologies, which take a more comprehensive approach to the complex relationships between the environment and those inhabiting it. Weaving together issues of ecology, climate change, and tribal sovereignty, this paper historicizes the GE salmon struggle within global processes of colonialism and resource extraction, and troubles the arguments GE fish are "unnatural." Such designations rely on particular ideas about nature, property, and technology that reinforce settler scientific values. I argue that rejections of AquAdvantage salmon rooted in Indigenous epistemologies enable a more sophisticated critique of settler science, and are thus able to open new lines of inquiry into what our relationship with nature can and should look like in a settler colonial context.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
未来的鱼:基因工程鲑鱼和移民殖民科学
摘要:本文讨论了最近关于转基因鲑鱼和FDA批准这种快速生长的“弗兰肯鱼”供人类食用的争议。虽然许多人认为转基因水产养殖在未来的粮食安全中发挥着必要的作用(特别是在一个受到日益增加的气候不稳定威胁的世界中),但世界各地的土著社区已经提出了对转基因技术影响的担忧。问题的核心是定居者的科学价值观(包括基于风险的评估、殖民地的发现权和知识产权)与土著认识论之间的冲突,土著认识论对环境与居民之间的复杂关系采取了更全面的方法。这篇论文将生态、气候变化和部落主权等问题交织在一起,将转基因鲑鱼在全球殖民主义和资源开采过程中的斗争历史化,并质疑转基因鱼是“非自然的”。这种命名依赖于关于自然、财产和技术的特定观念,这些观念强化了定居者的科学价值观。我认为,基于土著认识论的对AquAdvantage鲑鱼的拒绝,使我们能够对定居者科学进行更复杂的批评,从而能够开辟新的研究路线,探讨在定居者殖民背景下,我们与自然的关系可以和应该是什么样子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Doodem and Council Fire: Anishinaabe Governance through Alliance by Heidi Bohaker (review) The Enduring Flame: Stress, Epigenetics, and the California Indian 1769–2000 Strawtown Koteewi: Indiana, NAGPRA, and the Culture of Noncompliance Choctaw Confederates: The American Civil War in Indian Country by Fay A. Yarbrough (review) Native American Rhetoric ed. by Lawrence W. Gross (review)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1