Quantification and comparison of ecosystem services of grasslands versus another fodder crop (maize) based on mineral nitrogen content in the 60–90 cm soil layer

H. Lipińska, I. Woźniak-Kostecka, A. Kocira, Wojciech Lipiński, Stanisław Franczak, A. Bochniak
{"title":"Quantification and comparison of ecosystem services of grasslands versus another fodder crop (maize) based on mineral nitrogen content in the 60–90 cm soil layer","authors":"H. Lipińska, I. Woźniak-Kostecka, A. Kocira, Wojciech Lipiński, Stanisław Franczak, A. Bochniak","doi":"10.24326/as.2021.4.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Grasslands provide many ecosystem services. Apart from being a source of fodder for animals, grasslands regulate water and soil quality by reducing nitrogen emissions to the environment. The aim of the study was to determine the biophysical and monetary value of ecosystem services of grassland based on the “mineral nitrogen content in the soil layer 60–90 cm” indicator depending on the method of use and the type of soil, against the cultivation of maize for green fodder. The study area encompassed three provinces, different in terms of soil use, livestock population and intensity of grassland use. The investigation indicated that the value of ecosystem services provided by grasslands varied spatially and depended on the type of use and type of soil. In mineral soils, the lowest levels of this index were recorded from sites used for pasturing, while the highest levels were found under maize crops. In organic soils (without maize crops), the smallest losses of Nmin were observed in meadows while the highest losses were in pastures. Nmin losses in organic soils were higher than in mineral soils. The losses observed were highest in Opolskie Province, followed by Podlaskie Province, with the lowest losses in Lubelskie Province.","PeriodicalId":100343,"journal":{"name":"Crop Science, Soil Science, Agronomy News","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crop Science, Soil Science, Agronomy News","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24326/as.2021.4.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Grasslands provide many ecosystem services. Apart from being a source of fodder for animals, grasslands regulate water and soil quality by reducing nitrogen emissions to the environment. The aim of the study was to determine the biophysical and monetary value of ecosystem services of grassland based on the “mineral nitrogen content in the soil layer 60–90 cm” indicator depending on the method of use and the type of soil, against the cultivation of maize for green fodder. The study area encompassed three provinces, different in terms of soil use, livestock population and intensity of grassland use. The investigation indicated that the value of ecosystem services provided by grasslands varied spatially and depended on the type of use and type of soil. In mineral soils, the lowest levels of this index were recorded from sites used for pasturing, while the highest levels were found under maize crops. In organic soils (without maize crops), the smallest losses of Nmin were observed in meadows while the highest losses were in pastures. Nmin losses in organic soils were higher than in mineral soils. The losses observed were highest in Opolskie Province, followed by Podlaskie Province, with the lowest losses in Lubelskie Province.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于60-90 cm土层矿质氮含量的草地与另一种饲料作物(玉米)生态系统服务功能量化与比较
草原提供许多生态系统服务。除了作为动物饲料的来源,草原还通过减少对环境的氮排放来调节水和土壤质量。本研究的目的是基于“60-90 cm土层矿质氮含量”指标,根据使用方法和土壤类型,确定草地生态系统服务的生物物理和货币价值,以种植玉米作为绿饲料。研究区包括3个省份,土壤利用、牲畜数量和草地利用强度各不相同。调查结果表明,草原生态系统服务价值存在空间差异,且受利用类型和土壤类型的影响。在矿质土壤中,该指数的最低水平来自牧场,而最高水平来自玉米作物。在有机土壤(不种植玉米)中,草甸的Nmin损失最小,而牧场的Nmin损失最大。有机土壤的Nmin损失量高于矿质土壤。所观察到的损失在奥波尔斯基省最高,其次是波德拉斯基省,在卢别尔斯基省损失最低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Ocena plonowania malin odmian powtarzających owocowanie w zależności od zagęszczenia pędów w rzędach w warunkach Padołu Zamojskiego Zmiany składu roślinności łąkowej i leśnej w wyniku ekstensywnego wypasu koników polskich Changes in the content of D-chiro-inositol and its α-D-galactosyl derivatives during vegetation and desiccation of common buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench) Ocena innowacyjnych właściwości nawozów dolistnych z dodatkiem żelującym oraz ich oddziaływania na biomasę i plonowanie wybranych roślin uprawnych Ocena efektów produkcyjnych uprawy soi [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] w zależności od sposobu przygotowania roli do siewu
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1