Pain Psychology: A Global Needs Assessment and National Call to Action.

IF 0.7 2区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY PHILOSOPHY Pub Date : 2016-02-01 Epub Date: 2016-01-23 DOI:10.1093/pm/pnv095
Beth D Darnall, Judith Scheman, Sara Davin, John W Burns, Jennifer L Murphy, Anna C Wilson, Robert D Kerns, Sean C Mackey
{"title":"Pain Psychology: A Global Needs Assessment and National Call to Action.","authors":"Beth D Darnall, Judith Scheman, Sara Davin, John W Burns, Jennifer L Murphy, Anna C Wilson, Robert D Kerns, Sean C Mackey","doi":"10.1093/pm/pnv095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The Institute of Medicine and the draft National Pain Strategy recently called for better training for health care clinicians. This was the first high-level needs assessment for pain psychology services and resources in the United States.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective, observational, cross-sectional.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Brief surveys were administered online to six stakeholder groups (psychologists/therapists, individuals with chronic pain, pain physicians, primary care physicians/physician assistants, nurse practitioners, and the directors of graduate and postgraduate psychology training programs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>1,991 responses were received. Results revealed low confidence and low perceived competency to address physical pain among psychologists/therapists, and high levels of interest and need for pain education. We found broad support for pain psychology across stakeholder groups, and global support for a national initiative to increase pain training and competency in U.S. therapists. Among directors of graduate and postgraduate psychology training programs, we found unanimous interest for a no-cost pain psychology curriculum that could be integrated into existing programs. Primary barriers to pain psychology include lack of a system to identify qualified therapists, paucity of therapists with pain training, limited awareness of the psychological treatment modality, and poor insurance coverage.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This report calls for transformation within psychology predoctoral and postdoctoral education and training and psychology continuing education to include and emphasize pain and pain management. A system for certification is needed to facilitate quality control and appropriate reimbursement. There is a need for systems to facilitate identification and access to practicing psychologists and therapists skilled in the treatment of pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":54197,"journal":{"name":"PHILOSOPHY","volume":"4 1","pages":"250-63"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2016-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4758272/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PHILOSOPHY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnv095","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2016/1/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The Institute of Medicine and the draft National Pain Strategy recently called for better training for health care clinicians. This was the first high-level needs assessment for pain psychology services and resources in the United States.

Design: Prospective, observational, cross-sectional.

Methods: Brief surveys were administered online to six stakeholder groups (psychologists/therapists, individuals with chronic pain, pain physicians, primary care physicians/physician assistants, nurse practitioners, and the directors of graduate and postgraduate psychology training programs).

Results: 1,991 responses were received. Results revealed low confidence and low perceived competency to address physical pain among psychologists/therapists, and high levels of interest and need for pain education. We found broad support for pain psychology across stakeholder groups, and global support for a national initiative to increase pain training and competency in U.S. therapists. Among directors of graduate and postgraduate psychology training programs, we found unanimous interest for a no-cost pain psychology curriculum that could be integrated into existing programs. Primary barriers to pain psychology include lack of a system to identify qualified therapists, paucity of therapists with pain training, limited awareness of the psychological treatment modality, and poor insurance coverage.

Conclusions: This report calls for transformation within psychology predoctoral and postdoctoral education and training and psychology continuing education to include and emphasize pain and pain management. A system for certification is needed to facilitate quality control and appropriate reimbursement. There is a need for systems to facilitate identification and access to practicing psychologists and therapists skilled in the treatment of pain.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
疼痛心理学:全球需求评估和国家行动呼吁》。
目的:医学研究所和国家疼痛战略草案最近呼吁对医疗保健临床医生进行更好的培训。这是美国首次对疼痛心理学服务和资源进行高层次需求评估:设计:前瞻性、观察性、横断面:方法:对六个利益相关群体(心理学家/治疗师、慢性疼痛患者、疼痛科医生、初级保健医生/医生助理、执业护士以及心理学研究生培训项目的负责人)进行在线简短调查:共收到 1,991 份回复。结果显示,心理学家/治疗师对解决身体疼痛问题的信心不足,能力不强,而对疼痛教育的兴趣和需求却很高。我们发现各利益相关群体对疼痛心理学的广泛支持,以及对一项旨在提高美国治疗师疼痛培训和能力的全国性倡议的全球支持。在研究生和研究生心理学培训项目的负责人中,我们发现他们一致希望开设可纳入现有项目的无成本疼痛心理学课程。疼痛心理学的主要障碍包括:缺乏识别合格治疗师的系统、缺乏受过疼痛培训的治疗师、对心理治疗方式的认识有限以及保险覆盖率低:本报告呼吁对心理学博士前和博士后教育与培训以及心理学继续教育进行改革,以纳入并强调疼痛和疼痛管理。需要建立一个认证体系,以促进质量控制和适当的报销。有必要建立一个系统,以方便识别和获得熟练掌握疼痛治疗的执业心理学家和治疗师。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
PHILOSOPHY
PHILOSOPHY PHILOSOPHY-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: Philosophy is the journal of the Royal Institute of Philosophy, which was founded in 1925 to build bridges between specialist philosophers and a wider educated public. The journal continues to fulfil a dual role: it is one of the leading academic journals of philosophy, but it also serves the philosophical interests of specialists in other fields (law, language, literature and the arts, medicine, politics, religion, science, education, psychology, history) and those of the informed general reader. Contributors are required to avoid needless technicality of language and presentation. The institutional subscription includes two supplements.
期刊最新文献
Dark Futures: Toward a Philosophical Archaeology of Hope Mobility, Migration, and Mobile Migration Feeling Responsible: On Regret for Others’ Harms Being Open-Minded about Open-Mindedness P.F. Strawson on Punishment and the Hypothesis of Symbolic Retribution
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1