Curbing the Rising House Prices: The Effect of Demand and Supply Policies on House Prices from a Perspective of the Timing of Policy Implementation

Hoon-Tark Park
{"title":"Curbing the Rising House Prices: The Effect of Demand and Supply Policies on House Prices from a Perspective of the Timing of Policy Implementation","authors":"Hoon-Tark Park","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3872006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper estimates the effect of the governmental announcement of demand restrictions and supply of new homes on house prices and investigates how the timing of policy implementation affects the impact of these policies. Empirically, we show that demand restrictions paired with a moderate or moderately high level of new home supply lead to a decline in house prices, whereas implementing only either demand or supply policies could result in a further increase. A critical observation from our study is that a rapid rise in house prices often self-reinforces its upward momentum, which ultimately accelerates the rate of increase in price over time. Our event study model shows that governmental interventions in the housing market have a significant impact in breaking that trend. In particular, implementing demand and supply policies simultaneously created a greater downward pressure on house prices in areas with a higher level of speculative investments, suggesting effectiveness of using both types of policies in reducing speculation. As an excessive increase in house prices compared to income growth drives the income gap between homeowners and non-owners, our study results contribute to reducing income inequality by better informing policymakers of the effective policy tools from a perspective of the timing of policy implementation.","PeriodicalId":21047,"journal":{"name":"Real Estate eJournal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Real Estate eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3872006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper estimates the effect of the governmental announcement of demand restrictions and supply of new homes on house prices and investigates how the timing of policy implementation affects the impact of these policies. Empirically, we show that demand restrictions paired with a moderate or moderately high level of new home supply lead to a decline in house prices, whereas implementing only either demand or supply policies could result in a further increase. A critical observation from our study is that a rapid rise in house prices often self-reinforces its upward momentum, which ultimately accelerates the rate of increase in price over time. Our event study model shows that governmental interventions in the housing market have a significant impact in breaking that trend. In particular, implementing demand and supply policies simultaneously created a greater downward pressure on house prices in areas with a higher level of speculative investments, suggesting effectiveness of using both types of policies in reducing speculation. As an excessive increase in house prices compared to income growth drives the income gap between homeowners and non-owners, our study results contribute to reducing income inequality by better informing policymakers of the effective policy tools from a perspective of the timing of policy implementation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
抑制房价上涨:从政策实施时机的角度看供求政策对房价的影响
本文估计了政府宣布限制需求和供应新房对房价的影响,并研究了政策实施的时机如何影响这些政策的影响。根据经验,我们表明,需求限制与适度或适度高水平的新房供应相结合会导致房价下跌,而仅实施需求或供应政策可能导致房价进一步上涨。从我们的研究中得出的一个重要结论是,房价的快速上涨往往会自我强化其上升势头,最终随着时间的推移加速价格的上涨速度。我们的事件研究模型表明,政府对房地产市场的干预对打破这一趋势有重大影响。特别是,同时实施需求和供应政策,对投机投资水平较高的地区的房价造成了更大的下行压力,这表明两种政策在减少投机方面都是有效的。由于与收入增长相比,房价的过度增长导致了有房者和无房者之间的收入差距,我们的研究结果有助于从政策实施时机的角度更好地告知政策制定者有效的政策工具,从而减少收入不平等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Financial Cycles Across G7 Economies: A View from Wavelet Analysis Assessing Lithuanian housing market for bubble Household Income, Asset Location and Real Estate Value: Evidence from REITs Household Debt and Labour Supply Decomposing Industry Leverage in the U.S.: the REIT Debt Puzzle
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1