Memahami Desentralisasi Fungsional (Perbandingan Praktek di Belanda, Jepang, USA, dan Jerman)

Irfan Ridwan Maksum
{"title":"Memahami Desentralisasi Fungsional (Perbandingan Praktek di Belanda, Jepang, USA, dan Jerman)","authors":"Irfan Ridwan Maksum","doi":"10.17304/IJIL.VOL4.3.156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Functional decentralisation practices in developing countries are mixed with the so-called privatisation which is a part of economic desentalisation and/or delegatuon of administrative decentralisation. This concept research is important in order to understand the concet of decentralisation as a whole. This article tries to make comparison of functional decentralisation practices in four countries: the Netherlands, Japan, the United States, ang Germany.","PeriodicalId":36998,"journal":{"name":"Indonesian Journal of International and Comparative Law","volume":"42 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indonesian Journal of International and Comparative Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17304/IJIL.VOL4.3.156","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Functional decentralisation practices in developing countries are mixed with the so-called privatisation which is a part of economic desentalisation and/or delegatuon of administrative decentralisation. This concept research is important in order to understand the concet of decentralisation as a whole. This article tries to make comparison of functional decentralisation practices in four countries: the Netherlands, Japan, the United States, ang Germany.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
了解功能的分散(在荷兰、日本、美国和德国的实践比较)
发展中国家的职能下放做法与所谓的私有化混合在一起,后者是经济下放和/或行政下放的一部分。为了从整体上理解去中心化的概念,这个概念研究是很重要的。本文试图对荷兰、日本、美国和德国四个国家的职能下放实践进行比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Beyond the Northwest Forest Plan The Indonesian Government Participation in International Investment Law and Its Reform DIGITAL SERVICES TAX REGULATION AND WTO NON-DISCRIMINATION PRINCIPLE: IS THE DECK STACKED? The Role of the NYPE Inter-Club Agreement as a Modular Apportionment Mechanism for Cargo-Claims across Multiple Jurisdictions The Protection of Foreign Investments in Disputed Maritime Areas of The South China Sea
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1