The diagnostic delay and treatment outcome of Clostridium difficile infection in the patients who underwent rectal surgery

Jaram Lee, Seung-Seop Yeom, Soo-Young Lee, C. Kim, Hyeong-Rok Kim, Y. J. Kim
{"title":"The diagnostic delay and treatment outcome of Clostridium difficile infection in the patients who underwent rectal surgery","authors":"Jaram Lee, Seung-Seop Yeom, Soo-Young Lee, C. Kim, Hyeong-Rok Kim, Y. J. Kim","doi":"10.14216/KJCO.19007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The bowel frequency of patients who had undergone rectal resection might be difficult to distinguish from the diarrhea of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI). The change of bowel movement following rectal surgery has been a challenge for the diagnosis of CDI and scarce studies discussed this diagnostic difficulty. Methods: a total of 8,327 patients in a single colorectal was evaluated for CDI, and their medical records were ret rospectively reviewed. Bowel frequency and treatment outcomes were compared between the rectal resection group (RG) and colectomy group (CG). Diagnostic time was defined as the time interval between first diarrhea (more than three times a day) and pathologic confirmation date of CDI. Results: CDI incidence was 2.3% (17/752) vs. 0.41% (31/7,575) between RG and CG (P<0.001). RG had frequent bowel movements than CG (RG: 13.56±6.16/day vs. CG: 8.39±6.23/day; P=0.010), but the interval between the time of symptom and the time of CDI diagnosis was longer in the RG than in CG (RG: 1.38±3.34 days vs. CG: 0.39±1.16 days). A total of three mortalities has been occurred (RG: 2 vs. CG: 1), and the reasons were delayed diagnosis and omitted treatment. Conclusion: Patients experienced significant bowel frequency after rectal surgery than after colectomy, and the delayed diagnosis was associated with mortality. Active surveillance for CDI should be performed for the patients who underwent rectal surgery to prevent morbidity and mortality from delayed diagnosis of CDI, but sophisticated guideline also should be evaluated to reduce over-examinations.","PeriodicalId":74045,"journal":{"name":"Korean journal of clinical oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean journal of clinical oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14216/KJCO.19007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Purpose: The bowel frequency of patients who had undergone rectal resection might be difficult to distinguish from the diarrhea of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI). The change of bowel movement following rectal surgery has been a challenge for the diagnosis of CDI and scarce studies discussed this diagnostic difficulty. Methods: a total of 8,327 patients in a single colorectal was evaluated for CDI, and their medical records were ret rospectively reviewed. Bowel frequency and treatment outcomes were compared between the rectal resection group (RG) and colectomy group (CG). Diagnostic time was defined as the time interval between first diarrhea (more than three times a day) and pathologic confirmation date of CDI. Results: CDI incidence was 2.3% (17/752) vs. 0.41% (31/7,575) between RG and CG (P<0.001). RG had frequent bowel movements than CG (RG: 13.56±6.16/day vs. CG: 8.39±6.23/day; P=0.010), but the interval between the time of symptom and the time of CDI diagnosis was longer in the RG than in CG (RG: 1.38±3.34 days vs. CG: 0.39±1.16 days). A total of three mortalities has been occurred (RG: 2 vs. CG: 1), and the reasons were delayed diagnosis and omitted treatment. Conclusion: Patients experienced significant bowel frequency after rectal surgery than after colectomy, and the delayed diagnosis was associated with mortality. Active surveillance for CDI should be performed for the patients who underwent rectal surgery to prevent morbidity and mortality from delayed diagnosis of CDI, but sophisticated guideline also should be evaluated to reduce over-examinations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
直肠手术患者难辨梭菌感染的诊断延误及治疗结果
目的:直肠切除术患者的肠频率可能难以与艰难梭菌感染(CDI)腹泻区分。直肠手术后肠道运动的变化一直是CDI诊断的一个挑战,很少有研究讨论这一诊断困难。方法:对单个结直肠共8327例患者进行CDI评估,并对其病历进行回顾性分析。比较直肠切除术组(RG)和结肠切除术组(CG)的肠频率和治疗结果。诊断时间定义为首次腹泻(每日3次以上)与CDI病理确诊日期之间的时间间隔。结果:RG组和CG组CDI发生率分别为2.3%(17/752)和0.41%(31/ 7575),差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)。RG比CG排便次数多(RG: 13.56±6.16/d vs. CG: 8.39±6.23/d);P=0.010),但RG组症状出现时间与CDI诊断时间间隔较CG组长(RG: 1.38±3.34 d vs CG: 0.39±1.16 d)。共发生3例死亡(RG: 2 vs. CG: 1),原因是延误诊断和遗漏治疗。结论:直肠手术后患者排便频率明显高于结肠切除术后患者,延迟诊断与死亡率相关。对于接受直肠手术的患者,应积极监测CDI,以防止延迟诊断CDI的发病率和死亡率,但也应评估复杂的指南,以减少过度检查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Association of tumor budding and tumor infiltrating lymphocytes with clinicopathological parameters in gallbladder carcinoma. Clinical course of pancreas cancer diagnosed after spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy with borderline lesion: two case reports. Measurement of human peritoneal surface area using artificial intelligence software in abdominal computed tomography. Pancreatoduodenectomy with colon-last approach for advanced pancreatic head cancer. Prediction of the minimum amount of anti-adhesive agent required for entire intra-abdominal cavity using fluorescent dye.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1