Vehicle Routing with Stochastic Demands and Partial Reoptimization

Alexandre M. Florio, D. Feillet, M. Poggi, Thibaut Vidal
{"title":"Vehicle Routing with Stochastic Demands and Partial Reoptimization","authors":"Alexandre M. Florio, D. Feillet, M. Poggi, Thibaut Vidal","doi":"10.1287/trsc.2022.1129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We consider the vehicle routing problem with stochastic demands (VRPSD), a problem in which customer demands are known in distribution at the route planning stage and revealed during route execution upon arrival at each customer. A long-standing open question on the VRPSD concerns the benefits of allowing, during route execution, partial reordering of the planned customer visits. Given the practical importance of this question and the growing interest on the VRPSD under optimal restocking, we study the VRPSD under a recourse policy known as the switch policy. The switch policy is a canonical reoptimization policy that permits only pairs of successive customers to be reordered. We consider this policy jointly with optimal preventive restocking and introduce a branch-cut-and-price algorithm to compute optimal a priori routing plans in this context. At its core, this algorithm features pricing routines where value functions represent the expected cost-to-go along planned routes for all possible states and reordering decisions. To ensure pricing tractability, we adopt a strategy that combines elementary pricing with completion bounds of varying complexity, and solve the pricing problem without relying on dominance rules. Our numerical experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of the algorithm for solving instances with up to 50 customers. Notably, they also give us new insights into the value of reoptimization. The switch policy enables significant cost savings over optimal restocking when the planned routes come from an algorithm built on a deterministic approximation of the data, an important scenario given the difficulty of finding optimal VRPSD solutions. The benefits are smaller when comparing optimal a priori VRPSD solutions obtained for both recourse policies. As it appears, further cost savings may require joint reordering and reassignment of customer visits among vehicles when the context permits.","PeriodicalId":23247,"journal":{"name":"Transp. Sci.","volume":"34 1","pages":"1393-1408"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transp. Sci.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.2022.1129","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

We consider the vehicle routing problem with stochastic demands (VRPSD), a problem in which customer demands are known in distribution at the route planning stage and revealed during route execution upon arrival at each customer. A long-standing open question on the VRPSD concerns the benefits of allowing, during route execution, partial reordering of the planned customer visits. Given the practical importance of this question and the growing interest on the VRPSD under optimal restocking, we study the VRPSD under a recourse policy known as the switch policy. The switch policy is a canonical reoptimization policy that permits only pairs of successive customers to be reordered. We consider this policy jointly with optimal preventive restocking and introduce a branch-cut-and-price algorithm to compute optimal a priori routing plans in this context. At its core, this algorithm features pricing routines where value functions represent the expected cost-to-go along planned routes for all possible states and reordering decisions. To ensure pricing tractability, we adopt a strategy that combines elementary pricing with completion bounds of varying complexity, and solve the pricing problem without relying on dominance rules. Our numerical experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of the algorithm for solving instances with up to 50 customers. Notably, they also give us new insights into the value of reoptimization. The switch policy enables significant cost savings over optimal restocking when the planned routes come from an algorithm built on a deterministic approximation of the data, an important scenario given the difficulty of finding optimal VRPSD solutions. The benefits are smaller when comparing optimal a priori VRPSD solutions obtained for both recourse policies. As it appears, further cost savings may require joint reordering and reassignment of customer visits among vehicles when the context permits.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
随机需求车辆路径与部分再优化
考虑随机需求车辆路径问题,即在路径规划阶段,客户需求在分布上是已知的,而在到达每个客户时,在路径执行过程中,需求是已知的。关于VRPSD的一个长期悬而未决的问题是,在路线执行过程中,允许部分重新排序计划的客户访问的好处。考虑到这个问题的实际重要性,以及人们对最优库存下的VRPSD的日益关注,我们研究了一种称为切换策略的资源策略下的VRPSD。交换策略是一种规范的再优化策略,它只允许对连续的客户进行重新排序。我们将该策略与最优预防性补货结合起来考虑,并引入了一种分支降价算法来计算最优先验路由计划。在其核心,该算法的特点是定价例程,其中价值函数表示沿着所有可能状态和重新排序决策的计划路线的预期成本。为了保证定价的可追溯性,我们采用了一种将基本定价与不同复杂度的完成边界相结合的策略,在不依赖优势规则的情况下解决了定价问题。我们的数值实验证明了该算法在解决多达50个客户的实例时的有效性。值得注意的是,它们也让我们对重新优化的价值有了新的认识。当规划的路线来自基于确定性近似数据的算法时,交换策略可以显著节省最佳补充库存的成本,这是考虑到寻找最佳VRPSD解决方案的困难的一个重要场景。当比较两种追索权策略获得的最优先验VRPSD解决方案时,收益较小。看来,进一步的成本节约可能需要在环境允许的情况下对车辆之间的客户访问进行联合重新排序和重新分配。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effects of Air Quality on Housing Location: A Predictive Dynamic Continuum User-Optimal Approach Transportation in the Sharing Economy Scheduling Vehicles with Spatial Conflicts Differentiated Pricing of Shared Mobility Systems Considering Network Effects Using COVID-19 Data on Vaccine Shipments and Wastage to Inform Modeling and Decision-Making
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1