Application of a New H2S Scavenger with Improved Performance in The Field

A. Jenkins, Santosh Gopi, J. Hoshowski, Warinthon Lertpornsuksawat, Jennifer Jackson, Thomas Wilson
{"title":"Application of a New H2S Scavenger with Improved Performance in The Field","authors":"A. Jenkins, Santosh Gopi, J. Hoshowski, Warinthon Lertpornsuksawat, Jennifer Jackson, Thomas Wilson","doi":"10.2118/206057-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The presence of hydrogen sulfide (H2S) gas occurs naturally, or can be introduced via bacteria contamination, in oil and gas reservoirs worldwide. There are several options for the removal of H2S from produced oil and gas ranging from fixed assets that scrub H2S to chemical injection at the wellsite. The area of interest for many operators is in the continuous application of non-reversible chemical H2S scavengers as an easy, reliable and cost-effective solution. The majority of the non-reversible chemical H2S scavenger market is based on triazine technology derived from the reaction products of formaldehyde and amines. In recent past, there has been an active industry wide search to improve the overall performance of H2S scavengers. Major topics for improvement include: Increased H2S scavenging capacityReduction of nitrogen contamination of crude oilReduction of scale formationElimination of by-product depositionAddressing existing environmental, health and safety concernsMinimization of products/reaction by-products disposal\n Conversely, some of the biggest hurdles with new H2S scavengers are ensuring fast kinetic reaction rates, system compatibility, consumption rates, minimal precipitation of scavenger/by-products, scalable manufacturing and competitive economics. Many new products have been proposed by chemical manufactures but often are not able to deliver enough benefits to warrant a change from the industry standard triazine. One potential solution is to pull through a technology from a different industry that already has established production, in significant volumes, for use in oilfield applications. Ideally, the new product would offer better performance versus the incumbent, a reduction in nitrogen content and minimize solids formation and deposition. A product identified several years ago as a potential replacement was an oxazolidine derivative referred to as MBO (3,3’-methylenebis(5-methyloxazolidine)). However, MBO has had limited application in the field until recently. MBO offers some of the same benefits as triazine but outperforms the incumbent technology by increasing the consumption of H2S per mole of scavenger, reducing the nitrogen content in crude oil, reducing the by-product deposition potential. Moreover, MBO is already produced in large manufacturing quantities. In this paper we will discuss details about the chemistry and increased formaldehyde content, laboratory results related to performance, system compatibilities, decreased transportation cost and confirmation of field application on large scale that supports the usage of this alternative H2S scavenger to standard triazine.\n H2S scavengers are used to mitigate the risks presented by H2S. They react with H2S in the liquid phase to form non-hazardous, non-reactive species that are often water soluble and thus disposed with water. Monoethanolamine (MEA) triazine (hexahydro-1,3,5-tris(hydroxyethyl)-s-triazine) is the most widely used scavenger. It is less toxic than most aldehyde scavengers and reacts very quickly with H2S. MEA triazine reacts irreversibly with H2S to form dithiazine (5-hydroxyethylhexahydrodithiazine). One of the major concerns with MEA triazine is that there is a strong possibility of the by-product MEA reacting with excess H2S to form an ethanolammonium sulfide species that in turn reacts with the dithiazine to form a largely insoluble polymer, commonly referred to as amorphous dithiazine. An alternative triazine used in oil and gas production is monomethylamine (MMA) triazine (1,3,5-trimethyl hexahydro-s-triazine). MMA triazine has greater volatility than MEA triazine so is more suitable for dry gas applications. In the cases on MEA triazine and MMA triazine the ratio to amine:formaldehyde is 1:1.","PeriodicalId":10965,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Thu, September 23, 2021","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 3 Thu, September 23, 2021","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/206057-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The presence of hydrogen sulfide (H2S) gas occurs naturally, or can be introduced via bacteria contamination, in oil and gas reservoirs worldwide. There are several options for the removal of H2S from produced oil and gas ranging from fixed assets that scrub H2S to chemical injection at the wellsite. The area of interest for many operators is in the continuous application of non-reversible chemical H2S scavengers as an easy, reliable and cost-effective solution. The majority of the non-reversible chemical H2S scavenger market is based on triazine technology derived from the reaction products of formaldehyde and amines. In recent past, there has been an active industry wide search to improve the overall performance of H2S scavengers. Major topics for improvement include: Increased H2S scavenging capacityReduction of nitrogen contamination of crude oilReduction of scale formationElimination of by-product depositionAddressing existing environmental, health and safety concernsMinimization of products/reaction by-products disposal Conversely, some of the biggest hurdles with new H2S scavengers are ensuring fast kinetic reaction rates, system compatibility, consumption rates, minimal precipitation of scavenger/by-products, scalable manufacturing and competitive economics. Many new products have been proposed by chemical manufactures but often are not able to deliver enough benefits to warrant a change from the industry standard triazine. One potential solution is to pull through a technology from a different industry that already has established production, in significant volumes, for use in oilfield applications. Ideally, the new product would offer better performance versus the incumbent, a reduction in nitrogen content and minimize solids formation and deposition. A product identified several years ago as a potential replacement was an oxazolidine derivative referred to as MBO (3,3’-methylenebis(5-methyloxazolidine)). However, MBO has had limited application in the field until recently. MBO offers some of the same benefits as triazine but outperforms the incumbent technology by increasing the consumption of H2S per mole of scavenger, reducing the nitrogen content in crude oil, reducing the by-product deposition potential. Moreover, MBO is already produced in large manufacturing quantities. In this paper we will discuss details about the chemistry and increased formaldehyde content, laboratory results related to performance, system compatibilities, decreased transportation cost and confirmation of field application on large scale that supports the usage of this alternative H2S scavenger to standard triazine. H2S scavengers are used to mitigate the risks presented by H2S. They react with H2S in the liquid phase to form non-hazardous, non-reactive species that are often water soluble and thus disposed with water. Monoethanolamine (MEA) triazine (hexahydro-1,3,5-tris(hydroxyethyl)-s-triazine) is the most widely used scavenger. It is less toxic than most aldehyde scavengers and reacts very quickly with H2S. MEA triazine reacts irreversibly with H2S to form dithiazine (5-hydroxyethylhexahydrodithiazine). One of the major concerns with MEA triazine is that there is a strong possibility of the by-product MEA reacting with excess H2S to form an ethanolammonium sulfide species that in turn reacts with the dithiazine to form a largely insoluble polymer, commonly referred to as amorphous dithiazine. An alternative triazine used in oil and gas production is monomethylamine (MMA) triazine (1,3,5-trimethyl hexahydro-s-triazine). MMA triazine has greater volatility than MEA triazine so is more suitable for dry gas applications. In the cases on MEA triazine and MMA triazine the ratio to amine:formaldehyde is 1:1.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新型H2S清除剂在油田的应用
在世界各地的油气储层中,硫化氢(H2S)气体是自然存在的,也可以通过细菌污染引入。从产出的油气中去除H2S有几种方法,从固定资产中去除H2S到在井场注入化学物质。许多作业者感兴趣的领域是将不可逆化学H2S清除剂作为一种简单、可靠、经济的解决方案进行持续应用。大多数不可逆化学H2S清除剂市场是基于甲醛和胺的反应产物衍生的三嗪技术。近年来,业界一直在积极研究如何提高H2S清除剂的整体性能。需要改进的主要课题包括:提高H2S清除能力减少原油氮污染减少结垢消除副产物沉积解决现有的环境、健康和安全问题最大限度地减少产物/反应副产物的处置相反,新型H2S清除剂的一些最大障碍是确保快速的动力学反应速率、系统兼容性、消耗率、最小的清除剂/副产物沉淀。规模化生产和竞争性经济。化学品制造商提出了许多新产品,但往往不能提供足够的好处,以保证改变工业标准的三嗪。一种潜在的解决方案是,从不同的行业引进一种已经建立了大量生产的技术,用于油田应用。理想情况下,新产品将提供比现有产品更好的性能,减少氮含量,最大限度地减少固体形成和沉积。几年前确定的潜在替代品是一种恶唑烷衍生物,称为MBO(3,3 ' -亚甲基双(5-甲基氧恶唑烷))。然而,直到最近,MBO在该领域的应用还很有限。MBO具有与三嗪相同的优点,但其性能优于现有技术,因为它增加了每摩尔清除剂的H2S消耗,降低了原油中的氮含量,减少了副产物沉积的可能性。此外,MBO已经大批量生产。在本文中,我们将详细讨论化学成分和甲醛含量的增加、与性能相关的实验室结果、系统兼容性、运输成本的降低以及大规模现场应用的确认,这些都支持使用这种替代标准三嗪的H2S清除剂。H2S清除剂用于减轻H2S带来的风险。它们在液相中与H2S反应,形成无害的非活性物质,这些物质通常是水溶性的,因此可以用水处理。单乙醇胺(MEA)三嗪(六氢-1,3,5-三(羟乙基)-s-三嗪)是应用最广泛的清除剂。它比大多数醛清除剂毒性小,与H2S反应非常快。MEA三嗪与H2S不可逆反应生成二噻嗪(5-羟乙基六氢二噻嗪)。MEA三嗪的一个主要问题是,副产物MEA很有可能与过量的H2S反应形成乙醇硫化铵,而乙醇硫化铵又与二嗪反应形成一种基本上不溶的聚合物,通常被称为无定形二嗪。一种用于石油和天然气生产的替代三嗪是一甲基胺(MMA)三嗪(1,3,5-三甲基六氢-s-三嗪)。MMA三嗪比MEA三嗪具有更大的挥发性,因此更适合干气应用。在MEA三嗪和MMA三嗪的情况下,与胺:甲醛的比例为1:1。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Incorporation of Neutrally Buoyant Proppants in Horizontal Unconventional Wells to Increase Propped Fracture Area Results for Substantially Improved Well Productivity and Economics Simplified Solution for Managed Pressure Drilling - System that Drillers Can Operate The Case for Combining Well Intervention Solutions to Optimize Production and Reduce Risk Exposure Application of Digital Well Construction Planning Tool During Well Conceptualization Phase Downhole Heating Technology – New Solution for Paraffinic Wells
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1