Evaluation of Resistant Urinary Tract Infections by Gram-positive Bacteria in Medina, Saudi Arabia

S. Amin, N. Abdel-Aziz, W. El-Sayed, M. Mahmoud, E. Elsayed, Rehab El-Tahlawi
{"title":"Evaluation of Resistant Urinary Tract Infections by Gram-positive Bacteria in Medina, Saudi Arabia","authors":"S. Amin, N. Abdel-Aziz, W. El-Sayed, M. Mahmoud, E. Elsayed, Rehab El-Tahlawi","doi":"10.12691/AJMR-9-1-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Gram-positive uropathogens have become common, associated with serious underlying illnesses and increasingly resistant to available antibiotics. Objectives: The goal of this study was to investigate the incidence and risk factors of gram-positive cocci UTIs in hospitalized patients in Medina, KSA and their susceptibility patterns to widely used antimicrobial agents. Methods: During a 12-month study, 165 clinical isolates of gram-positive cocci were recovered from 1137 culture-positive urine specimens at a tertiary hospital. Antimicrobial susceptibility of gram-positive cocci isolates was tested with the disk diffusion and E test methods. Molecular typing of some VRE isolates was done to detect the predominant Van genotypes. Results: Out of 8600 reviewed cases, 1137 (13.2%) were culture positive, 165 cases (14.5%) were gram positive cocci. E.faecalis formed 53.3% (88/165) of isolated gram-positive cocci, followed by E faecium (17.6%), S.agalactiae (23.6%) and S. aureus (5.5%). Multidrug resistant positive cocci formed 9.7% of gram-positive isolates including VRE (8.5%) and MRSA (1.2%). 75% of E. faecalis and 50% of E. faecium isolates were sensitive to nitrofurantoin, all VRE strains were sensitive to linezolid. All S. aureus isolates were sensitive to cefazolin, nirtofurantoin, sulfamethoxazole and vancomycin. 75% of MRSA strains were sensitive to sulfamethoxazole and all were sensitive to vancomycin. All isolates of S. agalactiae were sensitive to cefazolin and nitrofurantoin, and all were resistant to Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. Van B genotype was detected. Conclusion: Vancomycin and nitrofurantoin seem to be effective drugs for treatment of gram positive UTIs. vanB genotype was detected.","PeriodicalId":7580,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Microbiological Research","volume":"101 1","pages":"14-24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Microbiological Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12691/AJMR-9-1-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Gram-positive uropathogens have become common, associated with serious underlying illnesses and increasingly resistant to available antibiotics. Objectives: The goal of this study was to investigate the incidence and risk factors of gram-positive cocci UTIs in hospitalized patients in Medina, KSA and their susceptibility patterns to widely used antimicrobial agents. Methods: During a 12-month study, 165 clinical isolates of gram-positive cocci were recovered from 1137 culture-positive urine specimens at a tertiary hospital. Antimicrobial susceptibility of gram-positive cocci isolates was tested with the disk diffusion and E test methods. Molecular typing of some VRE isolates was done to detect the predominant Van genotypes. Results: Out of 8600 reviewed cases, 1137 (13.2%) were culture positive, 165 cases (14.5%) were gram positive cocci. E.faecalis formed 53.3% (88/165) of isolated gram-positive cocci, followed by E faecium (17.6%), S.agalactiae (23.6%) and S. aureus (5.5%). Multidrug resistant positive cocci formed 9.7% of gram-positive isolates including VRE (8.5%) and MRSA (1.2%). 75% of E. faecalis and 50% of E. faecium isolates were sensitive to nitrofurantoin, all VRE strains were sensitive to linezolid. All S. aureus isolates were sensitive to cefazolin, nirtofurantoin, sulfamethoxazole and vancomycin. 75% of MRSA strains were sensitive to sulfamethoxazole and all were sensitive to vancomycin. All isolates of S. agalactiae were sensitive to cefazolin and nitrofurantoin, and all were resistant to Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. Van B genotype was detected. Conclusion: Vancomycin and nitrofurantoin seem to be effective drugs for treatment of gram positive UTIs. vanB genotype was detected.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
沙特阿拉伯麦地那地区革兰氏阳性菌耐药尿路感染的评价
背景:革兰氏阳性尿路病原体已经变得很常见,与严重的潜在疾病有关,并且对现有抗生素的耐药性越来越强。目的:调查沙特阿拉伯麦地那市住院患者革兰氏阳性球菌尿路感染的发生率、危险因素及其对常用抗菌药物的敏感性。方法:在12个月的研究中,从某三级医院1137份培养阳性尿液标本中分离出165株革兰氏阳性球菌。采用纸片扩散法和E试验法对革兰氏阳性球菌分离株进行药敏试验。对部分VRE分离株进行分子分型,检测Van基因型优势。结果:8600例病例中培养阳性1137例(13.2%),革兰氏阳性165例(14.5%)。革兰氏阳性球菌中粪肠球菌占53.3%(88/165),其次是粪肠球菌(17.6%)、无乳链球菌(23.6%)和金黄色葡萄球菌(5.5%)。多重耐药阳性球菌占革兰氏阳性分离株的9.7%,包括VRE(8.5%)和MRSA(1.2%)。75%的粪肠杆菌和50%的粪肠杆菌对呋喃妥英敏感,所有VRE菌株对利奈唑胺敏感。所有金黄色葡萄球菌对头孢唑林、呋喃妥英、磺胺甲恶唑和万古霉素均敏感。75%的MRSA菌株对磺胺甲恶唑敏感,对万古霉素均敏感。所有菌株对头孢唑啉和呋喃妥英均敏感,对甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑均耐药。检测到Van B基因型。结论:万古霉素和呋喃妥因是治疗革兰氏阳性尿路感染的有效药物。检测vanB基因型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Applications of Cyclodextrin-gluconotransferase in the Biosynthesis of Cyclodextrins: Characteristics, Sources and Production Development of Two Ointments from Corn (Zea mays L.) Silk and Rice (Oryza sativa) Hull: Their Phytochemical Compositions, Antibacterial Properties, and Sensory Profiles Diversity and Biological Activities of Mold Isolated from Bilanko and Ngamakala Peat Bog Soils (Republic of Congo) Insights into the Prevalence and Resistance Patterns of Candida Species among Diabetic Patients in Cameroon: Potential Paths for Alternative Treatments Microbiological Quality of Raw and Pasteurized Milk from the Korhogo Dairy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1