Genotype x Environment Interactions on Seed Yield of Inter-racial Common Bean Lines in Kenya

Jean M. Mondo, P. M. Kimani, R. Narla
{"title":"Genotype x Environment Interactions on Seed Yield of Inter-racial Common Bean Lines in Kenya","authors":"Jean M. Mondo, P. M. Kimani, R. Narla","doi":"10.12691/WJAR-7-3-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Determination of yield stability is critical in identifying new common bean cultivars with either specific or broad adaptation in target environments. This study aimed to assess genotype by environment (G x E) effects on agronomic performance of 78 F1.7 lines selected with molecular markers for multiple disease resistance from 16 inter-racial bean populations. Field trials were conducted in low-, medium- and high altitude conditions in Kenya. Data collected on seed yield were subjected to additive main-effects and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) model to separate additive variance from the G x E interaction and to determine the stability of genotypes across locations. Results showed that G x E effects were highly significant (P<0.001), implying that tested lines behaved differently across the three locations. Better yields were recorded from high altitude Tigoni site while the lowest were from low altitude Mwea site. Yield across sites ranged from 1,518 to 2,748; 1,324 to 3,860; 1,537 to 3,722 and 1,010 to 3,718 kg ha-1 for pinto, red mottled, red kidney and mixed color bean lines, respectively. Number of pods plant-1 was the most strongly correlated to seed yield and could be, therefore, used as an indirect selection criterion for seed yield. The environment was responsible for the largest part of yield variability (86.4%, 84.8%, 82.3% and 49.5% for pinto, red kidney, red mottled and mixed color bean lines, respectively). KMA13-22-21 and KMA13-29-21 were the most stable high yielding lines across locations. Higher yielding lines were the most unstable across sites. Two pinto, four red kidney, 15 red mottled, and two mixed color lines did better than their corresponding checks with yield advantages of 7.6, 14.3, 71.5, and 34.9%, respectively. These lines should, therefore, be selected for further testing and release.","PeriodicalId":23702,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Agricultural Research","volume":"106 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Agricultural Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12691/WJAR-7-3-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Determination of yield stability is critical in identifying new common bean cultivars with either specific or broad adaptation in target environments. This study aimed to assess genotype by environment (G x E) effects on agronomic performance of 78 F1.7 lines selected with molecular markers for multiple disease resistance from 16 inter-racial bean populations. Field trials were conducted in low-, medium- and high altitude conditions in Kenya. Data collected on seed yield were subjected to additive main-effects and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) model to separate additive variance from the G x E interaction and to determine the stability of genotypes across locations. Results showed that G x E effects were highly significant (P<0.001), implying that tested lines behaved differently across the three locations. Better yields were recorded from high altitude Tigoni site while the lowest were from low altitude Mwea site. Yield across sites ranged from 1,518 to 2,748; 1,324 to 3,860; 1,537 to 3,722 and 1,010 to 3,718 kg ha-1 for pinto, red mottled, red kidney and mixed color bean lines, respectively. Number of pods plant-1 was the most strongly correlated to seed yield and could be, therefore, used as an indirect selection criterion for seed yield. The environment was responsible for the largest part of yield variability (86.4%, 84.8%, 82.3% and 49.5% for pinto, red kidney, red mottled and mixed color bean lines, respectively). KMA13-22-21 and KMA13-29-21 were the most stable high yielding lines across locations. Higher yielding lines were the most unstable across sites. Two pinto, four red kidney, 15 red mottled, and two mixed color lines did better than their corresponding checks with yield advantages of 7.6, 14.3, 71.5, and 34.9%, respectively. These lines should, therefore, be selected for further testing and release.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基因型与环境互作对肯尼亚普通豆种系种子产量的影响
确定产量稳定性对于鉴定具有特定或广泛适应目标环境的普通豆新品种至关重要。本研究利用分子标记从16个不同种间大豆群体中选育78个F1.7系,通过环境(gx E)评价基因型对其农艺性能的影响。在肯尼亚的低、中、高海拔条件下进行了实地试验。种子产量数据采用加性主效应和乘法互作(AMMI)模型,以分离G x E互作的加性方差,并确定基因型在不同地点的稳定性。结果显示,gx E效应非常显著(P<0.001),这意味着测试品系在三个位置的表现不同。高海拔Tigoni站点的产量较高,而低海拔Mwea站点的产量最低。各站点的产量从1518到2748不等;1324 ~ 3860;斑豆系、红斑豆系、红肾豆系和杂色豆系的产量分别为1537 ~ 3722 kg / h和1010 ~ 3718 kg / h。植株-1的荚果数与种子产量的相关性最强,可作为种子产量的间接选择标准。环境对产量变异的贡献率最大,分别为86.4%、84.8%、82.3%和49.5%(斑豆系、红肾豆系、红斑纹豆系和杂色豆系)。KMA13-22-21和KMA13-29-21是各地点最稳定的高产品系。高产系在各位点最不稳定。2个平色系、4个红肾系、15个红斑纹系和2个杂色系的产量优势分别为7.6%、14.3%、71.5%和34.9%。因此,应该选择这些线路进行进一步的测试和发布。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effects of Rice-duck Cropping Mode on Soil Enzyme Activities Integrated Soil Fertility Management Practices for Coffee in Tanzania: A Review Soil Fertility Status of Kagera Region and the “Organic-by-Default” Coffee Paradigm: A Meta-Analysis of Existing Database Assessment of the Agronomic Performance of Seven Okra (<i>Abelmoschus esculentus</i> (L.), Moench) Cultivars in Southern Côte d’Ivoire Functional Properties, Proximate and Mineral Compositions of Seeds of Selected Cucurbit Species
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1