The Romanesque Abbey of St Peter at Gloucester

Pub Date : 2021-12-10 DOI:10.1080/00665983.2021.2015132
Cai Mason
{"title":"The Romanesque Abbey of St Peter at Gloucester","authors":"Cai Mason","doi":"10.1080/00665983.2021.2015132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Gloucester Cathedral is a remarkable building. Built as a Benedictine abbey between AD 1089 and the early twelfth century, it is one of England’s finest examples of Romanesque architecture, which retains most of its original layout, and although partially concealed, much of its original fabric. Heighway served as the cathedral’s archaeological consultant for almost 30 years, during which time numerous architectural surveys and small-scale archaeological excavations were undertaken in and around the cathedral. This book draws together the results of these disparate records, with the aims of producing a detailed reconstruction the Norman abbey’s original appearance, and to highlight just how much of its original fabric survives. The book is divided into seven chapters. The first four describe the surviving Romanesque fabric in different areas of the building. Subsequent chapters explore the use of painted colour decoration, traces of which survive in the choir; and detail the surviving Romanesque carvings. The penultimate chapter explores that wider context of the abbey and the relationships between its architecture and those of analogous churches, both locally and in the wider Norman cultural sphere. The book is heavily illustrated with colour and monochrome photographs of extant structural elements, and detailed line drawn elevations and plans of the reconstructed abbey. Where there is debate or ambiguity as to the form of certain elements (e.g. the form of western entrance and presence of Westwork towers, pp. 64–72, or the size and positions of the clerestory windows of the choir, pp. 22–23), the arguments for various interpretations are clearly presented. The book could have benefited from a full elevation of the east/west axis of the abbey in its entirety, however this omission is counterbalanced by the inclusion of R. Bryant’s perspective reconstruction (Fig. 128, p. 106), which provides an excellent overall impression of the abbey as it may have originally appeared. The book is accessible and clearly designed to appeal to a wide audience, however some of the architectural terminology can be quite technical, and a glossary of these terms would help the lay reader. These minor quibbles aside, Heighway and Bryant’s book succeeds admirably in its aims of creating the fullest possible reconstruction of this incredible building and encouraging an appreciation of the surviving remains. This book serves as a model for what can be achieved when hard-won, though often very inaccessible, architectural and archaeological surveys of the nation’s great churches are synthesized and analysed, though few who undertake this task will be as blessed with the wealth of surviving Romanesque fabric that presents itself at Gloucester Cathedral.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00665983.2021.2015132","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Gloucester Cathedral is a remarkable building. Built as a Benedictine abbey between AD 1089 and the early twelfth century, it is one of England’s finest examples of Romanesque architecture, which retains most of its original layout, and although partially concealed, much of its original fabric. Heighway served as the cathedral’s archaeological consultant for almost 30 years, during which time numerous architectural surveys and small-scale archaeological excavations were undertaken in and around the cathedral. This book draws together the results of these disparate records, with the aims of producing a detailed reconstruction the Norman abbey’s original appearance, and to highlight just how much of its original fabric survives. The book is divided into seven chapters. The first four describe the surviving Romanesque fabric in different areas of the building. Subsequent chapters explore the use of painted colour decoration, traces of which survive in the choir; and detail the surviving Romanesque carvings. The penultimate chapter explores that wider context of the abbey and the relationships between its architecture and those of analogous churches, both locally and in the wider Norman cultural sphere. The book is heavily illustrated with colour and monochrome photographs of extant structural elements, and detailed line drawn elevations and plans of the reconstructed abbey. Where there is debate or ambiguity as to the form of certain elements (e.g. the form of western entrance and presence of Westwork towers, pp. 64–72, or the size and positions of the clerestory windows of the choir, pp. 22–23), the arguments for various interpretations are clearly presented. The book could have benefited from a full elevation of the east/west axis of the abbey in its entirety, however this omission is counterbalanced by the inclusion of R. Bryant’s perspective reconstruction (Fig. 128, p. 106), which provides an excellent overall impression of the abbey as it may have originally appeared. The book is accessible and clearly designed to appeal to a wide audience, however some of the architectural terminology can be quite technical, and a glossary of these terms would help the lay reader. These minor quibbles aside, Heighway and Bryant’s book succeeds admirably in its aims of creating the fullest possible reconstruction of this incredible building and encouraging an appreciation of the surviving remains. This book serves as a model for what can be achieved when hard-won, though often very inaccessible, architectural and archaeological surveys of the nation’s great churches are synthesized and analysed, though few who undertake this task will be as blessed with the wealth of surviving Romanesque fabric that presents itself at Gloucester Cathedral.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
格洛斯特的罗马式圣彼得修道院
格洛斯特大教堂是一座非凡的建筑。它建于公元1089年至12世纪初,是一座本笃会修道院,是英国最好的罗马式建筑之一,保留了大部分原始布局,尽管部分隐藏,但大部分原始结构。highway担任大教堂的考古顾问近30年,在此期间,在大教堂内和周围进行了大量的建筑调查和小规模的考古发掘。这本书汇集了这些不同记录的结果,目的是对诺曼修道院的原貌进行详细的重建,并强调它的原始结构保留了多少。这本书分为七章。前四章描述了建筑不同区域幸存的罗马式结构。随后的章节探讨了彩绘装饰的使用,其痕迹在唱诗班中幸存下来;详细介绍了现存的罗马式雕刻。倒数第二章探讨了修道院更广泛的背景,以及它的建筑与那些类似的教堂之间的关系,无论是在当地还是在更广泛的诺曼文化领域。书中有大量现存结构元素的彩色和单色照片,以及重建修道院的详细立面和平面图。对于某些元素的形式存在争议或模棱两可的地方(例如,西面入口的形式和Westwork塔楼的存在,第64-72页,或唱诗班天窗的大小和位置,第22-23页),各种解释的论点都清晰地呈现出来。这本书本可以从修道院东/西轴线的完整立面中受益,然而,这一遗漏被R. Bryant的视角重建所抵消(图128,第106页),这提供了修道院最初出现时的绝佳整体印象。这本书通俗易懂,设计清晰,旨在吸引广大读者,然而,一些架构术语可能相当专业,这些术语的术语表将帮助外行读者。撇开这些小的吹毛求疵不谈,海威和布莱恩特的书在尽可能充分地重建这座令人难以置信的建筑和鼓励对幸存遗迹的欣赏方面取得了令人钦佩的成功。这本书可以作为一个范例,说明当对国家伟大教堂的建筑和考古调查来之不易,但往往很难获得时,可以取得什么成果,尽管很少有人承担这项任务,将像格洛斯特大教堂一样,拥有幸存下来的罗马式建筑的财富。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1