Engaging Patients and Caregivers in Research for Pediatric IBD: Top 10 Research Priorities.

A. Grant, M. Crane, A. Laupacis, A. Griffiths, D. Burnett, Amanda Hood, C. Kluthe, Muneet Maghera, Malcolm Mann, M. Mansi, Kate Murray, M. Trempe, A. Otley
{"title":"Engaging Patients and Caregivers in Research for Pediatric IBD: Top 10 Research Priorities.","authors":"A. Grant, M. Crane, A. Laupacis, A. Griffiths, D. Burnett, Amanda Hood, C. Kluthe, Muneet Maghera, Malcolm Mann, M. Mansi, Kate Murray, M. Trempe, A. Otley","doi":"10.1097/MPG.0000000000002396","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION\nIncluding individuals with lived experience in pediatric IBD is essential to establishing a research agenda that is mutually impactful to both those treating and those experiencing the disease.\n\n\nMETHODS\nUsing the James Lind Alliance approach to research priority setting, a 10-member steering committee comprised of current and former pediatric IBD patients, caregivers, and clinicians was formed. A national survey, disseminated across Canada, elicited uncertainties which were divided into unanswered and answered research questions. Subsequently a research prioritization survey was disseminated where respondents ranked their top 20 research uncertainties. A final prioritization meeting was held to agree upon the top 10 uncertainties.\n\n\nRESULTS\nFrom 1209 research questions submitted by 363 participants, the list was reduced to 105 indicative questions that were within scope and deemed unanswered in the literature. Via the national research prioritization survey, this list was further reduced. The top 10 uncertainties identified at the final research consensus meeting, with 21 participants from all stakeholder groups, included: \"What are the causes of IBD?\", \"Can IBD be prevented?\", \"What role does diet have in the management of pediatric IBD?\". Other questions concerned flare ups, biomarkers, optimal patient education, long-term effects of medication and early-diagnosis, role of psychological support, and optimal approach to diagnosis.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nThis research adds a unique perspective by deriving a list of pediatric IBD research uncertainties important by patients and caregivers, as well as clinicians.","PeriodicalId":16725,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology & Nutrition","volume":"46 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology & Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MPG.0000000000002396","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

INTRODUCTION Including individuals with lived experience in pediatric IBD is essential to establishing a research agenda that is mutually impactful to both those treating and those experiencing the disease. METHODS Using the James Lind Alliance approach to research priority setting, a 10-member steering committee comprised of current and former pediatric IBD patients, caregivers, and clinicians was formed. A national survey, disseminated across Canada, elicited uncertainties which were divided into unanswered and answered research questions. Subsequently a research prioritization survey was disseminated where respondents ranked their top 20 research uncertainties. A final prioritization meeting was held to agree upon the top 10 uncertainties. RESULTS From 1209 research questions submitted by 363 participants, the list was reduced to 105 indicative questions that were within scope and deemed unanswered in the literature. Via the national research prioritization survey, this list was further reduced. The top 10 uncertainties identified at the final research consensus meeting, with 21 participants from all stakeholder groups, included: "What are the causes of IBD?", "Can IBD be prevented?", "What role does diet have in the management of pediatric IBD?". Other questions concerned flare ups, biomarkers, optimal patient education, long-term effects of medication and early-diagnosis, role of psychological support, and optimal approach to diagnosis. CONCLUSION This research adds a unique perspective by deriving a list of pediatric IBD research uncertainties important by patients and caregivers, as well as clinicians.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
参与儿童IBD研究的患者和护理人员:十大研究重点。
包括有儿童IBD生活经验的个体对于建立一个对治疗者和患病者都有相互影响的研究议程至关重要。方法采用James Lind联盟的方法来确定研究重点,成立了一个由现在和以前的儿科IBD患者、护理人员和临床医生组成的10人指导委员会。一项全国性的调查,在加拿大各地传播,引发了不确定性,这些不确定性分为未回答和回答的研究问题。随后,一项研究优先级调查被传播,受访者对他们的前20个研究不确定性进行了排名。最后召开了优先排序会议,就十大不确定因素达成一致。结果从363名参与者提交的1209个研究问题中,列表被减少到105个指示性问题,这些问题在范围内,并且在文献中被认为没有答案。通过国家研究优先级调查,这一名单进一步减少。在最终的研究共识会议上,来自所有利益相关者群体的21名参与者确定了十大不确定因素,包括:“IBD的原因是什么?”,“IBD可以预防吗?”,“饮食在小儿IBD管理中的作用是什么?”其他问题涉及突发事件、生物标志物、最佳患者教育、药物治疗和早期诊断的长期影响、心理支持的作用以及最佳诊断方法。本研究通过得出一系列对患者、护理人员以及临床医生重要的儿科IBD研究不确定性,增加了一个独特的视角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Cutting Edge: a 17-Year-Old Female with Razor Blade Ingestion. Learning Curve Analyses for Achieving Satisfactory Procedural Completion Rates in Paediatric Oesophagogastroduodenoscopy. Trough Levels of Infliximab at W6 Are Predictive of Remission at W14 in Pediatric Crohn Disease. Community Socioeconomic Deprivation and Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Severity. European Society Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition Guidelines for Diagnosing Coeliac Disease 2019.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1