Pesticide Use and its Effects on Daily Functioning among Elderly Farmers

Sotiria Moza, G. Hadjigeorgiou, N. Scarmeas, E. Dardiotis, M. Yannakoulia, M. Kosmidis
{"title":"Pesticide Use and its Effects on Daily Functioning among Elderly Farmers","authors":"Sotiria Moza, G. Hadjigeorgiou, N. Scarmeas, E. Dardiotis, M. Yannakoulia, M. Kosmidis","doi":"10.37871/jbres1330","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Poor pesticide handling practices are recorded on a regular basis in Greece, where the average farmer is elderly. This raises concerns regarding their compliance with pesticide regulations and the associated health implications. Our purpose in undertaking the present study was to examine elderly farmers’ attitudes regarding pesticide handling and safety issues, as well as, the potential link between pesticide exposure and daily functioning capacity. Methods: Participants were 1443 elderly individuals, 276 of whom reported long-term, direct exposure to pesticides (spraying in gardens, open fields, and/or a greenhouse). Several aspects of pesticide handling were gleaned via a self-report questionnaire. Ability to perform everyday tasks was assessed with the Blessed Dementia Rating Scale. Results: On average, participants were not consistent with respect to safety practices. Half could not recall the specific brand names of the pesticides they used and 47.5% reported using chemical cocktails, often exceeding the maximum recommended frequency of applications per year. In many cases, they reported application of banned pesticides, such as DDT, and more than half reported applying pesticides without protective equipment. Analyses showed that exposure to pesticides was associated with impaired everyday functioning (OR = 1.16; 95%, CI = 1.04-1.28) and specifically, with an inability to interpret surroundings and recall recent events, a tendency to dwell on the past and changes in bladder-sphincter control. Conclusion: We found poor awareness and adherence to safety practices regarding pesticide use among elderly farmers, as well as an association between pesticide use and everyday functioning. Relevant health and environmental implications are discussed.","PeriodicalId":94067,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biomedical research & environmental sciences","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biomedical research & environmental sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37871/jbres1330","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Poor pesticide handling practices are recorded on a regular basis in Greece, where the average farmer is elderly. This raises concerns regarding their compliance with pesticide regulations and the associated health implications. Our purpose in undertaking the present study was to examine elderly farmers’ attitudes regarding pesticide handling and safety issues, as well as, the potential link between pesticide exposure and daily functioning capacity. Methods: Participants were 1443 elderly individuals, 276 of whom reported long-term, direct exposure to pesticides (spraying in gardens, open fields, and/or a greenhouse). Several aspects of pesticide handling were gleaned via a self-report questionnaire. Ability to perform everyday tasks was assessed with the Blessed Dementia Rating Scale. Results: On average, participants were not consistent with respect to safety practices. Half could not recall the specific brand names of the pesticides they used and 47.5% reported using chemical cocktails, often exceeding the maximum recommended frequency of applications per year. In many cases, they reported application of banned pesticides, such as DDT, and more than half reported applying pesticides without protective equipment. Analyses showed that exposure to pesticides was associated with impaired everyday functioning (OR = 1.16; 95%, CI = 1.04-1.28) and specifically, with an inability to interpret surroundings and recall recent events, a tendency to dwell on the past and changes in bladder-sphincter control. Conclusion: We found poor awareness and adherence to safety practices regarding pesticide use among elderly farmers, as well as an association between pesticide use and everyday functioning. Relevant health and environmental implications are discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
农药使用及其对老年农民日常功能的影响
背景:在希腊,不良的农药处理做法经常被记录下来,那里的农民一般都是老年人。这引起了人们对它们是否遵守农药条例以及相关的健康影响的关切。我们进行本研究的目的是调查老年农民对农药处理和安全问题的态度,以及农药暴露与日常功能能力之间的潜在联系。方法:参与者为1443名老年人,其中276人报告长期直接暴露于农药(在花园、露天田地和/或温室喷洒)。通过自我报告问卷收集了农药处理的几个方面。执行日常任务的能力用祝福痴呆评定量表进行评估。结果:平均而言,参与者在安全实践方面不一致。一半的人记不起他们使用的农药的具体品牌名称,47.5%的人报告使用化学混合物,经常超过每年使用的最大建议频率。在许多情况下,他们报告使用了滴滴涕等禁用农药,一半以上的人报告在没有防护设备的情况下使用农药。分析表明,接触农药与日常功能受损有关(OR = 1.16;95%, CI = 1.04-1.28),特别是,无法解释周围环境和回忆最近的事件,倾向于沉溺于过去和膀胱括约肌控制的变化。结论:我们发现老年农民对农药使用安全实践的认识和遵守程度较差,农药使用与日常功能之间存在关联。讨论了相关的健康和环境影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Breastfeeding among Hispanic and Black Women: Barriers and Support. Flood Prevention Raman Spectroscopic Detection of Silicone Leakage in Human Breast and Lymph Node Tissues Characterization and Selection by Optical Absorption and Emission Spectrophotometry of a Series of Red Dyes Capable of Destroying Far UV Rays by Absorption Improving Invasive Breast Cancer Care Using Machine Learning Technology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1