RESPONSIBILITIES OF STATES SPONSORING PERSONS AND ENTITIES WHO CONDUCT ACTIVITIES IN THE INTERNATIONAL SEABED AREA

Fatma Muthia Kinanti
{"title":"RESPONSIBILITIES OF STATES SPONSORING PERSONS AND ENTITIES WHO CONDUCT ACTIVITIES IN THE INTERNATIONAL SEABED AREA","authors":"Fatma Muthia Kinanti","doi":"10.17304/IJIL.VOL18.2.808","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The exploitation of seabed has been regulated in the international sea law regime, namely in UNCLOS 1982 and in its modification regulations, the 1994 Implementing Agreement. This regime regulates the sponsorship mechanism whereby companies wishing to carry out activities in the international seabed must cooperate with states participating in UNCLOS 1982. In addition to providing obligations to companies, the international sea law regime also imposes obligations on the sponsoring state. This obligation is related to the steps that the participating states must take to ensure that no violations or damage occur during the project. This article will discuss the legal relationship between the contractor and the sponsoring state, specifically the extent to which the sponsoring state is responsible for the activities of the sponsoring contractor in the ISBA region. To answer this question, the following will be examined: the provisions of the international maritime legal framework, UNCLOS 1982 and related international regulations and examine jurisprudence in related cases, especially in the Advisory Opinion provided by ITLOS in the cases of Responsibilities and Obligations of States sponsoring persons and entities with respect to activities in ISBA (2010). It was found that the international legal framework regulates the state’s responsibility to ensure that no violations or damage occur during these activities. The Advisory Opinion then provided specific restrictions on the extent to which the “responsibility to ensure” must be carried out by the state and whether the state may be liable to pay losses due to damage caused by the activities.","PeriodicalId":36998,"journal":{"name":"Indonesian Journal of International and Comparative Law","volume":"61-62 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indonesian Journal of International and Comparative Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17304/IJIL.VOL18.2.808","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The exploitation of seabed has been regulated in the international sea law regime, namely in UNCLOS 1982 and in its modification regulations, the 1994 Implementing Agreement. This regime regulates the sponsorship mechanism whereby companies wishing to carry out activities in the international seabed must cooperate with states participating in UNCLOS 1982. In addition to providing obligations to companies, the international sea law regime also imposes obligations on the sponsoring state. This obligation is related to the steps that the participating states must take to ensure that no violations or damage occur during the project. This article will discuss the legal relationship between the contractor and the sponsoring state, specifically the extent to which the sponsoring state is responsible for the activities of the sponsoring contractor in the ISBA region. To answer this question, the following will be examined: the provisions of the international maritime legal framework, UNCLOS 1982 and related international regulations and examine jurisprudence in related cases, especially in the Advisory Opinion provided by ITLOS in the cases of Responsibilities and Obligations of States sponsoring persons and entities with respect to activities in ISBA (2010). It was found that the international legal framework regulates the state’s responsibility to ensure that no violations or damage occur during these activities. The Advisory Opinion then provided specific restrictions on the extent to which the “responsibility to ensure” must be carried out by the state and whether the state may be liable to pay losses due to damage caused by the activities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
赞助在国际海底区域开展活动的个人和实体的国家的责任
国际海洋法制度,即1982年《联合国海洋法公约》及其修订条例,即1994年《执行协定》,对海底的开发作出了规定。这一制度规范了赞助机制,希望在国际海底开展活动的公司必须与1982年《联合国海洋法公约》的参加国合作。除了对公司规定义务外,国际海洋法制度还对赞助国规定了义务。这一义务与参与国必须采取的步骤有关,以确保在项目期间不发生违规或损害。本文将讨论承包商与赞助国之间的法律关系,特别是赞助国对赞助承包商在ISBA地区的活动负责的程度。为了回答这个问题,本文将审查以下内容:国际海事法律框架的规定、1982年《联合国海洋法公约》和相关国际法规,并审查相关案例中的判例,特别是国际海洋法法庭就赞助个人和实体在ISBA活动方面的国家责任和义务(2010年)提供的咨询意见。委员会认为,国际法律框架规定了国家确保在这些活动中不发生侵犯或损害的责任。咨询意见随后对国家必须履行“保证责任”的程度以及国家是否有责任赔偿这些活动造成的损害所造成的损失作出了具体限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Beyond the Northwest Forest Plan The Indonesian Government Participation in International Investment Law and Its Reform DIGITAL SERVICES TAX REGULATION AND WTO NON-DISCRIMINATION PRINCIPLE: IS THE DECK STACKED? The Role of the NYPE Inter-Club Agreement as a Modular Apportionment Mechanism for Cargo-Claims across Multiple Jurisdictions The Protection of Foreign Investments in Disputed Maritime Areas of The South China Sea
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1