6 Evaluating diagnostic tests

Jonathan J. Deeks, Jonathan M. Morris
{"title":"6 Evaluating diagnostic tests","authors":"Jonathan J. Deeks,&nbsp;Jonathan M. Morris","doi":"10.1016/S0950-3552(96)80008-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Diagnosis-based decision-making is fundamental to clinical practice. In this chapter, we have seen how clinical symptoms can select a group of patients in whom diagnostic tests can then help the clinician to reach or exclude a diagnosis. Informed use of a diagnostic test requires identification of valid evaluations of its diagnostic abilities. Conventional measures of a test's effectiveness, such as sensitivity and specificity, are of limited use when applying diagnostic tests in clinical practice. Likelihood ratios provide an explicit tool for updating diagnostic probabilities according to test results, and can incorporate variations between individuals in their risk of disease. Their use may help both individual patient management and the appropriate allocation of diagnostic and therapeutic resources.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":77031,"journal":{"name":"Bailliere's clinical obstetrics and gynaecology","volume":"10 4","pages":"Pages 613-630"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0950-3552(96)80008-3","citationCount":"35","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bailliere's clinical obstetrics and gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950355296800083","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 35

Abstract

Diagnosis-based decision-making is fundamental to clinical practice. In this chapter, we have seen how clinical symptoms can select a group of patients in whom diagnostic tests can then help the clinician to reach or exclude a diagnosis. Informed use of a diagnostic test requires identification of valid evaluations of its diagnostic abilities. Conventional measures of a test's effectiveness, such as sensitivity and specificity, are of limited use when applying diagnostic tests in clinical practice. Likelihood ratios provide an explicit tool for updating diagnostic probabilities according to test results, and can incorporate variations between individuals in their risk of disease. Their use may help both individual patient management and the appropriate allocation of diagnostic and therapeutic resources.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
6评估诊断测试
基于诊断的决策是临床实践的基础。在本章中,我们已经看到临床症状如何选择一组患者,然后诊断测试可以帮助临床医生达到或排除诊断。在知情的情况下使用诊断测试需要对其诊断能力进行有效的评估。在临床实践中应用诊断测试时,检测有效性的传统测量方法,如敏感性和特异性,用途有限。似然比为根据测试结果更新诊断概率提供了明确的工具,并可纳入个体之间疾病风险的差异。它们的使用可能有助于个体患者管理和诊断和治疗资源的适当分配。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Prolapse. Vaginal hysterectomy. Contributors to this issue Preface 3 Adverse effects of luteinizing hormone on fertility: fact or fantasy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1