Learning together: the effects of inclusion of students with disabilities in mainstream schools

A. K. Dalcin
{"title":"Learning together: the effects of inclusion of students with disabilities in mainstream schools","authors":"A. K. Dalcin","doi":"10.1108/econ-05-2022-0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis article aims to analyze the impact that the inclusion of students with disabilities has on the achievement of their schoolmates and to analyze the impact that this inclusion has on the achievement of the students with disabilities themselves.Design/methodology/approachThe author begins investigating how the inclusion of students with disabilities in regular schools affects achievement of schoolmates. To answer this research question, the author explores the natural variation in time in the number of students with disabilities and use data from National Exam of Upper Secondary Education (Enem). Then, the author investigates how the inclusion affects achievement of the students with disabilities themselves and uses propensity score matching methodologies and, again, data from Enem.FindingsThe results show that an additional percentage point in the proportion of students with disabilities would reduce schoolmates' writing scores by a 0.0031 standard deviation. In other subjects, the author finds weak or none evidence of a significant peer effect. In addition, using Propensity Score Matching methodologies, the results show that the mean scores are up to 44% of a standard deviation, which is higher among students with disabilities enrolled in regular schools compared to those who are enrolled in special schools. In summary, the evaluation is that inclusion policies achieve the goal of improving the performance of students with disabilities but such policies have a small and adverse side effect.Originality/valueFor this reason, the present study proposes to fill this gap in the literature by analyzing the impact of the inclusion of students with disabilities on both groups. In addition, this paper contributes to the empirical literature of peer effect with an analysis of the peer effect of students with disabilities per competency. Finally, the article is important given the existence of few articles in Brazil on the topic of education and people with disabilities.","PeriodicalId":84551,"journal":{"name":"De economia","volume":"148 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"De economia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/econ-05-2022-0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThis article aims to analyze the impact that the inclusion of students with disabilities has on the achievement of their schoolmates and to analyze the impact that this inclusion has on the achievement of the students with disabilities themselves.Design/methodology/approachThe author begins investigating how the inclusion of students with disabilities in regular schools affects achievement of schoolmates. To answer this research question, the author explores the natural variation in time in the number of students with disabilities and use data from National Exam of Upper Secondary Education (Enem). Then, the author investigates how the inclusion affects achievement of the students with disabilities themselves and uses propensity score matching methodologies and, again, data from Enem.FindingsThe results show that an additional percentage point in the proportion of students with disabilities would reduce schoolmates' writing scores by a 0.0031 standard deviation. In other subjects, the author finds weak or none evidence of a significant peer effect. In addition, using Propensity Score Matching methodologies, the results show that the mean scores are up to 44% of a standard deviation, which is higher among students with disabilities enrolled in regular schools compared to those who are enrolled in special schools. In summary, the evaluation is that inclusion policies achieve the goal of improving the performance of students with disabilities but such policies have a small and adverse side effect.Originality/valueFor this reason, the present study proposes to fill this gap in the literature by analyzing the impact of the inclusion of students with disabilities on both groups. In addition, this paper contributes to the empirical literature of peer effect with an analysis of the peer effect of students with disabilities per competency. Finally, the article is important given the existence of few articles in Brazil on the topic of education and people with disabilities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
共同学习:将残疾学生纳入主流学校的效果
目的本文旨在分析残疾学生的共融对其同学成绩的影响,并分析这种共融对残疾学生自身成绩的影响。设计/方法/方法作者开始调查将残疾学生纳入普通学校如何影响同学的成绩。为了回答这一研究问题,作者利用全国高中教育考试(Enem)的数据,探讨了残疾学生人数的自然时间变化。然后,作者研究了融入如何影响残疾学生本身的成绩,并使用倾向得分匹配方法和来自Enem的数据。结果显示,残疾学生的比例每增加一个百分点,同学的写作分数就会减少0.0031的标准差。在其他科目中,作者发现微弱或根本没有证据表明显著的同伴效应。此外,使用倾向分数匹配方法,结果表明,平均分数高达标准偏差的44%,在普通学校就读的残疾学生中,这一比例高于在特殊学校就读的残疾学生。综上所述,评估结果是,包容性政策达到了提高残疾学生成绩的目标,但这种政策的副作用很小,而且是不利的。因此,本研究建议通过分析残疾学生对这两个群体的影响来填补这一文献空白。此外,本文还对残障学生的同伴效应进行了实证研究。最后,这篇文章很重要,因为巴西很少有关于教育与残障人士的文章。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Altitude and Distance Relationships with the Multidimensional Poverty Index: The case of Peru Small Firm Electricity Demand in Las Cruces, New Mexico, USA Preferential Trade Agreements and Productivity: Evidence from Peru Poverty, population growth and agglomeration effects in all Brazil cities What drives small and medium enterprises to establish and terminate banking relationships?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1