Effect of addition of antispasmodic to local and systemic analgesics on pain perception during hysterosalpingography: a randomized controlled trial

E. Kiridi, P. Oriji, A. Ubom, J. Ugwoegbu, Addah Abegnigo Ojanerohan, I. Abasi, Bosrotsi Panebi, Adesina Adedotun Daniel
{"title":"Effect of addition of antispasmodic to local and systemic analgesics on pain perception during hysterosalpingography: a randomized controlled trial","authors":"E. Kiridi, P. Oriji, A. Ubom, J. Ugwoegbu, Addah Abegnigo Ojanerohan, I. Abasi, Bosrotsi Panebi, Adesina Adedotun Daniel","doi":"10.18203/2349-3259.ijct20222687","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Tubal factor is responsible for most of the causes of infertility, especially in our environment, and hysterosalpingography (HSG) is the investigation of choice for assessing tubal patency. Objective of current study was to evaluate the effect of the addition of intramuscular hyoscine-N-butyl bromide (HBB) to local and systemic analgesics on pain perception during hysterosalpingography.Methods: This randomized controlled trial was conducted at the radiology departments and infertility clinics of four health institutions in Bayelsa State, Nigeria, from January 2020 to April 2022. One thousand and forty infertile women undergoing hysterosalpingography were randomized into four groups, and each group administered four different pain relief methods. Pain scores at different steps of the procedure were recorded. Data were analysed using the Statistical Product and Service Solutions for Windows®, version 25. Student’s t-test was used to compare sample means, while the chi-square test was used to compare the proportion of women in the two study groups, who expressed pain during the procedure.Results: The Paracervical block+HBB appeared to the most effective agent for pain relief in the study as women receiving this medication indicated the least pain intensity scores at all levels of the procedure except at the insertion of the speculum. The differences observed in the indicated pain intensity scores were also statistically significant (p<0.05).Conclusions: Our study revealed that adding HBB, an antispasmodic agent, to diclofenac and paracervical block significantly reduces pain perception during HSG compared to using diclofenac and paracervical block alone.","PeriodicalId":13787,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Trials","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Trials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-3259.ijct20222687","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Tubal factor is responsible for most of the causes of infertility, especially in our environment, and hysterosalpingography (HSG) is the investigation of choice for assessing tubal patency. Objective of current study was to evaluate the effect of the addition of intramuscular hyoscine-N-butyl bromide (HBB) to local and systemic analgesics on pain perception during hysterosalpingography.Methods: This randomized controlled trial was conducted at the radiology departments and infertility clinics of four health institutions in Bayelsa State, Nigeria, from January 2020 to April 2022. One thousand and forty infertile women undergoing hysterosalpingography were randomized into four groups, and each group administered four different pain relief methods. Pain scores at different steps of the procedure were recorded. Data were analysed using the Statistical Product and Service Solutions for Windows®, version 25. Student’s t-test was used to compare sample means, while the chi-square test was used to compare the proportion of women in the two study groups, who expressed pain during the procedure.Results: The Paracervical block+HBB appeared to the most effective agent for pain relief in the study as women receiving this medication indicated the least pain intensity scores at all levels of the procedure except at the insertion of the speculum. The differences observed in the indicated pain intensity scores were also statistically significant (p<0.05).Conclusions: Our study revealed that adding HBB, an antispasmodic agent, to diclofenac and paracervical block significantly reduces pain perception during HSG compared to using diclofenac and paracervical block alone.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
局部和全身镇痛药加用抗痉挛药对子宫输卵管造影时疼痛感知的影响:一项随机对照试验
背景:输卵管因素是导致不孕症的主要原因,尤其是在我们的环境中,子宫输卵管造影(HSG)是评估输卵管通畅的首选方法。本研究的目的是评价肌注海莨菪碱-正丁基溴(HBB)在局部和全身镇痛药物中对子宫输卵管造影时疼痛感知的影响。方法:本随机对照试验于2020年1月至2022年4月在尼日利亚巴耶尔萨州四家卫生机构的放射科和不孕不育诊所进行。140名接受子宫输卵管造影的不孕症妇女被随机分为四组,每组给予四种不同的镇痛方法。记录手术不同阶段的疼痛评分。数据分析使用统计产品和服务解决方案的Windows®,版本25。使用学生t检验来比较样本均值,而使用卡方检验来比较两个研究组中表示在手术过程中疼痛的女性比例。结果:在研究中,宫颈旁阻滞+HBB似乎是缓解疼痛最有效的药物,因为接受这种药物的妇女在除插入镜外的所有级别手术中疼痛强度评分最低。两组指征性疼痛强度评分差异也有统计学意义(p<0.05)。结论:我们的研究显示,与单独使用双氯芬酸和宫颈旁阻滞相比,双氯芬酸和宫颈旁阻滞联合使用HBB(一种抗痉挛药物)可显著降低HSG期间的疼痛感觉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The effectiveness of video feedback intervention on mother-infant interactional quality for women with perinatal mental health illnesses: protocol for a pilot randomised control trial Perioperative management of hyperglycemic patients undergoing surgery: an observational cross sectional study in a tertiary care hospital Perception of decentralized clinical trials and home nursing in oncology clinical research: insights from a survey of clinical research professionals across experimental sites A randomized clinical study comparing Trupler skin stapler and Trulon polyamide suture in post-surgical skin closure during orthopaedic and open abdominal surgeries Immediate effects of bandha hasta utthanasana on cerebral hemodynamics in healthy individuals: a protocol for randomized controlled trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1