30. Follow-up of Patients with Single Pulmonary Nodules and Negative 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography Scans

Abou-Zied M, Zubeldia JM, Nabi HA
{"title":"30. Follow-up of Patients with Single Pulmonary Nodules and Negative 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography Scans","authors":"Abou-Zied M,&nbsp;Zubeldia JM,&nbsp;Nabi HA","doi":"10.1016/S1095-0397(00)00096-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><strong>Purpose:</strong> Positron Emission Tomography with <sup>18</sup>F-Fluorodeoxyglucose (<sup>18</sup>FDG-PET) is becoming the noninvasive test of choice to evaluate patients with single pulmonary nodules (SPN). While positive scans yield a high sensitivity for malignancy, the significance of negative scans remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of negative <sup>18</sup>FDG-PET in patients with SPN.</p><p><strong>Methods:</strong> From January 1998 to January 2000, 59 patients with non-calcified parenchymal SPN underwent <sup>18</sup>FDG-PET evaluations. From a total of 14 pathologically proven tumors 12 patients had positive <sup>18</sup>FDG-PET scans (sensitivity 86%, PPV 100%) with a mean SUV of 5.6. A total of 24 patients (41%) with negative <sup>18</sup>FDG-PET scans were followed up with serial chest x-ray (CXR) and/or Computed tomography (CT) for a period of 6 to 24 months (mean 10.4 months). Histology specimens were available in 5 patients. Two patients had a second PET scan.</p><p><strong>Results:</strong> Nineteen of the 24 negative <sup>18</sup>FDG-PET patients (79.2%) had no evidence of intrathoracic neoplasia at subsequent follow up by CT and/or CXR, for an overall NPV of 86.3%. Two patients (8.3%) had transthoracic needle biopsies that were positive for malignancy after the PET scan. The remaining 3 patients developed intrathoracic malignancies during the follow up period (6, 6, and 9 months respectively) by CT and/or CXR. Repeat <sup>18</sup>FDG-PET scans were positive in 2 patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion:</strong> <sup>18</sup>FDG-PET appears to effectively characterize patients at low risk for malignant transformation of SPN discovered by CT. Blinded, randomized controlled trials are needed for further evaluation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":80267,"journal":{"name":"Clinical positron imaging : official journal of the Institute for Clinical P.E.T","volume":"3 4","pages":"Page 184"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1095-0397(00)00096-0","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical positron imaging : official journal of the Institute for Clinical P.E.T","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1095039700000960","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Purpose: Positron Emission Tomography with 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose (18FDG-PET) is becoming the noninvasive test of choice to evaluate patients with single pulmonary nodules (SPN). While positive scans yield a high sensitivity for malignancy, the significance of negative scans remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of negative 18FDG-PET in patients with SPN.

Methods: From January 1998 to January 2000, 59 patients with non-calcified parenchymal SPN underwent 18FDG-PET evaluations. From a total of 14 pathologically proven tumors 12 patients had positive 18FDG-PET scans (sensitivity 86%, PPV 100%) with a mean SUV of 5.6. A total of 24 patients (41%) with negative 18FDG-PET scans were followed up with serial chest x-ray (CXR) and/or Computed tomography (CT) for a period of 6 to 24 months (mean 10.4 months). Histology specimens were available in 5 patients. Two patients had a second PET scan.

Results: Nineteen of the 24 negative 18FDG-PET patients (79.2%) had no evidence of intrathoracic neoplasia at subsequent follow up by CT and/or CXR, for an overall NPV of 86.3%. Two patients (8.3%) had transthoracic needle biopsies that were positive for malignancy after the PET scan. The remaining 3 patients developed intrathoracic malignancies during the follow up period (6, 6, and 9 months respectively) by CT and/or CXR. Repeat 18FDG-PET scans were positive in 2 patients.

Conclusion: 18FDG-PET appears to effectively characterize patients at low risk for malignant transformation of SPN discovered by CT. Blinded, randomized controlled trials are needed for further evaluation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
30.单发肺结节及18f -氟脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描阴性患者的随访
目的:18f -氟脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描(18FDG-PET)正成为评估单肺结节(SPN)患者的非侵入性检查选择。虽然阳性扫描对恶性肿瘤的敏感性很高,但阴性扫描的意义尚不清楚。本研究的目的是评估18FDG-PET阴性对SPN患者的预后价值。方法:1998年1月~ 2000年1月对59例非钙化实质性SPN患者行18FDG-PET检查。在14例病理证实的肿瘤中,12例患者的18FDG-PET扫描呈阳性(敏感性86%,PPV 100%),平均SUV为5.6。共有24例(41%)18FDG-PET扫描阴性的患者进行了连续胸部x线(CXR)和/或计算机断层扫描(CT)随访,随访时间为6至24个月(平均10.4个月)。5例患者有组织学标本。两名患者进行了第二次PET扫描。结果:24例fdg - pet阴性患者中有19例(79.2%)在随后的CT和/或CXR随访中未发现胸内瘤变,总体NPV为86.3%。2例患者(8.3%)经胸穿刺活检在PET扫描后呈恶性肿瘤阳性。其余3例患者在随访期间(分别为6、6和9个月)通过CT和/或CXR出现胸内恶性肿瘤。2例重复18FDG-PET扫描阳性。结论:18FDG-PET能有效鉴别CT发现的SPN恶性转化低风险患者。需要进行盲法、随机对照试验来进一步评价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Combined PET/CT Imaging in Oncology Attenuation-Correction Induced Artifact in F-18 FDG PET Imaging Following Total Knee Replacement Positron Emission Tomography (PET) and the Changing Face of China Clinical Impact of 18F-FDG-PET in the Suspicion of Recurrent Ovarian Carcinoma Based on Elevated Tumor Marker Serum Levels Superphysiologic FDG Uptake in the Non-Paralyzed Vocal Cord. Resolution of a False-Positive PET Result with Combined PET-CT Imaging.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1