Does change in cervical dilation after anesthesia impact latency after cerclage placement?

IF 0.1 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Journal of Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology Pub Date : 2023-04-24 DOI:10.29328/journal.cjog.1001125
Lende Michelle N, Feustel Paul J, Nicasio Erica K, Lynch Tara A
{"title":"Does change in cervical dilation after anesthesia impact latency after cerclage placement?","authors":"Lende Michelle N, Feustel Paul J, Nicasio Erica K, Lynch Tara A","doi":"10.29328/journal.cjog.1001125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Pregnant individuals with early cervical dilation have a high risk for preterm birth. The authors encountered cases where cervical dilation increased after anesthesia administration for a cerclage. Objective: The primary objective was to assess if a change in cervical dilation after anesthesia administration for a cerclage was associated with a shorter latency to delivery. Study design: This was a retrospective chart review of pregnancies from January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2021, who had a cerclage and delivered at our institution. Maternal demographics, obstetrical history, operative details, and delivery information were collected. Multi-fetal gestations, un-indicated cerclages, and abdominal cerclages were excluded. The primary outcome was the difference in cervical dilation between the office and the operating room after spinal anesthesia administration. A multivariable regression was performed. Results: A total of 183 pregnancies were included. The mean gestational age at cerclage placement was 18 weeks (STDEV 3.6). Twenty-nine percent of patients (53/183) were more dilated in the operating room compared to the office The latency between cerclage and delivery was not different if there was a cervical change between these settings (p = 0.655). There was an increased risk for preterm delivery with dilation in the office (OR 1.01, CI 1.01 to 2.5), but not with dilation in the operating room (OR 1.4, CI 0.9 to 2.0). Conclusion: Cervical dilation between the office and the operating room is different. Pregnancies with more dilation delivered at earlier gestations. However, a change in dilation between the office and the operating room was not associated with a shorter latency.","PeriodicalId":36268,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology","volume":"119 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29328/journal.cjog.1001125","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pregnant individuals with early cervical dilation have a high risk for preterm birth. The authors encountered cases where cervical dilation increased after anesthesia administration for a cerclage. Objective: The primary objective was to assess if a change in cervical dilation after anesthesia administration for a cerclage was associated with a shorter latency to delivery. Study design: This was a retrospective chart review of pregnancies from January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2021, who had a cerclage and delivered at our institution. Maternal demographics, obstetrical history, operative details, and delivery information were collected. Multi-fetal gestations, un-indicated cerclages, and abdominal cerclages were excluded. The primary outcome was the difference in cervical dilation between the office and the operating room after spinal anesthesia administration. A multivariable regression was performed. Results: A total of 183 pregnancies were included. The mean gestational age at cerclage placement was 18 weeks (STDEV 3.6). Twenty-nine percent of patients (53/183) were more dilated in the operating room compared to the office The latency between cerclage and delivery was not different if there was a cervical change between these settings (p = 0.655). There was an increased risk for preterm delivery with dilation in the office (OR 1.01, CI 1.01 to 2.5), but not with dilation in the operating room (OR 1.4, CI 0.9 to 2.0). Conclusion: Cervical dilation between the office and the operating room is different. Pregnancies with more dilation delivered at earlier gestations. However, a change in dilation between the office and the operating room was not associated with a shorter latency.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
麻醉后宫颈扩张的改变会影响环扎术后的潜伏期吗?
背景:早期宫颈扩张的孕妇有早产的高风险。作者遇到的情况下,宫颈扩张增加麻醉后,环扎术。目的:主要目的是评估环扎术麻醉后宫颈扩张的改变是否与较短的分娩潜伏期有关。研究设计:本研究是对2011年1月1日至2021年12月31日期间在我院行环扎术并分娩的孕妇进行回顾性图表回顾。收集产妇人口统计、产科病史、手术细节和分娩信息。排除多胎妊娠、无指征环扎术和腹部环扎术。主要观察结果是脊髓麻醉后办公室和手术室宫颈扩张的差异。进行多变量回归分析。结果:共纳入183例妊娠。结扎放置时的平均胎龄为18周(STDEV 3.6)。29%的患者(53/183)在手术室比在办公室更容易扩张。如果宫颈发生改变,结扎和分娩之间的潜伏期没有差异(p = 0.655)。在办公室进行子宫扩张会增加早产的风险(OR 1.01, CI 1.01 ~ 2.5),但在手术室进行子宫扩张不会增加早产的风险(OR 1.4, CI 0.9 ~ 2.0)。结论:宫颈扩张在办公室和手术室有所不同。妊娠期较早,妊娠期扩张较多。然而,办公室和手术室之间的扩张变化与较短的潜伏期无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology
Journal of Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology Medicine-Obstetrics and Gynecology
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
期刊最新文献
Management of Congenital Cervical Teratoma with Application of EXIT Protocol - Case Report Reverse Breech Extraction versus Vaginal Push before Uterine Incision during Cesarean Section with Fully Dilated Cervix and Impacted Fetal Head Postdate Pregnancy Maternal and Fetal Outcomes among Sudanese Women Age as a Predictor of Time to Response for Patients Undergoing Medical Management of Endometrial Cancer Ectopic Pregnancy Risk Factors Presentation and Management Outcomes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1