The Gatekeeper's Dilemma: "When Should I Transfer This Customer?"

Oper. Res. Pub Date : 2022-01-07 DOI:10.1287/opre.2021.2211
Brett A. Hathaway, E. Kagan, M. Dada
{"title":"The Gatekeeper's Dilemma: \"When Should I Transfer This Customer?\"","authors":"Brett A. Hathaway, E. Kagan, M. Dada","doi":"10.1287/opre.2021.2211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When Should I Transfer This Customer? “Please hold while I transfer you to next level of support.” Most of us have been on the receiving end of this message. In this study, the authors look at transfers from the service worker’s perspective. They create an online experiment in which participants play the role of call center agents who need to decide whether to transfer a virtual service request or continue attempting to resolve it. Consistent with compensation schemes common in call centers, participants receive a bonus for each successful resolution and may pay a penalty if they transfer. The authors find that these incentives generally work well; however, agents appear to overreact to transfer penalties by handling more requests than they should and transferring too few requests. Although this may be good news for customers who dislike being transferred, such behaviors may be costly for the call center; thus, managers need to be careful when rolling out complex compensation schemes.","PeriodicalId":19546,"journal":{"name":"Oper. Res.","volume":"8 1","pages":"843-859"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oper. Res.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2021.2211","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

When Should I Transfer This Customer? “Please hold while I transfer you to next level of support.” Most of us have been on the receiving end of this message. In this study, the authors look at transfers from the service worker’s perspective. They create an online experiment in which participants play the role of call center agents who need to decide whether to transfer a virtual service request or continue attempting to resolve it. Consistent with compensation schemes common in call centers, participants receive a bonus for each successful resolution and may pay a penalty if they transfer. The authors find that these incentives generally work well; however, agents appear to overreact to transfer penalties by handling more requests than they should and transferring too few requests. Although this may be good news for customers who dislike being transferred, such behaviors may be costly for the call center; thus, managers need to be careful when rolling out complex compensation schemes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
守门人的困境:“我应该什么时候转移这位客户?”
我应该在什么时候转移这个客户?“请稍等,我给您转到下一级支援。”我们大多数人都收到过这样的信息。在这项研究中,作者从服务工作者的角度来看待转移。他们创建了一个在线实验,参与者扮演呼叫中心代理的角色,需要决定是转移虚拟服务请求还是继续尝试解决它。与呼叫中心常见的补偿方案一致,参与者每成功解决一个问题都会获得奖金,如果他们转移,可能会受到惩罚。作者发现,这些激励措施通常效果良好;然而,代理似乎对传输惩罚反应过度,处理的请求多于它们应该处理的请求,而传输的请求太少。虽然这对不喜欢被调走的客户来说可能是个好消息,但这种行为可能会让呼叫中心付出高昂的代价;因此,管理人员在推出复杂的薪酬方案时需要谨慎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A web-based multi-criteria decision support system for benchmarking marketing decisions alternatives Integrated optimization of wagon flow routing and train formation plan Two-machine decentralized flow shop scheduling problem with inter-factory batch delivery system A simplified swarm optimization algorithm to minimize makespan on non-identical parallel machines with unequal job release times under non-renewable resource constraints Meta-frontier: literature review and toolkit
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1