Onward (im)mobilities: conceptual reflections and empirical findings from lifestyle migration research and refugee studies

IF 1.2 4区 地球科学 Q3 GEOGRAPHY Erde Pub Date : 2019-03-27 DOI:10.12854/ERDE-2019-408
S. Kordel, Tobias Weidinger
{"title":"Onward (im)mobilities: conceptual reflections and empirical findings from lifestyle migration research and refugee studies","authors":"S. Kordel, Tobias Weidinger","doi":"10.12854/ERDE-2019-408","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Taking the new mobility paradigm as a starting point, this article provides a broader perspective on migration processes that goes beyond decision-making processes, the journey and the arrival, and addresses onward mobilities instead. In this regard, we assume that people permanently negotiate the decision where and how to live by means of various mobility practices and the establishment of place-based belonging. In order to capture different migrant groups, we provide empirical material from two different mixed methods case studies: (1) a study on relatively affluent lifestyle migrants in coastal areas and the rural hinterland in Spain and (2) refugees, who were initially placed in rural Bavaria, Germany. We firstly aim to unravel mobility processes among lifestyle migrants and refugees after arrival in Spain or Germany. Secondly, we aim to identify how migrants’ mobility strategies counteract sedentarist logics of the state. Empirical data show that migrants’ onward mobilities vary at length and thus blur boundaries between residential and everyday mobility. While negotiating mobility and immobility, they develop agency and learn to decide whether, when and how to be mobile or to be fixed to places and establish strategies how to deal with territorially based logics of the state. Thus, state authorities are highly interested in regulations to identify where people reside. Apart from security issues, particularly welfare states have to find solutions how to be responsible for people in a way that goes beyond territorially based registrations. In conceptual terms, results finally provide empirical evidence for a broader understanding of migration, especially considering onward mobility and forms of desired immobility.","PeriodicalId":50505,"journal":{"name":"Erde","volume":"30 1","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Erde","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12854/ERDE-2019-408","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Taking the new mobility paradigm as a starting point, this article provides a broader perspective on migration processes that goes beyond decision-making processes, the journey and the arrival, and addresses onward mobilities instead. In this regard, we assume that people permanently negotiate the decision where and how to live by means of various mobility practices and the establishment of place-based belonging. In order to capture different migrant groups, we provide empirical material from two different mixed methods case studies: (1) a study on relatively affluent lifestyle migrants in coastal areas and the rural hinterland in Spain and (2) refugees, who were initially placed in rural Bavaria, Germany. We firstly aim to unravel mobility processes among lifestyle migrants and refugees after arrival in Spain or Germany. Secondly, we aim to identify how migrants’ mobility strategies counteract sedentarist logics of the state. Empirical data show that migrants’ onward mobilities vary at length and thus blur boundaries between residential and everyday mobility. While negotiating mobility and immobility, they develop agency and learn to decide whether, when and how to be mobile or to be fixed to places and establish strategies how to deal with territorially based logics of the state. Thus, state authorities are highly interested in regulations to identify where people reside. Apart from security issues, particularly welfare states have to find solutions how to be responsible for people in a way that goes beyond territorially based registrations. In conceptual terms, results finally provide empirical evidence for a broader understanding of migration, especially considering onward mobility and forms of desired immobility.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
向前流动:来自生活方式移民研究和难民研究的概念反思和实证结果
本文以新的迁移范式为出发点,提供了一个更广泛的视角来看待迁移过程,它超越了决策过程、旅程和到达,而是讨论了后续的迁移。在这方面,我们假设人们通过各种流动实践和建立基于地点的归属感,永久性地协商决定在哪里和如何生活。为了捕捉不同的移民群体,我们从两个不同的混合方法案例研究中提供了经验材料:(1)对西班牙沿海地区和农村腹地相对富裕生活方式的移民的研究;(2)最初被安置在德国巴伐利亚农村的难民。我们首先旨在揭示生活方式移民和难民抵达西班牙或德国后的流动过程。其次,我们的目标是确定移民的流动策略如何抵消国家的定居主义逻辑。经验数据表明,移民的向前流动在长度上有所不同,因此模糊了居住和日常流动之间的界限。在讨论移动性和不移动性时,他们发展代理并学会决定是否,何时以及如何移动或固定在某个地方,并制定如何处理基于领土的国家逻辑的策略。因此,国家当局对确定人们居住地的法规非常感兴趣。除了安全问题,特别是福利国家必须找到解决方案,如何以一种超越地域登记的方式对人民负责。在概念上,结果最终为更广泛地理解迁移提供了经验证据,特别是考虑到向前流动和期望的不流动形式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Erde
Erde GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL-GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: DIE ERDE is a publication of the Geographical Society of Berlin DIE ERDE is a scientific journal in Geography, with four issues per year with about 100 pages each. It covers all aspects of geographical research, focusing on both earth system studies and regional contributions. DIE ERDE invites contributions from any subfield of both Physical and Human Geography as well as from neighbouring disciplines.
期刊最新文献
Places of well-being in a French region. Lyon residents and their preferences Brazilian government violates Indigenous rights: What could induce a change? Discursive representations of cities in northeast Germany Gender and mobility in the car-dependent urban society of Muscat/ Oman China’s Belt and Road rail freight transport corridors – the economic geography of underdevelopment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1