Body mass index as a predictor of the severity of coronavirus infection in patients with cardiovascular pathology

T. Slesareva, O. Gruzdeva, O. L. Tarasova, A. Kuzmina, A. Alekseenko, I. V. Bykova, V. Ivanov, O. Barbarash
{"title":"Body mass index as a predictor of the severity of coronavirus infection in patients with cardiovascular pathology","authors":"T. Slesareva, O. Gruzdeva, O. L. Tarasova, A. Kuzmina, A. Alekseenko, I. V. Bykova, V. Ivanov, O. Barbarash","doi":"10.23946/2500-0764-2022-7-4-29-44","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim. To investigate the association between body mass index (BMI) and the severity of COVID-19, respiratory failure, and fatal outcome in patients with cardiovascular disease.Materials and Methods. The study included 283 patients with confirmed COVID-19. COVID-19 severity was determined according to the Russian National Guidelines for the Prevention, Diagnostics, and Treatment of COVID-19. The degree of respiratory failure was defined according to the oxygen saturation. BMI was determined by the Quetelet's index, whereas overweight and obesity were diagnosed in accordance with the World Health Organization classification.Results. Comparison of BMI in patients with mild, moderate, and severe COVID-19 did not show statistically signifi differences, although patients with overweight and obesity had a higher frequency of respiratory failure. Further, grade 3 (severe) respiratory failure had average BMI of 28.7 kg/m2 (men) and 34.2 kg/m2 (women), while those with grade 1 (mild) respiratory failure had average BMI of 26.1 kg/m2 (men) and 31.2 kg/m2 (women). In keeping with these fi  patients with a fatal outcome had higher BMI than those with a favorable outcome (31.1 kg/m2 and 27.2 kg/m2, respectively). After an adjustment for the chronic heart failure, BMI between the patients with a fatal and favourable outcome remained different (28.4 kg/m2 and 26.3 kg/m2, respectively). Logistic regression analysis showed that BMI itself had low prognostic signifi yet is became higher if combined with a COVID-19 severity and degree of respiratory failure.Conclusion. Patients with a high BMI are more likely to have a severe respiratory failure and fatal outcome. Therefore, this parameter can be used as an additional factor for the risk stratification.","PeriodicalId":12493,"journal":{"name":"Fundamental and Clinical Medicine","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fundamental and Clinical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23946/2500-0764-2022-7-4-29-44","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim. To investigate the association between body mass index (BMI) and the severity of COVID-19, respiratory failure, and fatal outcome in patients with cardiovascular disease.Materials and Methods. The study included 283 patients with confirmed COVID-19. COVID-19 severity was determined according to the Russian National Guidelines for the Prevention, Diagnostics, and Treatment of COVID-19. The degree of respiratory failure was defined according to the oxygen saturation. BMI was determined by the Quetelet's index, whereas overweight and obesity were diagnosed in accordance with the World Health Organization classification.Results. Comparison of BMI in patients with mild, moderate, and severe COVID-19 did not show statistically signifi differences, although patients with overweight and obesity had a higher frequency of respiratory failure. Further, grade 3 (severe) respiratory failure had average BMI of 28.7 kg/m2 (men) and 34.2 kg/m2 (women), while those with grade 1 (mild) respiratory failure had average BMI of 26.1 kg/m2 (men) and 31.2 kg/m2 (women). In keeping with these fi  patients with a fatal outcome had higher BMI than those with a favorable outcome (31.1 kg/m2 and 27.2 kg/m2, respectively). After an adjustment for the chronic heart failure, BMI between the patients with a fatal and favourable outcome remained different (28.4 kg/m2 and 26.3 kg/m2, respectively). Logistic regression analysis showed that BMI itself had low prognostic signifi yet is became higher if combined with a COVID-19 severity and degree of respiratory failure.Conclusion. Patients with a high BMI are more likely to have a severe respiratory failure and fatal outcome. Therefore, this parameter can be used as an additional factor for the risk stratification.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
体重指数作为心血管疾病患者冠状病毒感染严重程度的预测因子
的目标。研究身体质量指数(BMI)与心血管疾病患者COVID-19严重程度、呼吸衰竭和致命结局之间的关系。材料与方法。该研究包括283名确诊的COVID-19患者。根据《俄罗斯国家COVID-19预防、诊断和治疗指南》确定COVID-19严重程度。根据血氧饱和度确定呼吸衰竭的程度。体重指数由奎特莱特指数决定,而超重和肥胖则根据世界卫生组织的分类来诊断。轻、中、重度COVID-19患者的BMI比较无统计学差异,但超重和肥胖患者发生呼吸衰竭的频率更高。此外,3级(严重)呼吸衰竭患者的平均BMI为28.7 kg/m2(男性)和34.2 kg/m2(女性),而1级(轻度)呼吸衰竭患者的平均BMI为26.1 kg/m2(男性)和31.2 kg/m2(女性)。与这些结果一致的是,具有致命结果的患者的BMI高于具有良好结果的患者(分别为31.1 kg/m2和27.2 kg/m2)。在对慢性心力衰竭进行调整后,致命结局和有利结局的患者之间的BMI仍然不同(分别为28.4 kg/m2和26.3 kg/m2)。Logistic回归分析显示,BMI本身对预后的预测意义较低,但如果合并COVID-19严重程度和呼吸衰竭程度,则BMI的预测意义更高。BMI指数高的患者更有可能出现严重的呼吸衰竭和致命的后果。因此,该参数可作为风险分层的附加因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Clinicopathological Features of Smoking Patients with Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease According to the Frailty Registry Pattern of Circulating Microrna's in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis General Overview of Endometrial Microbiota Uterine Balloon Tamponade in Management of Postpartum Hemorrhage Assessment of Birth Weight Parameters in Sverdlovsk Region: Preliminary Results
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1