Board of Directors Network Centrality and Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Performance

M. Harjoto, Yan Wang
{"title":"Board of Directors Network Centrality and Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Performance","authors":"M. Harjoto, Yan Wang","doi":"10.1108/cg-10-2019-0306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Drawing from social capital, social network theory of stakeholder influence and stakeholder management, the purpose of this paper is to examine the relationship between board network centrality and firms’ environmental, social and governance (ESG) performance.,Using social network analysis, the authors construct five board network centrality, namely, degree centrality (the number of connections), closeness centrality (distance among firms), eigenvector centrality (the quality of connections), betweenness centrality (how often a firm sits between two other firms) and the information centrality (the speed and reliability of information), as measures of board access for social capital and timely information.,Using a sample of non-financial firms listed in the UK FTSE 350 index from 2007 to 2018, the authors find that board networks, measured by degree, closeness, eigenvector, betweenness and information centrality, has positive influence on firms’ ESG performance. Furthermore, the findings show that there is a non-linear relationship between board networks and ESG performance, and this relationship is stronger in the sectors where firms that have high product market concentration and high percentage of women board members.,This study unveils that strong board network centrality brings higher social (reputational) capital and information advantages to the firm to effectively, timely and accurately deal with the pressures from stakeholders (stakeholder management), which leads to better ESG performance.","PeriodicalId":22151,"journal":{"name":"SRPN: Corporate Governance (Topic)","volume":"103 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"38","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SRPN: Corporate Governance (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/cg-10-2019-0306","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 38

Abstract

Drawing from social capital, social network theory of stakeholder influence and stakeholder management, the purpose of this paper is to examine the relationship between board network centrality and firms’ environmental, social and governance (ESG) performance.,Using social network analysis, the authors construct five board network centrality, namely, degree centrality (the number of connections), closeness centrality (distance among firms), eigenvector centrality (the quality of connections), betweenness centrality (how often a firm sits between two other firms) and the information centrality (the speed and reliability of information), as measures of board access for social capital and timely information.,Using a sample of non-financial firms listed in the UK FTSE 350 index from 2007 to 2018, the authors find that board networks, measured by degree, closeness, eigenvector, betweenness and information centrality, has positive influence on firms’ ESG performance. Furthermore, the findings show that there is a non-linear relationship between board networks and ESG performance, and this relationship is stronger in the sectors where firms that have high product market concentration and high percentage of women board members.,This study unveils that strong board network centrality brings higher social (reputational) capital and information advantages to the firm to effectively, timely and accurately deal with the pressures from stakeholders (stakeholder management), which leads to better ESG performance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
董事会网络中心性与环境、社会和治理(ESG)绩效
本文从社会资本、利益相关者影响的社会网络理论和利益相关者管理理论出发,考察董事会网络中心性与企业环境、社会和治理绩效之间的关系。利用社会网络分析,作者构建了五个董事会网络中心性,即程度中心性(连接数量)、亲密中心性(企业之间的距离)、特征向量中心性(连接质量)、中间中心性(企业位于其他两家企业之间的频率)和信息中心性(信息的速度和可靠性),作为衡量董事会获取社会资本和及时信息的指标。作者以2007年至2018年英国富时350指数的非金融类上市公司为样本,发现董事会网络(以程度、亲密度、特征向量、中间性和信息中心性衡量)对公司的ESG绩效有积极影响。此外,研究结果表明,董事会网络与ESG绩效之间存在非线性关系,并且在产品市场集中度高、女性董事会成员比例高的公司中,这种关系更为强烈。本研究发现,较强的董事会网络中心性为公司带来较高的社会(声誉)资本和信息优势,有助于公司有效、及时、准确地应对来自利益相关者(利益相关者管理)的压力,从而提高公司的ESG绩效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Portfolio Primacy and Climate Change Does Social Trust Mitigate Insiders’ Opportunistic Behavior? Evidence from Insider Trading The Role of Corporate Governance Failure in the Grenfell Tower Fire Sustaining Competitive Advantage Through Good Governance and Fiscal Controls: Risk Determinants in Internal Controls A Study on Performance Evaluation of Equity Share and Mutual Funds
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1